Abstract
Swirling jets are commonly used in the burners of gas turbines to enhance mixing or to stabilize the flames. In this manuscript, a stereo (3C2D) particle image velocimetry (SPIV) was applied to examine the near exit region of an isothermal swirling jet inside an octagonal-shaped combustion chamber with a focus on the effects of confinement and Reynolds number (Re) variation on the swirling flow field. Measurements were performed on an axial plus tangential entry swirl burner with a geometric swirl number (Sg) of 1.8 and two different Re, corresponding to 10,900 and 21,800. The results observed in our experimental work are scaled appropriately with the swirl number based on the flux of the axial momentum. The contours of the mean axial velocity field reveal the occurrence of vortex breakdown (VB) for the confined jets compared to the unconfined jets for both Reynolds numbers. Upon confinement, the flow field is dominated by the existence of VB with a wider central recirculation zone (CRZ) and with enhanced axial velocity fluctuations. The enhancement in the Re further increased the CRZ and enhanced the magnitudes of the mean axial velocity and its fluctuations. The outcome obtained from these results includes a better knowledge of the swirl jet in the swirl burner's near region. In addition, the experimental data can be useful for validating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ATSB:
-
Axial plus tangential entry swirl burner
- At:
-
Total area of tangential air inlets
- CC:
-
Combustion chamber
- CoRZ:
-
Corner Recirculation zone
- CRZ:
-
Central Recirculation zone
- D:
-
Nozzle diameter
- Gz:
-
Axial flux of axial momentum
- Gθ:
-
Axial flux of angular momentum
- IRZ:
-
Inner Recirculation zone
- \(\dot{m}\):
-
Mass flow rate
- \({\dot{m}}_{axial}\):
-
Mass flow rate of axial air inlet
- \({\dot{m}}_{tangential}\):
-
Mass flow rate of tangential air inlet
- PIV:
-
Particle image velocimetry
- PVC:
-
Precessing vortex core
- R:
-
Nozzle radius
- Ro:
-
Radial distance of tangential inlets
- frr,z.y:
-
Coordinates
- RB:
-
Recirculation bubble
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- S:
-
Swirl number
- Scr:
-
Critical swirl number
- Sg:
-
Geometric swirl number
- SJ:
-
Swirling Jet
- SP:
-
Stagnation Point
- SR:
-
Split ratio
- U:
-
Mean Axial velocity
- u':
-
Axial velocity fluctuation
- Ubulk:
-
Bulk velocity
- V:
-
Mean radial velocity
- v':
-
Radial velocity fluctuation
- VB:
-
Vortex breakdown
- W:
-
Mean tangential velocity
- w':
-
Tangential velocity fluctuation
- ρ:
-
Density of air
- µ:
-
Dynamic viscosity of air
References
Khalil AEE, Brooks JM, Gupta AK (2016) Impact of confinement on flowfield of swirl flow burners. Fuel 184:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.098
Cozzi F, Coghe A, Sharma R (2018) Analysis of local entrainment rate in the initial region of isothermal free swirling jets by Stereo PIV. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 94:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.01.013
Barakat S, Wang H, Jin T, Tao W, Wang G (2021) Isothermal swirling flow characteristics and pressure drop analysis of a novel double swirl burner. AIP Adv 11. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041361
Litvinov IV, Suslov DA, Gorelikov EU, Shtork SI (2021) Swirl number and nozzle confinement effects in a flat-vane axial swirler. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 91:108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108812
Cozzi F, Sharma R, Solero G (2019) Analysis of coherent structures in the near-field region of an isothermal free swirling jet after vortex breakdown. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 109:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109860
Vignat G, Durox D, Candel S (2022) The suitability of different swirl number definitions for describing swirl flows: accurate, common and (over-) simplified formulations. Prog Energy Combust Sci 89:100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2021.100969
Santhosh R, Miglani A, Basua S (2014) Transition in vortex breakdown modes in a coaxial isothermal unconfined swirling jet. Phys Fluids 26. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870016
Oberleithner K, Paschereit CO, Seele R, Wygnanski I (2012) Formation of turbulent vortex breakdown: intermittency, criticality, and global instability. AIAA J 50:1437–1452. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050642
Alekseenko SV, Abdurakipov SS, Hrebtov MY, Tokarev MP, Dulin VM, Markovich DM (2018) Coherent structures in the near-field of swirling turbulent jets: A tomographic PIV study. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 70:363–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.12.009
Syred N, Dahman DR (1978) Effect of high levels of confinement upon the aerodynamics of swirl burners. J Energy 2:8–15. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.47950
Vashahi F, Lee S, Lee J (2016) Experimental analysis of the swirling flow in a model rectangular gas turbine combustor. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 76:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.03.032
Syred N (2006) A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (PVC) in swirl combustion systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 32:93–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.10.002
Farokhi S, Taghavi RRE (1989) Effect of initial swirl distribution on the evolution of a turbulent jet. AIAA J 27:700–706
Stöhr M, Sadanandan R, Meier W (2011) Phase-resolved characterization of vortex-flame interaction in a turbulent swirl flame. Exp Fluids 51:1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1134-y
Yongqiang Fu, Jun Cai S-MJ and HM (2007) Characteristics of the swirling flow generated by a counter-rotating swirler. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Jt. Propuls. Conf. Exhib., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-5690
Cozzi F, Sharma R, Coghe A, Arzuffi F (2015) An Experimental Investigation on Isothermal Free Swirling Jet. XXXVIII Meet Ital Sect Combust Inst 3–8
Sharma R, Cozzi F (2017) Experimental study of unconfined and confined isothermal swirling jets. Int J Mech Mechatronics Eng 11:386–396. https://doi.org/10.1999/1307-6892/10006459
Panda J, McLaughlin DK (1994) Experiments on the instabilities of a swirling jet. Phys Fluids 6:263–276. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868074
Feikema D, Chen RH, Driscoll JF (1990) Enhancement of flame blowout limits by the use of swirl. Combust Flame 80:183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(90)90126-C
Claypole T, Syred N (1981) The effect of swirl burner aerodynamics on NOx formation. In: Eighteenth Symp Combust Combust Inst 81–9
Sharma R, Cozzi F, Coghe A (2016) Phase-averaged characterization of turbulent isothermal free swirling jet after vortex breakdown 4–7
Lucca-Negro O, O’Doherty T (2001) Vortex breakdown: a review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27:431–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00022-8
Douglas CM, Lesshafft L (2022) Confinement effects in laminar swirling jets. J Fluid Mech 945:27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.589
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. Aldo Coghe for the fruitful discussion and invaluable assistance in carrying out the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sharma, R., Cozzi, F. (2024). Effects of Confinement and Reynolds Number Variation on the Flow Field of Swirling Jets. In: Das, S., Mangadoddy, N., Hoffmann, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fluid, Thermal and Energy Systems . ICFTES 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5989-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5990-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)