Abstract
Separate correlations were proposed to predict a two-phase frictional pressure drop for the three identified flow regimes, namely bubble flow, pulse flow, and spray flow for the concurrent gas–liquid upflow through the packed bed from the large experimental data. In this work, the gas–liquid systems studied are air–water, air-56% glycerol, and air-monoethanolamin; the column packing investigated are Raschig rings, Intalox saddles, and ceramic spheres of two sizes. Liquid flow rates were varied from 3.53 to 43.92 kg/(m2s) and air flow rates from 0.265 to 1.768 kg/(m2s). It is noted that pressure drop increases with an increase in gas and liquid flow rates, which is consistent with literature findings. It is observed that pressure drop is higher for the system with high liquid viscosity, and it is also observed that pressure drop is influenced by the combined effect of packing particle size, shape, and porosity of the beds. These correlations predicted the pressure drop of the current experimental data (1150 data points) and literature data (770 data points) with an RMS deviation of 12.8%.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- dc:
-
Column diameter [m]
- de:
-
Equivalent particle diameter (2/3)(ϕ dp) (ε/1-ε) [m]
- dp:
-
Particle diameter [m]
- f:
-
Two-phase friction factor –
- g:
-
Acceleration due to gravity [m/s2]
- G:
-
Gas flow rate [kg/(m2 s)]
- h:
-
Distance between the pressure tapping [m]
- L:
-
Liquid flow rate [kg/(m2 s)]
- MO:
-
Morton number (gμl4/ρlσl3) –
- n:
-
Number of observations
- ΔP:
-
Two-phase pressure drop [N/m2]
- Re:
-
Reynolds number –
- Rms:
-
Root mean square deviation –
- u:
-
Velocity [m/s]
- ε:
-
Bed porosity –
- \(\phi \):
-
Sphericity –
- μ:
-
Viscosity [kg/(m.s)]
- ρ:
-
Density [kg/m3]
- ρB:
-
Bulk density [kg/m3]
- σ:
-
Surface tension [N/m]
- A-W:
-
Air-water
- A-G:
-
Air-56% Glycerol
- BF:
-
Bubble flow
- CS:
-
Ceramics spheres
- Exp:
-
Experimental
- FR:
-
Flow regime
- G-L:
-
Gas-liquid
- Id:
-
Internal diameter
- IS:
-
Intalox saddles
- MEA:
-
Monoethanolamine
- PF:
-
Pulse flow
- Pre:
-
Predicted
- RR:
-
Raschig Rings
- SF:
-
Spray flow
- Sph:
-
Ceramics spheres
- B:
-
Bulk
- f:
-
Frictional
- g:
-
Gas
- l:
-
Liquid
- t:
-
Total
References
Khan A (1998) Flow pattern of the phases, phase holdup and pressure drop on concurrent gas-liquid upflow through packed beds. PhD thesis, Department of chemical Engineering, IIT Madras, India
Turpin JL, Huntington RL (1967) Prediction of pressure drop for two-phase, two component concurrent flow in packed beds. AIChE J 13(6):1196–1202
Specchia V, Sicardi S, Gianetto A (1974) Absorption in packed towers with concurrent upward flow. AIChE J 20(4):646–653
Sato Y, Hirose T, Ida T (1974) Kagaku Kogaku upward cocurrent gas liquid flow in packed beds, vol 38, pp 534–543
Smith D, Reznik A, Pontello A (1979) Pitsburgh energy research centre quarterly reports. In: Shah YT (ed) Personnel communication cited in gas-liquid-soild reactor design, p 231. McGraw-Hill Book, New York
Mazzarino I, Sicardi S, Baldi G (1987) Effectiveness in an upflow multiphase reactor. Chem Eng J 36:151–160
Goto G, Gaspillo PD (1992) Multiple hydrodynamic states in gas-liquid upflow and downflow through beds of small packings. Ind Eng Chem Res 31:629–632
Murugesan T, Sivakumar V (2002) Pressure drop and flow regimes in cocurrent gas-liquid upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng J 88:233–243
Saada MY (1975) Fluid mechanics of co-current two phase flow in packed-beds: pressure drop and liquid hold-up studies. Period Polytech Chem Eng 19:317–337
Ford LH (1960) Multiphase flow through porous media, with special reference to the turbulent regime. PhD thesis, University of London, UK
Sicardi S, Baldi G, Specchia V, Mazzarino I (1984) Hydrodynamics of fluid bed reactors with cocurrent upward flows. Quad Ing Chim Ital 20:66–69
Wu Y, Khadilkar MR, Al-Dahhan MH, Dudukovi MP (1996) Comparison of upflow and downflow two-phase flow packed-bed reactors with the without fines: experimental observations. Ind Eng Chem Res 35:397–405
Molga EJ, Westerterp KR (1997) Experimental study of a cocurrent upflow packed bed bubble column reactor: pressure drop, holdup and interfacial area. Chem Eng Process 36:489–495
Yang XL, Wild G, Euzen JP (1992) A comparison of hydrodynamics of packed-bed reactors with cocurrent upflow and downflow of gas and liquid. Chem Eng Sci 47:1323–1325
Srinivas KV, Chabra RP (1994) Pressure drop in two phase cocurrent upward flow in packed beds: air/non-Newtonian liquid systems. Can J Chem Eng 72:1085–1091
Larachi F, Wild G, Laurent A, Midoux N (1994) Influence of gas density on the hydrodynamics of cocurrent gas-liquid upflow fixed bed reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 33:519–525
Iliuta I, Thyrion FC, Muntean O (1996) Hydrodynamic characteristics of two-phase flow through fixed beds: air/Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids. Chem Eng Sci 51:4987–4995
Sindhu H, Sai PST (2003) A model for pressure drop and liquid saturation in gas-liquid co current upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng J 93:135–142
Park JH, Park HS, Lee M, Moriyama K (2018) Modelling of pressure drop in two-phase flow of mono-sized spherical. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 127:986–995
Schmidt W (2003) Influence of multidimensionality and interfacial friction on the coolability of fragmented corium. University of Stuttgart, p 13
Bouteldja H, Hamidipour M, Larachi F (2013) Hydrodynamics of an inclined gas-liquid concurrent upflow packed bed. Chem Eng Sci 102:397–404
Li L, Zhang S, Wang K, Wang H (2020) Pressure drops and dryout heat fluxes of packed beds with cylindrical particles. Heat Transf Eng 41:1014–1025
Reed AW (1982) PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Schulenberg T, Muller U (1987) An improved model for two phase flow through beds of coarse particles. Int J Multiph Flow 13:87–97
Xu L, Yu B, Wang C, Jiang H, Liu Y, Chen R (2022) Particle-resolved CFD simulations of local bubble behaviors in a mini-packed bed with gas–liquid concurrent flow. Chem Eng Sci 41:85–108
Motil BJ, Ramé E, Salgi P, Taghavi M, Balakotaiah V (2021) Gas-liquid flows through porous media in microgravity: the international space station packed bed reactor experiment. AIChE J 67
Yu K, Wang W, Zhang T, Yong Y, Yang C (2019) Effects of internals on phase holdup and backmixing in a slightlyexpanded-bed reactor with gas–liquid concurrent upflow. Chin J Chem Eng 27:227–2283
Raghavendra Rao AV, Kishore Kumar R, Sankarshana T, Khan A (2011) Identification of flow regimes in concurrent gas liquid upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng Technol 34:1909–1917
Kumar RK, Rao AR, Sankarshana T, Khan A (2012) Liquid holdup in concurrent gas liquid upflow through packed column with random and corrugated structured packing. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, vol II
Ettiyappan P, Babu J, Arunagiri A, Murugesan T (2006) Prediction of two-phase pressure drop and liquid holdup in co-current gas-liquid downflow of air-newtonian systems through packed beds. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:70–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rao, A.V.R., Bethi, B., Radhika, G.B., Kumar, R.K. (2024). Pressure Drop in Concurrent Gas–Liquid Upflow Through Packed Beds. In: Das, S., Mangadoddy, N., Hoffmann, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fluid, Thermal and Energy Systems . ICFTES 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5989-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5990-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)