Skip to main content

Pressure Drop in Concurrent Gas–Liquid Upflow Through Packed Beds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fluid, Thermal and Energy Systems (ICFTES 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

Separate correlations were proposed to predict a two-phase frictional pressure drop for the three identified flow regimes, namely bubble flow, pulse flow, and spray flow for the concurrent gas–liquid upflow through the packed bed from the large experimental data. In this work, the gas–liquid systems studied are air–water, air-56% glycerol, and air-monoethanolamin; the column packing investigated are Raschig rings, Intalox saddles, and ceramic spheres of two sizes. Liquid flow rates were varied from 3.53 to 43.92 kg/(m2s) and air flow rates from 0.265 to 1.768 kg/(m2s). It is noted that pressure drop increases with an increase in gas and liquid flow rates, which is consistent with literature findings. It is observed that pressure drop is higher for the system with high liquid viscosity, and it is also observed that pressure drop is influenced by the combined effect of packing particle size, shape, and porosity of the beds. These correlations predicted the pressure drop of the current experimental data (1150 data points) and literature data (770 data points) with an RMS deviation of 12.8%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

dc:

Column diameter [m]

de:

Equivalent particle diameter (2/3)(ϕ dp) (ε/1-ε) [m]

dp:

Particle diameter [m]

f:

Two-phase friction factor –

g:

Acceleration due to gravity [m/s2]

G:

Gas flow rate [kg/(m2 s)]

h:

Distance between the pressure tapping [m]

L:

Liquid flow rate [kg/(m2 s)]

MO:

Morton number (gμl4lσl3) –

n:

Number of observations

ΔP:

Two-phase pressure drop [N/m2]

Re:

Reynolds number –

Rms:

Root mean square deviation –

u:

Velocity [m/s]

ε:

Bed porosity –

\(\phi \):

Sphericity –

μ:

Viscosity [kg/(m.s)]

ρ:

Density [kg/m3]

ρB:

Bulk density [kg/m3]

σ:

Surface tension [N/m]

A-W:

Air-water

A-G:

Air-56% Glycerol

BF:

Bubble flow

CS:

Ceramics spheres

Exp:

Experimental

FR:

Flow regime

G-L:

Gas-liquid

Id:

Internal diameter

IS:

Intalox saddles

MEA:

Monoethanolamine

PF:

Pulse flow

Pre:

Predicted

RR:

Raschig Rings

SF:

Spray flow

Sph:

Ceramics spheres

B:

Bulk

f:

Frictional

g:

Gas

l:

Liquid

t:

Total

References

  1. Khan A (1998) Flow pattern of the phases, phase holdup and pressure drop on concurrent gas-liquid upflow through packed beds. PhD thesis, Department of chemical Engineering, IIT Madras, India

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turpin JL, Huntington RL (1967) Prediction of pressure drop for two-phase, two component concurrent flow in packed beds. AIChE J 13(6):1196–1202

    Google Scholar 

  3. Specchia V, Sicardi S, Gianetto A (1974) Absorption in packed towers with concurrent upward flow. AIChE J 20(4):646–653

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sato Y, Hirose T, Ida T (1974) Kagaku Kogaku upward cocurrent gas liquid flow in packed beds, vol 38, pp 534–543

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith D, Reznik A, Pontello A (1979) Pitsburgh energy research centre quarterly reports. In: Shah YT (ed) Personnel communication cited in gas-liquid-soild reactor design, p 231. McGraw-Hill Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzarino I, Sicardi S, Baldi G (1987) Effectiveness in an upflow multiphase reactor. Chem Eng J 36:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goto G, Gaspillo PD (1992) Multiple hydrodynamic states in gas-liquid upflow and downflow through beds of small packings. Ind Eng Chem Res 31:629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murugesan T, Sivakumar V (2002) Pressure drop and flow regimes in cocurrent gas-liquid upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng J 88:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saada MY (1975) Fluid mechanics of co-current two phase flow in packed-beds: pressure drop and liquid hold-up studies. Period Polytech Chem Eng 19:317–337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ford LH (1960) Multiphase flow through porous media, with special reference to the turbulent regime. PhD thesis, University of London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sicardi S, Baldi G, Specchia V, Mazzarino I (1984) Hydrodynamics of fluid bed reactors with cocurrent upward flows. Quad Ing Chim Ital 20:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Y, Khadilkar MR, Al-Dahhan MH, Dudukovi MP (1996) Comparison of upflow and downflow two-phase flow packed-bed reactors with the without fines: experimental observations. Ind Eng Chem Res 35:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Molga EJ, Westerterp KR (1997) Experimental study of a cocurrent upflow packed bed bubble column reactor: pressure drop, holdup and interfacial area. Chem Eng Process 36:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang XL, Wild G, Euzen JP (1992) A comparison of hydrodynamics of packed-bed reactors with cocurrent upflow and downflow of gas and liquid. Chem Eng Sci 47:1323–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srinivas KV, Chabra RP (1994) Pressure drop in two phase cocurrent upward flow in packed beds: air/non-Newtonian liquid systems. Can J Chem Eng 72:1085–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larachi F, Wild G, Laurent A, Midoux N (1994) Influence of gas density on the hydrodynamics of cocurrent gas-liquid upflow fixed bed reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 33:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iliuta I, Thyrion FC, Muntean O (1996) Hydrodynamic characteristics of two-phase flow through fixed beds: air/Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids. Chem Eng Sci 51:4987–4995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sindhu H, Sai PST (2003) A model for pressure drop and liquid saturation in gas-liquid co current upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng J 93:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JH, Park HS, Lee M, Moriyama K (2018) Modelling of pressure drop in two-phase flow of mono-sized spherical. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 127:986–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt W (2003) Influence of multidimensionality and interfacial friction on the coolability of fragmented corium. University of Stuttgart, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bouteldja H, Hamidipour M, Larachi F (2013) Hydrodynamics of an inclined gas-liquid concurrent upflow packed bed. Chem Eng Sci 102:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li L, Zhang S, Wang K, Wang H (2020) Pressure drops and dryout heat fluxes of packed beds with cylindrical particles. Heat Transf Eng 41:1014–1025

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reed AW (1982) PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schulenberg T, Muller U (1987) An improved model for two phase flow through beds of coarse particles. Int J Multiph Flow 13:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu L, Yu B, Wang C, Jiang H, Liu Y, Chen R (2022) Particle-resolved CFD simulations of local bubble behaviors in a mini-packed bed with gas–liquid concurrent flow. Chem Eng Sci 41:85–108

    Google Scholar 

  26. Motil BJ, Ramé E, Salgi P, Taghavi M, Balakotaiah V (2021) Gas-liquid flows through porous media in microgravity: the international space station packed bed reactor experiment. AIChE J 67

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yu K, Wang W, Zhang T, Yong Y, Yang C (2019) Effects of internals on phase holdup and backmixing in a slightlyexpanded-bed reactor with gas–liquid concurrent upflow. Chin J Chem Eng 27:227–2283

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raghavendra Rao AV, Kishore Kumar R, Sankarshana T, Khan A (2011) Identification of flow regimes in concurrent gas liquid upflow through packed beds. Chem Eng Technol 34:1909–1917

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar RK, Rao AR, Sankarshana T, Khan A (2012) Liquid holdup in concurrent gas liquid upflow through packed column with random and corrugated structured packing. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, vol II

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ettiyappan P, Babu J, Arunagiri A, Murugesan T (2006) Prediction of two-phase pressure drop and liquid holdup in co-current gas-liquid downflow of air-newtonian systems through packed beds. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:70–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Raghavendra Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rao, A.V.R., Bethi, B., Radhika, G.B., Kumar, R.K. (2024). Pressure Drop in Concurrent Gas–Liquid Upflow Through Packed Beds. In: Das, S., Mangadoddy, N., Hoffmann, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fluid, Thermal and Energy Systems . ICFTES 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5990-7_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5989-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5990-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics