Skip to main content

Considerations in the Development of STEL-Aligned Professional Development Guidelines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Standards-Based Technology and Engineering Education

Abstract

The release of the Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy (STEL) in 2020 provided an updated perspective for the organization and teaching of technology, engineering, and design (TED) education content and practices. While STEL is designed to help guide TED curriculum, assessments, teaching practices, and teacher preparation efforts, concurrently there have been calls for high-quality professional development (PD) to assist school systems and educators in providing authentic TED learning experiences. This coupled with the growing number of out-of-content area and alternatively licensed educators being tasked with teaching TED courses suggests that there is a need for PD efforts to adequately prepare educators and school systems for providing rigorous and relevant, design-based STEL-aligned instruction. This chapter provides a synthesis of TED education PD studies from the literature and focuses on characteristics of effective PD, alignment of PD with TED and cross-cutting academic standards, PD standards for TED education, format and delivery considerations for effective PD, examples of previous TED education PD experiences that addressed various categories of educators’ knowledge (Shulman in Harvard Educ Rev 57:1–22, 1987), and addressing important TED specific issues through PD (i.e., specialized safety training required to oversee design-based TED laboratory experiences that provide unique learning opportunities). From this synthesis of the literature, recommendations for further research and future STEL-aligned PD efforts are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2014). K12 Teacher professional development. https://www.asee.org/education-jobs/PREK-12/eGFI/k12-Teacher-Professional-Development

  • Asempapa, R. S., & Love, T. S. (2021). Teaching math modeling through 3D-printing: Examining the influence of an integrative professional development. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, Z. K., & Reeve, E. M. (2013). Developing effective STEM professional development programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4

  • Bowen, B. (2013). Measuring teacher effectiveness when comparing alternatively and traditionally licensed high school technology education teachers in North Carolina. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, B., Williams, T., Napoleon, L., & Marx, A. (2019). Teacher preparedness: A comparison of alternatively and traditionally certified technology and engineering education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 30(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v30i2.a.5

  • Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional development through STEM integration: How early career math and science teachers respond to experiencing integrated STEM tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common core state standards. Author. https://learning.ccsso.org/common-core-state-standards-initiative

  • Chiu, T. K. F., Chai, C. S., Williams, P. J., & Lin, T.-J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory-based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, R. L., Daugherty, J., Zeng, Y., Westrick, M., & Merrill, C. (2007). Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students. http://ncete.org/flash/pdfs/Delivering_Core_Concepts_Merrill.pdf

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, J. L. (2010). Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design and Technology Teachers’ Association Australia (DATTA Australia). (2019). Technologies teacher shortage survey: National overview 2019. https://www.datta.wa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/technology-teacher-shortage-survey-report-2019-datta-australia.pdf

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, W., Liu, D., Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., Bolshakova, V. L. J., & Moore, T. J. (2019). The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Islami, R. A. Z., Anantanukulwong, R., & Faikhamta, C. (2022). Trends of teacher professional development strategies: A systematic review. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i2.4628

  • Geesa, R. L., Rose, M. A., & Stith, K. M. (2021). Leadership in integrative STEM education: Collaborative strategies for facilitating an experiential and student-centered culture. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs, M. E., Love, T. S., Long, D. L., & Kittrel, D. (2016). Science educators teaching engineering design: An examination across science professional development sites. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(11), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i11.1832

  • Han, J., Kelley, T. R., Bartholomew, S., & Knowles, J. G. (2020). Sharpening STEL with integrated STEM. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 80(3), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2022). Building a sustainable model of integrated stem education: Investigating secondary school STEM classes after an integrated STEM project. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09777-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of integrative STEM education: Teacher and administrator professional development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Lynch, K., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2020). Professional development that improves STEM outcomes. Phi Delta Kappan, 101(5), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720903829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Education Committee. (2017). Recruitment and retention of teachers. HC 199. London. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/199/199.pdf

  • Hughes, A. J., & Denson, C. D. (2021). Scaffolding middle and high school students’ engineering design experiences: Quality problem-SCOPEing promoting successful solutions. Journal of Technology Education, 32(2), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i2.a.1

  • Hughes, A. J., & Partida, E. (2020). Promoting preservice STEM education teachers’ metacognitive awareness: Professional development designed to improve teacher metacognitive awareness. Journal of Technology Education, 32(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i1.a.1

  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA). (2020a). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education. https://www.iteea.org/stel.aspx

  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA). (2020b). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education. Executive summary. https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx?id=168785&v

  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. ITEA. https://www.iteea.org/42523.aspx

  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA/ITEEA). (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Han, J., & Trice, A. N. (2021). Models of integrated STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 22(1), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., Sung, E., Han, J., & Knowles, J. G. (2022). Impacting secondary students’ STEM knowledge through collaborative STEM teacher partnerships. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09783-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. G., Kelley, T., & Holland, J. D. (2018). Increasing teacher awareness of STEM careers. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, R., & Danechi, S. (2021). Teacher recruitment and retention in England. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper no. 07222. House of Commons Library. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7222/CBP-7222.pdf

  • Love, T. S. (2015). Examining the demographics and preparation experiences of foundations of technology teachers. The Journal of Technology Studies, 41(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v41i1.a.7

  • Love, T. S. (2017a). Perceptions of teaching safer engineering practices: Comparing the influence of professional development delivered by technology and engineering, and science educators. Science Educator, 26(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S. (2017b). Tools and materials in primary education: Examining differences among male and female teachers’ safety self-efficacy. In L. Litowitz & S. Warner (Eds.), Technology and engineering education—Fostering the creativity of youth around the globe. Proceedings of the 34th Pupil's Attitude Toward Technology Conference. Millersville University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S. (2019). Safety perspectives and resources from across the pond. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 78(5), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S. (2018). The T&E in STEM: A collaborative effort. The Science Teacher, 86(3), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_086_03_8

  • Love, T. S. (2022). Examining the influence that professional development has on educators’ perceptions of integrated STEM safety in makerspaces. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09955-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., Attaluri, A., Tunks, R. D., Cysyk, J., & Harter, K. (2022a). Examining changes in high school teachers’ perceptions of utilizing 3D printing to teach biomedical engineering concepts: Results from an integrated STEM professional development experience. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 23(2), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., Bartholomew, S. R., & Yauney, J. (2022b). Examining changes in teachers’ beliefs toward integrating computational thinking to teach literacy and math concepts in grades K-2. Journal for STEM Education Research, 5, 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., Cysyk, J., Attaluri, A., Tunks, R. D., Harter, K., & Sipos, R. (2023a). Examining science and technology/engineering educators’ views of teaching biomedical concepts through physical computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09996-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., Duffy, B. C., Loesing, M. L., Roy, K. R., & West, S. S. (2020). Safety in STEM education standards and frameworks: A comparative content analysis. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 80(3), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., & Hughes, A. J. (2022). Engineering pedagogical content knowledge: Examining correlations with formal and informal preparation experiences. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(29), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00345-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., & Love, Z. J. (2023). The teacher recruitment crisis: Examining influential recruitment factors from a United States technology and engineering teacher preparation program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09727-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., & Maiseroulle, T. (2021). Are technology and engineering educator programs really declining? Reexamining the status and characteristics of programs in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 33(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.1

  • Love, T. S., & Roy, K. R. (2022). Safer engineering and CTE instruction: A national STEM education imperative. What the data tells us. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. https://www.iteea.org/safety

  • Love, T. S., Roy, K. R., Gill, M., & Harrell, M. (2022c). Examining the influence that safety training format has on educators’ perceptions of safer practices in makerspaces and integrated STEM labs. Journal of Safety Research, 82, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., Roy, K. R., & Sirinides, P. (2023b). A national study examining safety factors and training associated with STEM education and CTE laboratory accidents in the United States. Safety Science, 160(106058), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S., & Wells, J. G. (2018). Examining correlations between the preparation experiences of U.S. technology and engineering educators and their teaching of science content and practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9395-2

  • Loveland, T., Love, T. S., Wilkerson, T., & Simmons, P. (2020). Jackson’s Mill to Chinsegut: The journey leading to STEL 2020. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 79(5), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeng, J. L., Whitworth, B. A., Gonczi, A. L., Navy, S. L., & Wheeler, L. B. (2017). Elementary science teachers’ integration of engineering design into science instruction: Results from a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1529–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1340688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, E. J., Kaya, E., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Iglesias, J. (2018). Assessing high school science teachers’ nature of engineering (NOE) perceptions with an open-ended NOE instrument. Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-29821

  • Mesutoglu, C., & Baran, E. (2020). Examining the development of middle school science teachers’ understanding of engineering design process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1509–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10041-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian, A., Pinnell, M., Petry, L., Srinivasan, R., Franco, S., & Taylor, M. (2016). Summer research and collaborative professional development experience for NSF RET teachers in advanced manufacturing and materials. In Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Education and Globalization: Vol. 5, Phoenix, AZ (pp. 11–17). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2016-66141

  • Moye, J. J., Reed, P. A., Wu-Rorrer, R., & Lecorchick, D. (2020). Current and future trends and issues facing technology and engineering education in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 32(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v32i1.a.3

  • Neutens, T., & Wyffels, F. (2018). Bringing computer science education to secondary school: A teacher first approach. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 840–845). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159568

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2021). Resource for development and delivery of training to workers (OSHA 3824-05R 2021). https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/osha3824.pdf

  • Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-en

  • Phillips, K. R., De Miranda, M. A., & Shin, J. T. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge and industrial design education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 35(2), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T., West, M. E., Kajfez, R. L., Malone, K. L., & Irving, K. E. (2019). The effect of teacher professional development on implementing engineering in elementary schools. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1246

  • Portsmore, M. D., Watkins, J., & Swanson, R. D. (2020). “I understand their frustrations a little bit better”: Elementary teachers’ affective stances in engineering in an online learning program. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33969

  • Reed, P. A., & Ferguson, M. K. (2021). Safety training for career and content switchers. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 80(7), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P. A., Dooley, K., Love, T. S., & Bartholomew, S. R. (2022). Overview of standards for technological and engineering literacy. Paper presented at the Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41253

  • Reinsfield, E., & Lee, K. (2021). Exploring the technology teacher shortage in New Zealand: The implications for quality teaching and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1649–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09668-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. A., Shumway, S., Carter, V., & Brown, J. (2015). Identifying characteristics of technology and engineering teachers striving for excellence using a modified Delphi. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. J. (2021). Craftspeople’s new identity: The impact of digital fabrication technologies on craft practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2365–2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09687-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strimel, G. (2013). Engineering by design™: Preparing STEM teachers for the 21st century. In J. Williams & D. Gedera (Eds.), Technology education for the future—A play on sustainability. Proceedings of the 27th Pupil’s Attitude Toward Technology Conference (pp. 447–456). University of Waikato. http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT27/PATT27proceedingsNZDec2013.pdf

  • van As, F. (2018). Communities of practice as a tool for continuing professional development of technology teachers’ professional knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9401-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, K. S. (2019). The demise of traditional technology and engineering education teacher preparation programs and a new direction for the profession. Journal of Technology Education, 31(1), 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandeler, C., & Hart, S. (2020). The Fresno State transportation challenge. Mineta Transportation Institute Publications. https://doi.org/10.31979/mti.2020.1955

  • Williams, J., & Lockley, J. (2012). Using CoRes to develop the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of early career science and technology teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. O., & Ernst, J. V. (2022). Technology and engineering education teacher characteristics: Analysis of a decade of institute of education sciences nationally representative data. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 23(4), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler S. Love .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Love, T.S., Roy, K.R. (2023). Considerations in the Development of STEL-Aligned Professional Development Guidelines. In: Bartholomew, S.R., Hoepfl, M., Williams, P.J. (eds) Standards-Based Technology and Engineering Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5704-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5704-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5703-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5704-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics