Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap Between Information Asymmetry and IR4.0: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Issues in Finance, Investment and Banking in Malaysia

Abstract

With the growing literature on information asymmetry and industry 4.0 (IR4.0), a systematic review of the application of IR4 on mitigating information asymmetry is inevitable. Most of the existing literature focuses on management and computer science, and limited study links the analysis directly to the impact of technology on mitigating information asymmetry in corporate governance. Therefore, this study aims to fill in the literature gaps by refining and identifying the linkage between adoption IR4.0 or enabling technologies of IR4.0 (Blockchain, Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT) and Cloud Computing) related to mitigating information asymmetry. Firstly, the systematic review found 521 research articles from Scopus and Web of Science database and analysed nine articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review analysis found that blockchain technology plays a vital contribution in representing the enabling technologies of IR4.0. Most of the review analysis discussed blockchain technology on mitigating information asymmetry in corporate governance. Only one review article discussed widely with enabling technologies of IR4.0 on mitigating information asymmetry. However, the management field report was discussed too widely with theory and concepts related to computer science literature. Therefore, this study will focus on the discussion of blockchain technology on mitigating information asymmetry. The findings conclude that the enabling technologies of IR4.0 will mitigate information asymmetry in corporate governance in the form of enabling open information transactions, decentralised governance, representing faithfulness of financial reporting, promote smart contracts, and enhance market competitiveness and social welfare. Finally, this study emphasised a framework based on the systematic literature review which suggested that IR4.0 will be a new mechanism to mitigate information asymmetry in the corporate governance, which will directly influence the intention of the corporate governance players to mitigate information asymmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E., & Park, C. (1994). Concealment of negative organisational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1302–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, K. (2009). That “Internet of Things” thing. RFiD Journal, 22, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organisational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, C., & Wee, D. (2015, June). Manufacturing’s next act. McKinsey Quarterly. https://timereaction.com/papers/manufacturing_next_act.pdf

  • Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P. P., & Boyd, B. K. (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivie, S., Graffin, S. D., Oliver, A. G., & Withers, M. C. (2016). Come aboard! Exploring the effects of directorships in the executive labor market. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1681–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signalling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich, H. (2016). Ethereum: Blockchains, digital assets, smart contracts, decentralized autonomous organizations. Wildfire Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eling, M., & Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of digitalisation on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 43(3), 359–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, A., & Stanko, D. (2018). The wolf and the caribou: Coexistence of decentralised economies and competitive markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(2), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 670–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeley, M. B., Matusik, S. F., & Jain, N. (2007). Innovation, appropriability, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organisation theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 50, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H. (2013). Change through digitisation—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Management of permanent change (pp. 23–45). Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lie, E. (2005). On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Science, 51(5), 802–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B. (1998). Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organisation Science, 9(3), 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallig, J., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2019). Establishing the representational faithfulness of financial accounting information using multiparty security, network analysis and a blockchain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladineo, M., Veza, I., & Gjeldum, N. (2017). Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 55(9), 2506–2521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, D. E. (2017). Configuring blockchain architectures for transaction information in blockchain consortiums: The case of accounting and supply chainsystems. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 24(4), 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, D. E. (2018). Open information enterprise transactions: Business intelligence and wash and spoof transactions in blockchain and social commerce. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(3), 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsberg, B. (2018). Blockchain technology and the governance of foreign aid. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(3), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shermin, V. (2017). Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strategic Change, 26(5), 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. The American Economic Review, 92, 460–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, A., & Tandur, D. (2014, November). Wireless requirements and challenges in Industry 4.0. In 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) (pp. 634–638). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viriyasitavat, W., Da Xu, L., Bi, Z., & Sapsomboon, A. (2018). Blockchain-based businessprocess management (BPM) framework for service composition in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: A self-organised multi-agent system with big data-based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, 101, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., Lin, Z., & Tang, Q. (2019). Blockchain: The introduction and its application in financial accounting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(4), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Soda, G. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015, August). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2147–2152). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project was funded by the YTI-UKM Distinguish Chair (EP-2020-007) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Hasimi Yaacob .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yaacob, M.H., Thing, N.S., Alias, N. (2024). Bridging the Gap Between Information Asymmetry and IR4.0: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Abdul Karim, Z., Abdul Rahim, R., Wong, W.Y., Zakaria, S.F.D. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Finance, Investment and Banking in Malaysia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5447-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics