Abstract
With the growing literature on information asymmetry and industry 4.0 (IR4.0), a systematic review of the application of IR4 on mitigating information asymmetry is inevitable. Most of the existing literature focuses on management and computer science, and limited study links the analysis directly to the impact of technology on mitigating information asymmetry in corporate governance. Therefore, this study aims to fill in the literature gaps by refining and identifying the linkage between adoption IR4.0 or enabling technologies of IR4.0 (Blockchain, Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT) and Cloud Computing) related to mitigating information asymmetry. Firstly, the systematic review found 521 research articles from Scopus and Web of Science database and analysed nine articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review analysis found that blockchain technology plays a vital contribution in representing the enabling technologies of IR4.0. Most of the review analysis discussed blockchain technology on mitigating information asymmetry in corporate governance. Only one review article discussed widely with enabling technologies of IR4.0 on mitigating information asymmetry. However, the management field report was discussed too widely with theory and concepts related to computer science literature. Therefore, this study will focus on the discussion of blockchain technology on mitigating information asymmetry. The findings conclude that the enabling technologies of IR4.0 will mitigate information asymmetry in corporate governance in the form of enabling open information transactions, decentralised governance, representing faithfulness of financial reporting, promote smart contracts, and enhance market competitiveness and social welfare. Finally, this study emphasised a framework based on the systematic literature review which suggested that IR4.0 will be a new mechanism to mitigate information asymmetry in the corporate governance, which will directly influence the intention of the corporate governance players to mitigate information asymmetry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson, E., & Park, C. (1994). Concealment of negative organisational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1302–1334.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
Ashton, K. (2009). That “Internet of Things” thing. RFiD Journal, 22, 97–114.
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organisational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.
Baur, C., & Wee, D. (2015, June). Manufacturing’s next act. McKinsey Quarterly. https://timereaction.com/papers/manufacturing_next_act.pdf
Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P. P., & Boyd, B. K. (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158.
Boivie, S., Graffin, S. D., Oliver, A. G., & Withers, M. C. (2016). Come aboard! Exploring the effects of directorships in the executive labor market. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1681–1706.
Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797.
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signalling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.
Diedrich, H. (2016). Ethereum: Blockchains, digital assets, smart contracts, decentralized autonomous organizations. Wildfire Publishing.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
Eling, M., & Lehmann, M. (2018). The impact of digitalisation on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 43(3), 359–396.
Freund, A., & Stanko, D. (2018). The wolf and the caribou: Coexistence of decentralised economies and competitive markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(2), 26.
Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 921–955.
Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 670–680.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.
Heeley, M. B., Matusik, S. F., & Jain, N. (2007). Innovation, appropriability, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 209–225.
Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organisation theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 50, 319–339.
Kagermann, H. (2013). Change through digitisation—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Management of permanent change (pp. 23–45). Springer Gabler.
Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.
Lie, E. (2005). On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Science, 51(5), 802–812.
Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B. (1998). Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organisation Science, 9(3), 326–339.
McCallig, J., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2019). Establishing the representational faithfulness of financial accounting information using multiparty security, network analysis and a blockchain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.
Mladineo, M., Veza, I., & Gjeldum, N. (2017). Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 55(9), 2506–2521.
Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730–741.
O’Leary, D. E. (2017). Configuring blockchain architectures for transaction information in blockchain consortiums: The case of accounting and supply chainsystems. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 24(4), 138–147.
O’Leary, D. E. (2018). Open information enterprise transactions: Business intelligence and wash and spoof transactions in blockchain and social commerce. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 25(3), 148–158.
Reinsberg, B. (2018). Blockchain technology and the governance of foreign aid. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(3), 413–429.
Shermin, V. (2017). Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strategic Change, 26(5), 499–509.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. The American Economic Review, 92, 460–501.
Varghese, A., & Tandur, D. (2014, November). Wireless requirements and challenges in Industry 4.0. In 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) (pp. 634–638). IEEE.
Viriyasitavat, W., Da Xu, L., Bi, Z., & Sapsomboon, A. (2018). Blockchain-based businessprocess management (BPM) framework for service composition in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–12.
Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: A self-organised multi-agent system with big data-based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, 101, 158–168.
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962.
Yu, T., Lin, Z., & Tang, Q. (2019). Blockchain: The introduction and its application in financial accounting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 29(4), 37–47.
Zaheer, A., & Soda, G. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31.
Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015, August). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2147–2152). IEEE.
Acknowledgements
This research project was funded by the YTI-UKM Distinguish Chair (EP-2020-007) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yaacob, M.H., Thing, N.S., Alias, N. (2024). Bridging the Gap Between Information Asymmetry and IR4.0: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Abdul Karim, Z., Abdul Rahim, R., Wong, W.Y., Zakaria, S.F.D. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Finance, Investment and Banking in Malaysia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5447-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5447-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5446-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5447-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)