Skip to main content

SDN-Based Network Resource Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence for Modern Business Systems

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing demand for network resources. However, fixed contracts between users and providers tend to result in network use inefficiencies and high costs. To promote the best accommodation for high network demand and usage, a setup where every user has the most amount of network resources at his disposal is paramount—this way users minimize the risk of not having sufficient resources to meet their service needs, and providers maximize the usage of their networks. In this chapter, we consider a setup based on Software Defined Networking (SDN), where connections between users’ devices and providers’ nodes are defined according to resource needs and pricing. The adoption of an SDN-based approach is detrimental of other more distributed control alternatives is since the scenario under investigation is very specific and dynamic, which is more efficiently managed in a logical centralized way than in a decentralized way. In this direction, an auction SDN-based broker is proposed, so that both users and providers get the best deal for every resource-allocation procedure, according to all players’ needs and network restrictions. We present and discuss evaluation results taken from our auction business model. Our results suggest that the best bidding strategy depends on several aspects, namely: (i) the competitor’s bidding strategy; (ii) the operating cost of each participant; or (iii) the available resources of all participants and the broker’s requisites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The payment will most probably be part of a monthly subscription, which will include both the broker’s and provider’s fees.

References

  1. Heaven WD (2020) Why the coronavirus lockdown is making the internet stronger than ever. MIT Review

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hossain MS, Muhammad G, Guizani N (2020) Explainable AI and mass surveillance system-based healthcare framework to combat COVID-I9 like pandemics. IEEE Network 34(4):126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yassine A, Shirehjini AAN, Shirmohammadi S (2016) Bandwidth on-demand for multimedia big data transfer across geodistributed cloud data centers. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2016.2617369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yassine A, Singh S, Hossain MS, Muhammad G (2019) IoT big data analytics for smart homes with fog and cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 0167–739X, 91, pp 563–573

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen M et al (2018) Edge-CoCaCo: toward joint optimization of computation, caching, and communication on edge cloud. IEEE Wirel Commun 25(3):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hao Y et al (2019) Smart-edge-CoCaCo: AI-enabled smart edge with joint computation, caching, and communication in heterogeneous IoT. IEEE Network 33(2):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vickery W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16:8–37

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bahreini T, Badri H, Grosu D (2018) An envy-free auction mechanism for resource allocation in edge computing systems. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM symposium on edge computing (SEC). Seattle, WA, pp 313–322.https://doi.org/10.1109/SEC.2018.00030

  9. Baek B, Lee J, Peng Y, Park S (2020) Three dynamic pricing schemes for resource allocation of edge computing for IoT environment. IEEE Internet Things J 7(5):4292–4303. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2966627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Z, Yang Z, Xie S, Chen W, Liu K (2019) Credit-based payments for fast computing resource trading in edge-assisted Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J 6(4):6606–6617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun W, Liu J, Yue Y, Zhang H (2018) Double auction-based resource allocation for mobile edge computing in industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 14(10):4692–4701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tasiopoulos AG, Ascigil O, Psaras I, Pavlou G (2018) EdgeMAP: auction markets for edge resource provisioning. In: 2018 IEEE 19th international symposium on ”A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks” (WoWMoM). Chania, pp 14–22

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hossain MS, Muhammad G (2019) Emotion recognition using secure edge and cloud computing. Inf Sci 504(2019):589–601

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Tun YK, Tran NH, Ngo DT, Pandey SR, Han Z, Hong CS (2019) Wireless network slicing: generalized kelly mechanism-based resource allocation. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 37(8):1794–1807. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2019.2927100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Habiba U, Hossain E (2018) Auction mechanisms for virtualization in 5g cellular networks: basics, trends, and open challenges. In: IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol 20, no 3, pp 2264–2293. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2811395

  16. Zhang Y et al (2019) COCME: content-oriented caching on the mobile edge for wireless communications. IEEE Wirel Commun 26(3):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain MS, Muhammad G (2020) A deep-tree-model-based radio resource distribution for 5G networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 27(1):62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandholm T, Suri S, Gilpin A, Levine D (2005) CABOB: a fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Manage Sci 51(3):374–390

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang XW, Sun JJ, Li HX, Wu C, Huang M (2013) A reverse auction based allocation mechanism in the cloud computing environment. Appl Math Inf Sci 7(1):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abdulsalam Y, Hossain MS, COVID-19 networking demand: an auction-based mechanism for automated selection of edge computing services. In: IEEE transactions on network science and engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2020.3026637

  21. Le THT et al (2020) Auction mechanism for dynamic bandwidth allocation in multi-tenant edge computing. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 69(12):15162–15176. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.3036470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim DH et al (2020) Pricing mechanism for virtualized heterogeneous resources in wireless network virtualization. In: 2020 international conference on information networking (ICOIN). Barcelona, Spain, pp 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016477

  23. Barakabitze AA, Ahmad A, Mijumbi R, Hines A (2020) 5G network slicing using SDN and NFV: a survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges. In: Computer networks, vol 167, 106984, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samdanis K, Costa-Perez X, Sciancalepore V (2016) From network sharing to multi-tenancy: the 5G network slice broker. IEEE Commun Mag 54(7):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7514161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sciancalepore V, Costa-Perez X, Banchs A (2019) RL-NSB: reinforcement learning-based 5G network slice broker. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking 27(4):1543–1557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2019.2924471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng Q, He D, Zeadally S, Khan MK, Kumar N (2019) A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system. J Netw Comput Appl 126:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Salman T, Zolanvari M, Erbad A, Jain R, Samaka M (2019) Security services using blockchains: a state of the art survey. IEEE Commun Surveys Tuts 21(1):858–880

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang XY, Ho P (2011) Gossip-enabled stochastic channel negotiation for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 10(11):1632–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Capen E, Clapp R, Campbell W (1971) Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. J Petroleum Technol 23:641–653

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thaler R (1988) Anomalies: the winner’s curse. The J Econ Perspect 2:191–202

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elz R, Bush R, Bradner S, Patton M (1997) Selection and operation of secondary DNS servers. BCP 16, RFC 2182. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2182, https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2182

  32. Ongaro D, Ousterhout J (2014) In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In: USENIX conference

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rothkopf M, Harstad R (1994) Modeling competitive bidding: a critical essay. Manage Sci 40:364–384

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friedman L (1956) A competitive bidding strategy. Oper Res 4:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dougherty E, Nozaki M (1975) Determining optimum bid fraction. J Petrol Technol 27:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith B, Chase J (1975) Nash equilibria in a sealed bid auction. Manage Sci 22:487–497

    Google Scholar 

  37. McAfee R, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. J Econ Literature 25(2):699–738

    Google Scholar 

  38. Afolabi I, Taleb T, Samdanis K, Ksentini A, Flinck H (2018) Network slicing and softwarization: a survey on principles, enabling technologies and solutions. IEEE Commun Surveys Tuts 20(3):2429–2453

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ksentini A, Frangoudis PA, Amogh PC, Nikaein N (2018) Providing low latency guarantees for slicing-ready 5G systems via two-level MAC scheduling. IEEE Netw 32(6):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 3GPP “Study on management and orchestration of network slicing for next generation network, v15.0.0,” 3GPP SA5, Sophia Antipolis, France, Rep. 28.801, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sandhya Y, Sinha K (2017) Haribabu, “A survey: Hybrid SDN.” J Netw Comput Appl 100(2017):35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support given by Instituto de Telecomunicações, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

This publication/research was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia throught project grants FCT UIDB/04466/2020, UIDP/04466/2020 and UIDB/50008/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Carlos Marques Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Silva, J.C.M., Moura, J.A., Souto, N.M.B. (2024). SDN-Based Network Resource Management. In: Kautish, S., Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Pradeep, N., Singh, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence for Modern Business Systems . Disruptive Technologies and Digital Transformations for Society 5.0. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5354-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5354-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5353-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5354-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics