Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of Various Feature Extraction Methods for Classification of Pox Virus Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Congress on Control, Robotics, and Mechatronics (CRM 2023)

Abstract

After the COVID-19 pandemic, people began to fear that the monkeypox virus will be the next epidemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that monkeypox outbreaks have taken place in different regions of Central and West Africa throughout the years, with the latest outbreak being reported in Nigeria in May 2021. Fever, swollen lymph nodes, dry cough, and red rashes all manifest as signs of the monkeypox virus. Most of the symptoms of Measles and chickenpox are comparable. These disorders are given only methodical treatment by the doctor. In Image processing, feature extraction techniques are used to transform raw pixel values of an image into a set of features that can be used for further analysis, such as object recognition, image classification, and image retrieval. Several feature extraction techniques are employed to determine the disease from the images in order to determine which technique works best for this collection of monkeypox skin images (MSID). Wavelets fused with gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), Haralick features, and local binary pattern are the various feature extraction techniques (LBP) applied in this work. For the classification of various pox virus diseases such as measles, chicken pox, and monkeypox, various classification algorithms such as Random Forest Classification (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ada Boosting (AB), and Gradient Boosting (GB) are used in this work. In this paper, four evaluation metrics are used to determine the best feature extraction method for the monkeypox, chickenpox, and measles datasets. Wavelets fused with GLCM produce the highest accuracy (84.41% for gradient boosting and 83.87% for random forest) when extracting features from Monkeypox Skin Image Datasets (MSID).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sitaula, C., Shahi, T.B.: Monkeypox virus detection using pre-trained deep learning-based approaches. J. Med. Syst. 46(11), 1–9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riaz, A.: Monkeypox and Its outbreak. Pak BioMed J 5(8), 02–02 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i8.792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guarner, J., del Rio, C., Malani, P.N.: Mpox in 2022—What clinicians need to know. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35696257/. JAMA. Published online 13 June 2022. Accessed 17 June 2022

  4. Chen, B., Sumi, A., Wang, L., et al.: Role of meteorological conditions in reported chickenpox cases in Wuhan and Hong Kong, China. BMC Infect Dis 17, 538 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2640-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, L., et al. (eds): Measles. In: Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 26th edn. Elsevier (2020). https://www.clinicalkey.com. Accessed 7 Feb 2022

  6. Bala, D.: Monkeypox Skin Images Dataset (MSID). Kaggle (2022). https://doi.org/10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/3971903

  7. Aruraj, A., et al.:Detection and classification of diseases of banana plant using local binary pattern and support vector machine. In: 2019 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSPC). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hussain, L., et al.: Machine-learning classification of texture features of portable chest X-ray accurately classifies COVID-19 lung infection. Biomed Eng Online 19(1), 1–18 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perumal, V., Narayanan, V., Rajasekar, S.J.S.: Detection of COVID-19 using CXR and CT images using transfer learning and Haralick features. Appl Intell 51(1), 341–358 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azevedo Tosta, T.A., et al.: Evaluation of statistical and Haralick texture features for lymphoma histological images classification. Comput. Methods. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 9(6), 613–624 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal, S., Singh, R.: Detection and classification of lung diseases for pneumonia and Covid-19 using machine and deep learning techniques. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 1–21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tavakoli, S., et al.: New segmentation and feature extraction algorithm for classification of white blood cells in peripheral smear images. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–13 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sahin, V.H., Oztel, I., Oztel, G.Y.: Human monkeypox classification from skin lesion images with deep pre-trained network using mobile application. J. Med. Syst. 46(11), 1–10 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haque, Md., et al.: Classification of human monkeypox disease using deep learning models and attention mechanisms. arXiv:2211.15459 (2022)

  15. Dahea, W., Fadewar, H.S.: Finger vein recognition system based on multi-algorithm of fusion of Gabor filter and local binary pattern. In: 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC). IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sailasya, G., ArunaKumari, G.L.: Analyzing the performance of stroke prediction using ML classification algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 12(6) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Soofi, A.A., Awan, A.: Classification techniques in machine learning: applications and issues. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 13, 459–465 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pandey, P., Prabhakar, R.: An analysis of machine learning techniques (J48 & AdaBoost)-for classification. In: 2016 1st India International Conference on Information Processing (IICIP). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cahyana, N., Khomsah, S., Aribowo, A.S.: Improving imbalanced dataset classification using oversampling and gradient boosting. In: 2019 5th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hannah Inbarani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haripriya, K.P., Hannah Inbarani, H. (2024). Performance Analysis of Various Feature Extraction Methods for Classification of Pox Virus Images. In: Jha, P.K., Tripathi, B., Natarajan, E., Sharma, H. (eds) Proceedings of Congress on Control, Robotics, and Mechatronics. CRM 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 364. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5180-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5180-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5520-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5180-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics