Abstract
Whilst developing effective technological pedagogy can be a challenge, it is essential to realise that technology is here to stay, and it has the potential to enhance teaching and learning if used correctly. This inquiry explored the use of iPads to support the teaching of basic number knowledge inspired by the play-based learning approach in a new entrant class of learners. This study followed the Teaching as Inquiry model (TAI) which focuses on improving outcomes for students whilst guiding teachers as they learn from their practice (Sinnema and Aitken in Changing trajectories of teaching and learning. New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 2011). TAI presents three key components which are detailed as—focusing inquiry, teaching inquiry, and learning inquiry (Barker and Buntting in The professional practice of teaching in New Zealand. Cengage, pp. 23–55, 2016). The focusing inquiry component identified the outcomes for the learners and how the learners would achieve these outcomes. The teaching inquiry component identified the teaching strategies which were used to support learners to achieve these outcomes. The learning inquiry component looked at the results of the teaching and implications for future teaching. The iPad intervention for this inquiry was implemented during mathematics classes over a period of three weeks. Findings from this inquiry suggest that iPad application had a positive influence on a small group of learners’ number knowledge and problem-solving strategies, and that the pedagogical approaches used in integrating iPads in the mathematics lesson seem to have also contributed to their learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alhinty, M. (2015). Young language learners’ collaborative learning and social interaction as a motivational aspect of the iPad IEEE. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(2), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2014.7011106
Attard, C. (2013a). Teaching with technology: IPads and primary mathematics. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(4), 38–40.
Attard, C. (2013b). Introducing iPads into primary mathematics pedagogies: An exploration of two teachers’ experiences. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Attard, C., & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. Proceedings in the 35th Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Singapore.
Axford, C., Joosten, A. V., & Harris, C. (2018). iPad applications that required a range of motor skills promoted motor coordination in children commencing primary school. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12450
Barker, M., & Buntting, C. (2016). How do people learn? Understanding the learning process. In D. Fraser & M. Hill (Eds.), The professional practice of teaching in New Zealand (5th ed., pp. 23–55). Cengage.
Briand-Newman, H., Wong, M., & Evans, D. (2012). Teacher subject matter knowledge of number sense. Proceedings in the 35th Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Singapore.
Briggs, M., & Hansen, A. (2012). Play-based learning in the primary school. Sage.
Chigeza, P., & Sorin, R. (2016). Kindergarten children demonstrating numeracy concepts through drawings and explanations: Intentional teaching within play-based learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 65–77.
Cohrssen, C., Church, A., Ishimine, K., & Tayler, C. (2013). Playing with maths: Facilitating the learning in play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 95.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x
Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–98.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. http://aut.ac.nz
Duchesne, S., & McMaugh, A. (2016). Educational psychology: For learning and teaching. Cengage Learning.
Edwards, S. (2016). New concepts of play and the problem of technology, digital media and popular-culture integration with play-based Learning in early childhood education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 513–532.
Fleer, M. (2013). Digital positioning for inclusive practice in early childhood: The cultural practices surrounding digital tablets in family homes. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Teaching, Technology, 25(1–3), 56–76.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Herbal-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning our “patterns” of questioning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484–489.
Hilton, A. (2018). Engaging primary school students in mathematics: Can iPads make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 145–165.
Koehler, J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210.
Larkin, K. (2014). iPad apps that promote mathematical knowledge. Yes, they exist! Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 19(2), 28–32.
Larkin, K. (2016). Mathematics education and manipulatives: Which, when, how? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(1), 12–17.
Larkin, K., & Jorgensen, R. (2016). “I hate maths: Why do we need to do maths?” Using iPad video diaries to investigate attitudes and emotions towards mathematics in Year 3 and Year 6 students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 925–944.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Cast Professional Publishing.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media Limited.
Ministry of Education. (n.d). What is the number framework? https://nzmaths.co.nz
Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A, & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1).
Sewell, A., & St. George, A. (2016). Developing a community of learners. In D. Fraser & M. Hill (Eds.), The professional practice of teaching in New Zealand (5th ed., pp. 240–260). Cengage.
Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2011). Teaching as inquiry in the New Zealand curriculum: Origins and implementation. In J. Parr, H. Hedges, & S. May (Eds.), Changing trajectories of teaching and learning (pp. 29–48). New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Booth, I. (2023). Using Technology to Support My Teaching of Mathematics in a Play-Based Learning Environment. In: Jhagroo, J.R., Stringer, P.M. (eds) Professional Learning from Classroom-Based Inquiries. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5099-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5099-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5098-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5099-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)