Skip to main content

Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Approach in Nuclear Power and Space Sectors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Reliability and Safety Assessment for Critical Systems (NCRS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

Probabilistic Risk/Safety Assessment (PRA/PSA) is a comprehensive, structured, logical and a quantitative analysis technique to identify and assess risks in complex technological systems, to improve their safety and performance in a cost-effective manner. PRA methods were developed in the US aerospace industry. The nuclear sector adopted PRA techniques widely in 1980s after the Three Mile Island (TMI) accident. Thereon, the technique has advanced into an important risk management tool and is mandated by nuclear regulatory authorities worldwide. PRA has helped to strengthen the regulatory policies on safety, enhance system engineering, evaluate cost-effective design options, improve accident mitigation procedures and much more. In space industry, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) first used PRA in the operational phase of human space flight programs. Since its first comprehensive use post the Challenger Accident, it has been recognized as an effective method for assessing complex mission risks. Early integration of PRA with system and design engineering aided in increasing the reliability and availability of systems, crew safety and optimized lifecycle costs. PRA is now included as a requirement during the design phase of crewed space vehicles as well as for high priority robotic missions and other critical missions in the space sector. The paper provides an overview of the PRA practices in the nuclear and space sector, outlining the overall framework, objectives, definition of risk, regulations, standards and guidance for each sector. It compares the elements/tasks of nuclear and space PRA and addresses the limitations of a conventional PRA approach as well as the challenges in developing PRA models for space missions. The paper also highlights the significance of PRA and how it can be used as a useful risk management tool for space missions. The paper concludes by using the nuclear industry as an example to argue that PRA must be viewed as an essential requirement by space regulatory bodies to analyse the mission risk in a holistic manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Small deviation in plant parameters that could give rise to abnormal consequences.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) Development and application of level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants, IAEA Specific Safety Guide SSG-3

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2011) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners, 2nd edn. NASA/SP-2011-3421, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Atomic Energy Agency (2016) Safety of nuclear power plants: design. IAEA Specific Safety Requirements SSR-2/1 Rev. 1

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) Development and application of level 2 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants, IAEA Specific Safety Guide SSG-4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mosleh A (2014) PRA: a perspective on strengths, current limitations, and possible improvements, vol 46, no 1. Nuclear Engineering and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wiltbank NE, Palmer CJ (2021) Dynamic PRA prospects for the nuclear industry. Front Energy Res 9:750453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.750453,November

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (2019) Space systems-safety requirements, part 2: launch site operations, 3rd edn. ISO 14620: 2019, Dec 2019

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Organization for Standardization (2006) Space systems-safety and compatibility of materials, part 6: determination of reactivity of processing materials with aerospace fluids. ISO 14624: 2006, Apr 2006

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization for Standardization (2016) Space systems-risk management, 2nd edn. ISO 17666: 2016, Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Organization for Standardization (2019) Space systems-probabilistic risk assessment, 2nd edn. ISO 11231: 2019, May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2014), NASA system safety handbook, vol 2. System safety concepts, guidelines, and implementation examples, NASA/SP-2014-612, Version 1.0, Nov 2014

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2017) NASA agency risk management procedural requirements. NPR 8000.4, Dec 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musgrave G, Larsen A, Sgobba T (2009) Safety design for space systems (sponsored by the International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety). ISBN 978-0-7506-8580-1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Independent Space Safety Board (2010) Space safety standard commercial human-rated system. IAASS-ISSB-S-1700-D310806 (Rev-B3), Mar 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Space Safety Foundation (2021) Making space safe and sustainable. IAASS vision, proposals and initiatives to organize and regulate outer space, Dec 2021

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pelton JN, Jakhu RS (2010) IAASS book series on space safety—space safety regulations and standards. ISBN 978-1-85617-752-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Cooperation for Space Standardization (2009) ECSS-Q-ST-40C (Rev. 1), safety standard, Mar 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the Space Shuttle (1995) Phase 3: a study of the potential of losing the vehicle during nominal operation, NASA-CR-197808, vol 1 to 5, Feb 1995

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boyer RL (2010) Space shuttle probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA) iteration 3.2, NASA Johnson Space Center. In: Presented at TRISMAC 2010 conference, Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  20. RAND Corporation (2016) Developing a risk assessment methodology for NASA, RAND_RR1537. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9563-3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalia P, Pair R, Uhlenbrock J, Quaney V, Shi Y (2013) Use of a PRA in supporting the design of a GEOS weather satellite and ground system. Int J Perform Eng 9(6)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janaki Devi Kompella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kompella, J.D., Ravichandran, K., Anandan, V. (2023). Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Approach in Nuclear Power and Space Sectors. In: Senthil Kumar, C., Sujatha, R., Muthukumar, R., Rao, K.B., Prakash, R.V., Varde, P.V. (eds) Advances in Reliability and Safety Assessment for Critical Systems. NCRS 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5049-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5049-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5048-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5049-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics