Skip to main content

Volunteerism and Disaster Resilience in Thailand: Institutional Design for Reducing Migrant Workers’ Vulnerability to Floods in Thailand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Disaster Safer
  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

The growing role of volunteers in disasters has increased the recognition of volunteer efforts in disaster management. The role of volunteers varies between genders and the disaster management cycle. However, their involvement tends to be unplanned and short-term due to a lack of adequate institutional design of a formal disaster management process. This chapter challenges the assertion that volunteerism can only occur on a short-term basis and through an informal disaster management structure. To promote disaster resilience as a long-term outcome, a long-term evolving process through inclusive institutional design is needed to strengthen the positive cooperation of all stakeholders, including volunteers, particularly when formulating and implementing community disaster resilience. This chapter aims to raise awareness of the importance of people-centered and gender-inclusive approaches through volunteerism and disaster resilience by investigating the vulnerability of migrant workers during the 2011 flood in Thailand as a case study. The chapter concludes that volunteer engagement varies by gender role and can reduce vulnerability to disasters and improve resilience in the long term. However, without the proper channels for volunteers to collaborate with other formal actors, the good intentions of individual volunteers can cause problems and hinder long-term disaster resilience outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 1985 Mexico City Earthquake, also known as “Michoacan Earthquake of 1985,” was one of the world’s deadliest earthquakes, in which more than 9,500 people were killed by the 8.1 magnitude quake. The disaster occurred on September 19, 1985, in Mexico City, one of the world’s most populous metropolitan areas.

  2. 2.

    Hurricane Katrina was the largest, most costly, and fourth strongest hurricane in US history, surpassing Florida Keys Labor Day Hurricane in 1935, Hurricane Camille in 1969, and Hurricane Michael in 2018. This tropical cyclone hit the southeastern coast of the United States on August 29, 2005 and caused more than 1,800 deaths.

  3. 3.

    The 2003 Bam earthquake occurred on December 26, 2003, in Kerman province, Iran. The 6.6 Richter Scale earthquake caused more than 26,000 deaths, and almost 75,000 people became homeless.

  4. 4.

    The earthquake in Turkey in 1999, also called “Izmit Earthquake,” occurred on August 17, 1999. This devastating earthquake, with a magnitude of 7.4, damaged the industrialized and urban areas of Istanbul, Sakarya, Golcuk, Darica, and Derince. It is considered as one of the most damaging earthquakes in Turkey, in which there were around 17,000 deaths, and more than 250,000 people became homeless.

  5. 5.

    The Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004 caused tremendous damage to several countries in South and Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including Somalia, Sri Lanka, India, Maldives, Malaysia, Myanmar, Indonesia, and Thailand. The tsunami hit the coasts on December 26, 2004, starting from an undersea earthquake with a magnitude of 9.1. It killed more than 225,000 people.

  6. 6.

    The Nepal Earthquake occurred on April 25, 2015, with a magnitude of 7.8, in Central Nepal. Nearly 9,000 people were killed, and more than 600,000 families lost their homes.

References

  1. Aminizade, M., Nekouei Moghaddam, M., Birami Jam, M., Shamsi, M., Majidi, N., Amanat, N., & Hoseini, S. H. (2017). The role of volunteer citizens in response to accidents and disasters. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly, 2(3), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arpaporn, W. (2012). Thailand’s 2011 Flood crisis reveals potential of technology and social media in disaster response. The Asia Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Volunteering in the United States-2015. United States Department of Labor. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf

  4. Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cottrell, A. (2010). A survey of spontaneous volunteers, Australian red cross research report. James Cook University.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniels, A. K. (1988). Invisible careers: Women civic leaders from the volunteer world. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Differences in the economics decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In C. R. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (Vol. 1, pp. 1061–1076). North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Einolf, C. J. (2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1092–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fakhruddin, S. H. M., & Chivakidakarn, Y. (2014). A case study for early warning and disaster management in Thailand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 9, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2002). Preventing a disaster within the disaster: The effective use and management of unaffiliated volunteers. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Archive/202852NCJRS.pdf

  12. Flood donations abused, Bin admits. (2019). Bangkok Post. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1756679/flood-donations-abused-bin-admits

  13. Fothergill, A. (1996). Gender, risk, and disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 14(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frits, C. E., & Marks, E. S. (1954). NORC studies of human behavior in disaster. Journal of Social Issues, 10(3), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gray, L. (1993). The effect of drought and economic decline on rural women in Western Sudan. Geoforum, 24(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallegatte, S. (2008). An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 779–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaminer, W. (1984). Women volunteering: The pleasure, pain, and politics of unpaid work from 1830 to the present. Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kannika, K. (2017). Volunteers and the establishment of social justice. Journal of Graduate Volunteer Center, 14(1), 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larpsan, K. (2018). The civil defense volunteers’ participation on the prevention and mitigation mission. Journal of Research and Development Institute Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, 5(1), 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lebel, L., Manuta, J. B., & Garden, P. (2011). Institutional traps and vulnerability to changes in climate and flood regimes in Thailand. Regional Environmental Change, 11, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowe, S., & Fothergill, A. (2003). A need to help: Emergent volunteer behaviour after September 11th. In J. L. Monday (Ed.), Beyond September 11th: an account of post-disaster response (pp. 293–314), Special publication No. 39. Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  23. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Millican, P. (1993). Women in disaster. Symposium: Women in emergencies and disasters. Queensland Bureau of Emergency Services.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Reform Steering Assembly. (2017). The report on the development of public sector management: the reform of volunteering system in public sector, National Reform Steering Assembly. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/parliament_parcy/download/usergroup_disaster/2-21.pdf

  27. Nehnevajsa, J. (1989). Volunteering for emergency preparedness: Final report. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pailin, P. (2017). Women role in creating political equity and volunteering work in social development. PSDS Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piyakorn, W. (2013). Development of policy in regard of the Thai volunteers: From security to social development. Sripatum Chonburi Journal, 10(2), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rivers, J. P. W. (1982). Women and children last: An essay on sex discrimination in disasters. Disasters, 6(4), 256–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rooney, P., Steinberg, K. S., & Schervish, P. G. (2004). Methodology is destiny: The effect of survey prompts on reported levels of giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 628–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sakulsri, T., Tadee, R., & Trupp, A. (2017). Analyzing international migrant responses to crisis situations in the context of floods in Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 10(2), 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shaskolsky, L. (1967). Volunteerism in disaster situations. Preliminary paper no. 1. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spain, D. (2001). How women saved the city. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Suttathamkul, W. (2014). Legal problems on volunteer protections from tort liability. The Journal of Faculty of Law Chulalongkorn University 352–358.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thailand flooding death toll ‘tops 500’. (2011). BBC. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-15610536

  39. Tromans, E. (2011). Volunteers bring help to Thailand’s flood victims, Reliefweb. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://reliefweb.int/report/thailand/volunteers-bring-help-thailand%E2%80%99s-flood-victims

  40. Twigg, J., & Mosel, I. (2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environment and Urbanization, 29(2), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction [UNDRR]. (2020). Terminology. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://www.undrr.org/terminology/resilience

  42. United Nations Volunteers. (2011). State of the world’s volunteerism report universal values for global well-being: Chapter 7 volunteerism and disasters United Nations. Retrieved 1 October 2023 from https://volunteeringqld.org.au/docs/UNV_2018_State_of_the_Worlds_Vol_Report.pdf

  43. Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., & Handmer, J. (2015). A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Towards an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wolensky, R. P. (1979). Toward a broader conceptualization of volunteerism in disaster. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 8, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zubir, S., & Amirrol, H. (2011). Disaster risk reduction through community participation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 148, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanikun Chantra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chantra, T. (2023). Volunteerism and Disaster Resilience in Thailand: Institutional Design for Reducing Migrant Workers’ Vulnerability to Floods in Thailand. In: Alexander, R., Wajjwalku, S. (eds) Making Disaster Safer. Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4546-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics