Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychologische Ansätze zur Aufdeckung von Betrug

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus

  • 1066 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem vermeintlich wissenschaftlichen Zeitalter wurden Tests zur Aufdeckung von Betrug als Lösung für die Unzulänglichkeiten des indischen Strafrechtssystems vorgeschlagen. Könnte es jedoch sein, dass vielen dieser Ansätze die notwendige wissenschaftliche Grundlage zur Rechtfertigung ihrer Anwendung im Strafrechtssystem fehlt? Dieses Kapitel geht auf Hintergründe, Analyseverfahren und Einschränkungen verschiedener psychophysiologischer Methoden ein: Polygraph, Brain Mapping und Narkoanalyse. Die Zuverlässigkeit dieser Methoden wird ebenso untersucht wie die Zweckdienlichkeit ihrer weiteren oder zukünftigen Verwendung. Die Darstellung verschiedener Rechtsfälle aus Indien, in denen solche Maßnahmen in Prozessen und Entscheidungsfindungsprozessen eingesetzt wurden, wird begleitet von der Diskussion, welche Rolle diese Ansätze in Gerichtsverhandlungen spielen.

Die Autoren erkennen den Beitrag von Akshaya Krishnakumar für ihre Unterstützung bei der Dokumentation und Analyse der Fallstudien an, die in diesem Kapitel als Beispiele verwendet wurden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15(1), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnwal, A. K., & Sole, A. N. (2016). Development of narco analysis test as investigation technique in the criminal justice system: An Indian perspective. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(7), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2015, February 2nd). Is ‚brain fingerprinting‘ a breakthrough or a sham? The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2015/2/2/7951549/brain-fingerprinting-technology-unproven-courtroom-science-farwell-p300. Zugegriffen:16. Mar. 2020.

  • Carlsen, E., (2010). Truth in the machine. California Magazine, Cal Alumni Association. https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/spring-2010-searchlight-gray-areas/truth-machine. Zugegriffen:16. Mar. 2020.

  • DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage (Revised). W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farwell, L. A. (2012). Brain fingerprinting: A comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 6(2), 115–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A. (2010). Psychological third degree torture. Frontier Weekly, 42(52).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganis, G. (2018). Detecting deception and concealed information with neuroimaging. In J. P. Rosenfeld (Hrsg.), Detecting concealed information and deception: Recent developments (pp. 145–167). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganis, G., Rosenfeld, J. P., Meixner, J., Kievit, R. A., & Schendan, H. E. (2011). Lying in the scanner: Covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 55, 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannelli, P. C. (1985). Polygraph and deception tests. Public Defender Reporter, 8(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, H., Kakker, A., Ansari, N., Lodha, A., & Pandya, A. (2016). The deception clues in forensic contexts: The lie detection psychology. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1(3), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A. (1961). The use of drugs in interrogation. In A. D. Biderman, & H. Zimmer (Hrsg.), The manipulation of human behaviour (1. Aufl., pp. 96–141). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M. (2011). Methods in deception research. In B. Rosenfeld & S. Penrod (Hrsg.), Research methods in forensic psychology. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., & Voss, J. A. (2017). Lie detection guide: Theory and practice for investment professionals. CFA Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Does training improve the detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 43(3), 283–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesani, A. (2002). Medicine betrayed: Again and yet again. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 10(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kala, A. K. (2007). Of ethically compromising positions and blatant lies about ‚truth serum.‘ Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(1), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkaria, B. (2015, July 30th). How the 1993 blasts changed Mumbai forever. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33713846. Zugegriffen: 29. Mar. 2020.

  • Kaushal, Y. (2019, September 28th). Polygraph test raises suspicion on Panchkula Lawyer held for wife’s murder. Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/polygraph-test-raises-suspicion-on-panchkula-lawyer-held-for-wife-murder/story-mLRW6xFv9NWsk00vNpgasM.html. Zugegriffen: 20. Mar. 2020.

  • Khan, G. F. (2018). Narco analysis test: A blessing to criminal justice system, its reliability and admissibility in light of various Judgements. International Journal of Law, 4(2), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. (1982). On the fallibility of lie detection. Law and Society Review, 17(1), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshman, S. (2007). Narcoanalysis and some hard facts. Frontlines, 24(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal, S., & Vrij, A. (2008). Blinking during and after lying. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 32(4), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisofsky, N., Kazzer, P., Heekeren, H. R., & Prehn, K. (2014). Investigating socio-cognitive processes in deception: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 61, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokaneeta, J. (2018). Creating a flawed art of government: Legal discourses on lie detectors, brain scanning, and narcoanalysis in India. Law, Culture, and the Humanities, 14(3), 420–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G., Weiss, B., Dalos, V. D., Kilencz, T., Tudja, S., & Csifcsák, G. (2016). The first independent study on the complex trial protocol version of the P300-based concealed information test: Corroboration of previous findings and highlights on vulnerabilities. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Math, S. B. (2011). Supreme court judgment on polygraph, narco-analysis & brain-mapping: A boon or a bane. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 134(1), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, E. H., & Verschuere, B. (2017). Deception detection based on neuroimaging: Better than the polygraph? Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging, 8, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlberger, C. W. (1951). Interrogation under drug influence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 42(4), 513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection (pp. 11–28). The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofen, N., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Chai, X. J., Schwarzlose, R. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2017). Neural correlates of deception: Lying about past events and personal beliefs. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outlook India. (2004, February 10th). Telgi’s brain mapping confirms payments to Chhagan Bhujbal. Outlook. https://www.outlookindia.com/newswire/story/telgis-brain-mapping-confirms-payments-to-chhagan-bhujbal/20065. Zugegriffen:28. Mar. 2020.

  • Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19(5), 508–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preethi, D. S., & Nithin, M. D. (2011). Truth serum: Boon or just a vain glory? Journal of Karnataka Medico-Legal Society, 20(2), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricilla, H., & Arya, R. (2018). Polygraph and narco test in indian evidence law—Through case laws. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 120(5), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi, P., Kanchan, T., Das, S., & Daya, P. (2004). The truth behind lie detector. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 30(3), 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattenpal, D. (2017, October 12th). The curious case of narco tests in Aarushi-Hemraj murder mystery. The Quint. https://www.thequint.com/news/india/the-curious-case-of-narco-tests-in-aarushi-hemraj-murder-mystery. Zugegriffen: 28. Mar. 2020.

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRDC. (2010). The Ferreira case: All that is wrong with torture and narcoanalysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(21), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B. R. (2014). Forensic science in criminal investigations and trials (5. Aufl.). Universal Law Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2019, October 7th). Brain mapping test led to arrest of main accused. Millennium Post. http://www.millenniumpost.in/delhi/brain-mapping-test-led-to-arrest-of-main-accused-378350. Zugegriffen: 29. Mar. 2020.

  • Smt. Selvi & Ors Vs State of Karnataka. Smt. Selvi & Ors Vs State of Karnataka Judgment on 5th May 2010. (Criminal Appeal No. 1267 of 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunny, S. (2019, October 9th). Love story, murder, cover up: How cops cracked 8-yr-old murder case. Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/bones-exhumed-to-crack-eight-year-old-murder-case/story-N36ptYDu7EeScZneXEJ6zH.html. Zugegriffen: 20. Mar. 2020.

  • The Times of India (2007, August 17th). Abu Salem sings under narco test. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Abu-Salem-sings-under-narco-test/articleshow/2286455.cms. Zugegriffen: 27. Mar. 2020.

  • Verleger, R., Baur, N., Metzner, M. F., & Śmigasiewicz, K. (2014). The hard oddball: Effects of difficult response selection on stimulus-related P3 and on response-related negative potentials: Oddball-P3 and S-R mapping. Psychophysiology, 51, 1089–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verleger, R., Hamann, L. M., Asanowicz, D., & Śmigasiewicz, K. (2015). Testing the S-R link hypothesis of P3b: The oddball effect on S1-evoked P3 gets reduced by increased task relevance of S2. Biological Psychology, 108, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(6), 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behaviour, 32(3), 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R., Watt, C., ten Brinke, L., Porter, S., Couper. S-L., & Rankin, C. (2012). The eyes don’t have it: Lie detection and neuro-linguistic programming. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 14). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O. P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India

    Sanjeev P. Sahni & Lukus Langan

Authors
  1. Sanjeev P. Sahni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lukus Langan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev P. Sahni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Jindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India

    Sanjeev P. Sahni

  2. Jindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India

    Poulomi Bhadra

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahni, S.P., Langan, L. (2023). Psychologische Ansätze zur Aufdeckung von Betrug. In: Sahni, S.P., Bhadra, P. (eds) Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4316-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4316-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4315-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4316-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation