Skip to main content

An Essay on the Realism of Management Theory: The Actuality of Management Phenomena and the Reality of Management Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Realism for Social Sciences

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 36))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the ‘realism’ that exists between the phenomenon of management and the ‘management theory’ or ‘conceptual schemes’ that try to capture it from a certain perspective. Here, we refer to “reality within phenomena” as “actuality,” and the kind of virtual reality that researchers perceive through “theories” and “conceptual frameworks” as “reality.” To explore the relationship between actuality and reality is main theme. When considering this theme, we follow two steps. At the first step, consider the relationship between the observer (for example, a researcher) and the business phenomenon that is its object. At the second step, after taking up and characterizing two representative positions in the history of American management theory, namely, the “clinical method” and the “scientific method,” shows these two positions are incorporated into the practice of management. We also point out that these two positions exist simultaneously. By these discussions, we would like to consider the relationship between “realism” and “methodology” in management study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    What I mean by “pragmatism” here is that Bernard analyzes “truth” in terms of the purpose of people’s actions and the validity of their purposes, rather than in terms of their essence. This is reminiscent of James’s view of truth. In other words, I believe that Bernard’s attitude is that there is no “essential truth” behind either “scientific knowledge” or “clinical knowledge” in a positive sense.

  2. 2.

    See the last chapter in Barnard (1938) for more information.

  3. 3.

    The basis of this method is the “clinical method” (the Hippocratic method in medicine) advocated by Henderson. Katsuyasu Kato explains it as follows: First, doctors gain “intuitive familiarity” (intuitive familiarity with things) by working continuously, wisely, and responsibly in the hospital room (not in the laboratory or library). Second, from the above perspective, to observe things and events in character, and to select, categorize, and systematize salient and recurring phenomena. Third, to create a correct theory based on the above—a kind of “walking stick” that helps one to walk without elbowing one’s shoulders (Kato, 1996, p. 418).

  4. 4.

    The definition of “logical positivism” varies widely, but here it is defined as “a methodology to analyze a phenomenon by deductively deriving a hypothesis (proposition) from an existing established theory (or inductively from experience), verifying or disproving it in light of reality, and determining the ‘truth or falsehood’ of the theory.” That is, the truth or falsehood of a theory is determined by the success or failure of logical procedures.

References

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, K. (1996). Bernard to Henderson: The function of the executive no keisei katei (Bernard and Henderson: Formation process of the functions of the executive) [in Japanese]. Bunshindo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsui, I. (2009). Shakai-teki networking ron no genryu: M. P. Follett no shiso (The origin of social networking theory: The thought of M. P. Follett) [in Japanese]. Bunshindo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsui, I. (2021). M. P. Follett no ‘Koshoku’ gainen no kanousei: Covid-19 ikou no aratana shakai no sozo ni mukete (Applicability of the concept of M.P. Follett’s concept of ‘inter-weaving’: Toward the creating process of new society after Covid-19 pandemic) [in Japanese]. Kanto Gakuin Journal of Economics and Management, 282, 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1980). From a logical point of view (2nd ed., revised). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J. (1941). Management and morale. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomita, Y. (1994). Quine to gendai America tetsugaku (Quine and contemporary American philosophy) [in Japanese]. Gendai Shisosha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W. B., & Iino, H. (Eds.). (1986). Philosophy for managers; Selected papers of Chester I. Barnard. Bunshindo Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izumi Mitsui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mitsui, I. (2023). An Essay on the Realism of Management Theory: The Actuality of Management Phenomena and the Reality of Management Theory. In: Urai, K., Katsuragi, M., Takeuchi, Y. (eds) Realism for Social Sciences. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 36. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4153-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4153-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4152-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4153-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics