Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to explore the ‘realism’ that exists between the phenomenon of management and the ‘management theory’ or ‘conceptual schemes’ that try to capture it from a certain perspective. Here, we refer to “reality within phenomena” as “actuality,” and the kind of virtual reality that researchers perceive through “theories” and “conceptual frameworks” as “reality.” To explore the relationship between actuality and reality is main theme. When considering this theme, we follow two steps. At the first step, consider the relationship between the observer (for example, a researcher) and the business phenomenon that is its object. At the second step, after taking up and characterizing two representative positions in the history of American management theory, namely, the “clinical method” and the “scientific method,” shows these two positions are incorporated into the practice of management. We also point out that these two positions exist simultaneously. By these discussions, we would like to consider the relationship between “realism” and “methodology” in management study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
What I mean by “pragmatism” here is that Bernard analyzes “truth” in terms of the purpose of people’s actions and the validity of their purposes, rather than in terms of their essence. This is reminiscent of James’s view of truth. In other words, I believe that Bernard’s attitude is that there is no “essential truth” behind either “scientific knowledge” or “clinical knowledge” in a positive sense.
- 2.
See the last chapter in Barnard (1938) for more information.
- 3.
The basis of this method is the “clinical method” (the Hippocratic method in medicine) advocated by Henderson. Katsuyasu Kato explains it as follows: First, doctors gain “intuitive familiarity” (intuitive familiarity with things) by working continuously, wisely, and responsibly in the hospital room (not in the laboratory or library). Second, from the above perspective, to observe things and events in character, and to select, categorize, and systematize salient and recurring phenomena. Third, to create a correct theory based on the above—a kind of “walking stick” that helps one to walk without elbowing one’s shoulders (Kato, 1996, p. 418).
- 4.
The definition of “logical positivism” varies widely, but here it is defined as “a methodology to analyze a phenomenon by deductively deriving a hypothesis (proposition) from an existing established theory (or inductively from experience), verifying or disproving it in light of reality, and determining the ‘truth or falsehood’ of the theory.” That is, the truth or falsehood of a theory is determined by the success or failure of logical procedures.
References
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Longmans, Green.
Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. Longmans, Green.
Kato, K. (1996). Bernard to Henderson: The function of the executive no keisei katei (Bernard and Henderson: Formation process of the functions of the executive) [in Japanese]. Bunshindo.
Mitsui, I. (2009). Shakai-teki networking ron no genryu: M. P. Follett no shiso (The origin of social networking theory: The thought of M. P. Follett) [in Japanese]. Bunshindo.
Mitsui, I. (2021). M. P. Follett no ‘Koshoku’ gainen no kanousei: Covid-19 ikou no aratana shakai no sozo ni mukete (Applicability of the concept of M.P. Follett’s concept of ‘inter-weaving’: Toward the creating process of new society after Covid-19 pandemic) [in Japanese]. Kanto Gakuin Journal of Economics and Management, 282, 34–47.
Quine, W. V. O. (1980). From a logical point of view (2nd ed., revised). Harvard University Press.
Roethlisberger, F. J. (1941). Management and morale. Harvard University Press.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). Free Press.
Tomita, Y. (1994). Quine to gendai America tetsugaku (Quine and contemporary American philosophy) [in Japanese]. Gendai Shisosha.
Wolf, W. B., & Iino, H. (Eds.). (1986). Philosophy for managers; Selected papers of Chester I. Barnard. Bunshindo Publishing Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitsui, I. (2023). An Essay on the Realism of Management Theory: The Actuality of Management Phenomena and the Reality of Management Theory. In: Urai, K., Katsuragi, M., Takeuchi, Y. (eds) Realism for Social Sciences. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 36. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4153-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4153-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4152-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4153-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)