Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gendered Occupational Segregation and Its Cost in India: Evidence from NSSO Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risks and Resilience of Emerging Economies

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

Research on gender-based occupational segregation and its costs in developing countries like India is an under-researched area. This paper estimates the level of gender-based occupational segregation in India, decomposes the estimate into endowment effect and “unexplained” component (referred to as discrimination), and estimates the cost of gender-based segregation in terms of wage loss of female workers. The study is based on the two rounds of NSSO data (61st and 68th rounds). The results reveal an increase in occupational segregation across gender at the all-India level and for most states. About 30% (in the 61st round) to 22% (in the 68th round) of the segregation index may be due to unexplained factors. Such gender-based segregation has resulted in the lowering of GDP by 11% in the 61st round and 1% in the 68th round. The study advocates encouraging educational programmes for school-going female students to promote the choice of atypical occupations, encouraging vocational training programs for female workers and addressing gender biases in institutional practices like selection, recruitment, and promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    World Bank Report, 2015 shows that very few women are found to be in managerial positions and on average, women earn 10–30 percentage points lower than men.

References

  • Agrawal, T. (2013). Are there glass-ceiling and sticky-floor effects in India? An empirical examination. Oxford Development Studies, 41(3), 322–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anker, R., & Hein, C. (1985). Why third world urban employers usually prefer men. International Laboratory Review, 124(1), 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, R. (1998). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, R., Melkas, H., & Korten, A. (2003). Gender-based occupational segregation in the 1990s (Vol. 16). Genève: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albelda, R. P. (1986). Occupational segregation by race and gender, 1958–1981. ILR Review, 39(3), 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, A. H. (1982). Occupational segregation by sex: Determinants and changes. Journal of Human Resources, 17(3), 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Ferber. A. M. (1992). Women’s contribution to labor economics: Part II. CSWEP Newsletter 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. M., Jarman, J., & Siltanen, J. (1993). The analysis of occupational gender segregation over time and place: Considerations of measurement and some new evidence. Work, Employment and Society, 7(3), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. M., & Marsh, C. (1991). Education and social class: Revisiting the 1944 Education Act with fixed marginals. British Journal of Sociology, 42(4), 507–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1976). Handbook of international data on women. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. J., Pagán, J. A., & Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (1999). Occupational attainment and gender earnings differentials in Mexico. ILR Review, 53(1), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartmill, R. S. (1999). Occupational sex segregation in global perspective: Comparative analyses of developed and developing nations. CDE Working Paper (pp. 99–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, R., & Verick, S. (2014). Female labour force participation in India and beyond (pp. 1–32). ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (1995). Models for describing the underlying structure of sex segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 931–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (1992). Cross-national variation in occupational sex segregation. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, M., Chakraborty, S., & Anker, R. (2013). Sex segregation in India’s formal manufacturing sector. International Labour Review, 152(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S. (2013). Occupational gender segregation in India. Journal of Economics, 1(2), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coré, F. (1999). The continuing saga of labour market segregation. OECD Observer 42–43. http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php?aid=88

  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy, M., & Duraisamy, P. (2014). Occupational segregation, wage and job discrimination against women across social groups in the Indian labor market : 1983–2010. In American Economic Association: ASSA Annual Meeting. Philadelphia: American Economic Association. December 2014 (pp. 1–19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duraisamy, M., & Duraisamy, P. (2016). Gender wage gap across the wage distribution in different segments of the Indian labour market, 1983–2012: Exploring the glass ceiling or sticky floor phenomenon. Applied Economics, 48(43), 4098–4111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W. (2005). An extension of the blinder-oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30(4), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoli, F., Koczan, Z., & Topalova, P. (2018). Drivers of labor force participation in advanced economies: Macro and micro evidence. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (1981). Job segregation: Trends in the 1970s. Employment Gazette, 89(December), 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (1958). Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, C111, 4 June 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. 2016. Women at Work: Trends 2016, 8 March 2016, ILO Office, Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_457317.pdf

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Lim, S. T. (1992). Trends in occupational and industrial sex segregation in 56 countries, 1960–1980. Work and Occupations, 19(4), 450–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, D. R., & Taeuber, K. E. (1985). Measures of segregation. Sociological Methodology, 15, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmel, T., & MacLachlan, M. (1988). Occupational sex segregation—Increasing or decreasing? Economic Record, 64(3), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khitarishvili, T., Rodriguez Chamussy, L., & Sinha, N. (2018). Occupational segregation and declining gender wage gap: The case of Georgia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8583). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/133851536843571958/Occupational-Segregation-and-Declining-Gender-Wage-Gap-The-Case-of-Georgia

  • King, M. C. (1992). Occupational segregation by race and sex, 1940–88. Monthly Labor Review, 115(4), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. E. (1985). The sources of changes in the occupational segregation of Australian women. Economic Record, 61(4), 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1980). Women in employment. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustagi, P. (2010). Continuing gender stereotypes or signs of change: Occupational patterns of women workers. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics., 53(3), 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguino, S. (2000). Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H. (2018). A state level analysis of gender occupational segregation in India. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(6), 2688–2702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber, J. G. (1989). On the measurement of employment segregation. Economics Letters, 30(3), 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltanen, J., Jarman, J., & Blackburn, R. M. (1995). Gender inequality in the labour market: Occupational concentration and segregation. International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27(3), 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Workers in urban India: Changes in gender segregation of occupations, 1983–2000. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uppal, A. (2007). Gender discrimination in quality of employment and wages in unorganized manufacturing sector of India. Gender Issues and Empowerment of Women Platinum Jubilee of Indian Statistical Institute, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentova, M., Krizova, I., & Katrnak, T. (2007). Occupational Gender Segregation in the light of the Segregation in Education: A Cross-National Comparison. An Integrated Research Infrastructure in the Socio-economic Sciences. IRISS Working Paper Series 2007–04. Verick, S. 2014. Female labor force participation in developing countries. IZA World of Labor. International Labor Organization: 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (1988). Women workers and global restructuring. ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M., & Rich, J. (1993). Occupational sex segregation in Britain, 1979–1989: The persistence of sexual stereotyping. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(2), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, K. A., Newhart, M., & Gelbgiser, D. (2018). Occupational segregation. In State of the Union 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/9191/WDR2011_0024.pdf?sequence=2

  • The World Bank. (2015). Gender at Work: A Companion to the World Development Report on Jobs. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Event/Gender/GenderAtWork_web2.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions that substantially improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, 700073, India

    Suchetana Das, Riya Basu, Utsav Biswas, Anuska Das & Mousumi Dutta

Authors
  1. Suchetana Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Riya Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Utsav Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anuska Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mousumi Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mousumi Dutta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Tanmoyee Banerjee Chatterjee

  2. Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Arpita Ghose

  3. Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Poulomi Roy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, S., Basu, R., Biswas, U., Das, A., Dutta, M. (2023). Gendered Occupational Segregation and Its Cost in India: Evidence from NSSO Data. In: Chatterjee, T.B., Ghose, A., Roy, P. (eds) Risks and Resilience of Emerging Economies. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4063-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation