Abstract
Earthquake-induced landslide hazard is the most serious threat in seismo-tectonically active mountains like the Himalayas. It has frequently been noted that the damage caused by earthquake-induced landslides is significantly greater than the earthquake itself. Therefore, assessing the susceptible zones of earthquake-induced landslides in seismically active areas is essential. In this study, the probabilistic hazard assessment of the earthquake-induced landslides has been conducted for the Goriganga Valley, Kumaun Himalaya. Numerous studies indicate that a great earthquake of magnitude 8 Mw or higher could strike this area at any time. Hence, mapping earthquake-induced landslides using an improved Newmark's model has been conducted for earthquakes of magnitude 8 Mw. The inclusion of arias intensity to estimate the permanent displacement of the slope for future scenario earthquakes make this work unique from others. The model provides the permanent displacements of potential slopes, which is the function of shear strength parameters of jointed rock mass, the inclination angle of valley slopes, and the arias intensity of the area. It provides the spatial distribution of possible slope failures in the area. It has been noted that ~25% of the study area is susceptible to earthquake-induced landslides when subjected to direct shaking of an earthquake of magnitude 8 Mw. The results of this work provide great insight to planners and civil engineers for hazard mitigation and assessment of the study region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arias A (1970) Measure of earthquake intensity. Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge. Univ. of Chile, Santiago de Chile
Barton N (1971) A relationship between joint roughness and joint shear Strength. Rock Fract Int Symp Rock Mech Nancy, Fr paper1–8
Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332
Coulson JH (1972) Shear strength of flat surfaces in rock. Proc 13th Symp on Rock Mech Urbana, vol Ill, pp 77–105
Cruden DM (1991) A simple definition of a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol—Bull L’association Int Géologie L’ingénieur 43:27–29
Duncan N (1969) Engineering geology and rock mechanics, vols 1 and 2
Duncan N, Sheerman-Chase A (1965–1966) Planning design and construction-rock mechanics in civil engineering works. Civ Eng Public Work Rev 61: 213–215
Gupta K, Satyam N (2022) Co-seismic landslide hazard assessment of Uttarakhand state (India) based on the modified Newmark model. J Asian Earth Sci: X 8:100120
Gupta V, Kumar S, Kaur R, Tandon RS (2022) Regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment for the hilly state of Uttarakhand, NW Himalaya, India. J Earth Syst Sci 131(1):2
Gupta V, Paul A, Kumar S, Dash B (2021) Spatial distribution of landslides vis-à-vis epicentral distribution of earthquakes in the vicinity of the main central thrust zone, Uttarakhand Himalaya India. Curr Sci 120(12):1927–1932
Hsieh SY, Lee CT (2011) Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Eng Geol 122(1–2):34–42
Huang D, Wang G, Du C et al (2020) An integrated SEM-Newmark model for physics-based regional coseismic landslide assessment. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 132:106066
Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58:271–289
Joshi SA, Sah SK et al (2019) Modeling of 2011 IndoNepal earthquake and scenario earthquakes in the Kumaon Region and comparative attenuation study using PGA distribution with the Garhwal Region. Pure Appl Geophys 176: 4687–4700.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02232-1
Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95(4):406–421
Khattri KM, Tyagi AK (1983) Seismicity patterns in the Himalayan plate boundary and identification of the areas of high seismic potential. Tectonophysics 96:281–297
Kumar S, Gupta V (2021) Evaluation of spatial probability of landslides using bivariate and multivariate approaches in the Goriganga valley, Kumaun Himalaya, India. Nat Hazards 109(3):2461–2488
Kumar S, Gupta V, Kumar P, Sundriyal YP (2021) Coseismic landslide hazard assessment for the future scenario earthquakes in the Kumaun Himalaya, India. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(7):5219–5235
Luirei K, Pant PD, Kothyari GC (2006) Geomorphic evidences of neotectonic movements in Dharchula area, northeast Kumaun: a perspective of the recent tectonic activity. J Geol Soc India 67:92–100
Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15:139–160
Owen LA, Kamp U, Khattak GA et al (2008) Landslides triggered by the 8 October 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Geomorphology 94:1–9
Rathje EM, Saygili G (2009) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake-induced sliding displacements of natural slopes. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng 42:18–27
Roback K, Clark MK, West AJ et al (2018) The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Geomorphology 301:121–138
Sepúlveda SA (2022) Earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility and hazard assessment approaches. In: Coseismic landslides. Springer, Singapore, pp 543–571
Strom A, Wang G (2022) Some earthquake-induced rockslides in the central Asia region. In: Coseismic Landslides. Springer, Singapore, pp 143–168
Valdiya KS (1980) Geology of kumaun lesser Himalaya. Wadia Inst Himal Geol Rajpur Road Dehradun Himachal times Press, p 280
Wang KL, Lin ML (2010) Development of shallow seismic landslide potential map based on Newmark’s displacement: the case study of Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Environ Earth Sci 60:775–785
Wilson RC, Keefer DK (1984) Dynamic analysis of a slope failure from the 6 August 1979 Coyote Lake, California, earthquake. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 21:220–221
Wu JH, Tsai PH (2011) New dynamic procedure for back-calculating the shear strength parameters of large landslides. Eng Geol 123:129–147
Yang Q, Zhu B, Hiraishi T (2021) Probabilistic evaluation of the seismic stability of infinite submarine slopes integrating the enhanced Newmark method and random field. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–19
Zang M, Qi S, Zou Y et al (2020) An improved method of Newmark analysis for mapping hazards of coseismic landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:713–726
Acknowledgements
The Authors from Geology Department, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University (A Central University) are thankful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India for providing financial support vide project no. DST/CCP/MRDP/187/2019(G) dated 29/06/2020, and we are grateful to the Vice-Chancellor for providing full cooperation. The author PK and VG sincerely acknowledged the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, S., Kumar, P., Kaushik, S., Sundriyal, Y., Gupta, V. (2023). Spatial Prediction of Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptible Zones—A Case Study from Indian Himalaya. In: Sandeep, Kumar, P., Mittal, H., Kumar, R. (eds) Geohazards. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 53. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3955-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3955-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3954-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3955-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)