Abstract
The plate anchor uplift capacity using geosynthetics was investigated in the present research study. The 1 g laboratory pullout model tests were carried out in the test tank having dimensions of 1000 mm × 1000 mm × 1000 mm using a circular shape anchor size (D) of 100 mm. The embedment depth of plate anchors in a sand bed having a relative density of 70% was 400 mm. Two numbers of polypropylene geotextiles having each size (Bg) of 2D were used to improve plate anchor’s uplift capacity. Two different model tests were performed by maintaining the vertical spacing (h) of 0.5D from the anchor plate above placed geotextile and placing the two numbers of geotextiles directly above the anchor plate i.e., h = 0.0D. The present test results reveal that the geotextiles which were placed directly above the anchor plate (0.0D) show a higher improvement in comparison to the spaced geotextiles (0.5D). It could be due to the influence of reinforcement tensile stiffness property which plays a vital role as compared to the reinforcement’s interface frictional property.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Krishnaswamy NR, Parashar SP (1994) Uplift behaviour of plate anchors with geosynthetics. Geotext Geomembr 13(2):67–89
Kishor Kumar V, Ilamparuthi K (2020) Performance of anchor in sand with different forms of geosynthetic reinforcement. Geosynth Int 27(5):503–522
Giffels WC, Graham RE, Mook JF (1960) Concrete cylinder anchors proved for 345-KV tower line. Electr World 154:46–49
Adams JI, Hayes DC (1967) The uplift capacity of shallow foundations. Ontario Hydro Res Q 19(1):1–13
Ilamparuthi K, Dickin EA (2001) Predictions of the uplift response of model belled piles in geogrid-cell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19(2):89–109
Ravichandran PT (2008) Investigations on uplift response of anchors in sand with and without reinforcement. PhD thesis, Anna University, India
ASTM D6913 (2017) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (Gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken
IS: 2720-13 (1986) Methods of test for soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
ASTM D5199 (2012) Standard test method for measuring the nominal thickness of geosynthetics. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken
ASTM D5261 (2018) Standard test method for measuring mass per unit area of geotextiles. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken
ASTM D4595 (2017) Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken
Rahimi M, Tafreshi SM, Leshchinsky B, Dawson AR (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation of the uplift capacity of plate anchors in geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 46(6):801–816
Ilamparuthi K, Dickin EA, Muthukrisnaiah K (2002) Experimental investigation of the uplift behaviour of circular plate anchors embedded in sand. Can Geotech J 39(3):648–664
Ilamparuthi K, Dickin EA (2001) The influence of soil reinforcement on the uplift behaviour of belled piles embedded in sand. Geotext Geomembr 19(1):1–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Venkatesh, B., Eswara Reddy, O., Sravani, E., Sai Naresh, B., Dinesh Kumar, G. (2024). Effect of Geosynthetics Position on Shallow Anchor Uplift Capacity. In: Pathak, K.K., Bandara, J.M.S.J., Agrawal, R. (eds) Latest Developments in Civil Engineering. RACE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 352. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2676-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2676-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2675-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2676-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)