Skip to main content

Fault Detection, Classification, and Location in Underground Cables

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power Quality in Microgrids: Issues, Challenges and Mitigation Techniques

Abstract

Underground (UG) cables have become widespread in the present scenario as these cables' durability is high and there are fewer environmental issues. With time, the insulation of the UG cables begins to deteriorate. As a result, their conduction efficiency decreases. To achieve the integrity of an underground cable, it is vital to accurately identify a faulty segment to limit the amount of time that the system is unavailable during a fault. Therefore, a fast and accurate fault detection approach is necessary to expedite system restoration, reduce outage duration, minimize economic losses, and considerably increase system reliability. There are several traditional techniques used for fault classification and localization and those are arduous, sluggish, and computationally intensive, they are reliant on mathematical modeling and necessitate specialized skill. To overcome such problems, several artificial intelligence approaches such as machine learning techniques as well as deep learning methods have been deliberated in this chapter. The above-mentioned approaches are considered for fault location, classification, and detection in the UG cable. All the methods are taken from some conference papers, journals, and e-books from 2002 to 2022. The benefits and drawbacks of all fault diagnosis approaches have also been explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ML:

Machine learning

DL:

Deep learning

ANFIS:

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system

ANN:

Artificial neural network

FLS:

Fuzzy logic system

SVM:

Support vector machine

CNN:

Convolutional neural network

RNN:

Recurrent neural network

LSTM:

Long short-term memory

SUGPD:

Smart underground power distribution system

ADAGRAD:

Adaptive gradient descent

RMSPROP:

Root mean square prop

ADAM:

Adaptive moment estimation

DBN:

Deep belief network

GRNN:

General Regression neural network

PT:

Potential transformer

CT:

Current transformer

References

  1. Orton H (2013) History of underground power cables. IEEE Electr Insul Mag 29:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEI.2013.6545260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salkuti SR (2022) Emerging and advanced green energy technologies for sustainable and resilient future grid. Energies 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186667

  3. Swamy BYVNR, Rama Krishna D, Pruna Chandu CH, Venkatesh K, Sasidhar Reddy A (2018) Underground cable fault detection. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 6(3):3060–3064. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.3663

  4. Hans MR, Kor SC, Patil AS (2017) Identification of underground cable fault location and development. In: International conference on data management, analytics, and innovation, ICDMAI 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 5–8 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMAI.2017.8073476

  5. Asif RM, Hassan SR, Rehman AU et al (2020) Smart underground wireless cable fault detection and monitoring system. In: International conference on engineering and emerging technologies, ICEET 2020. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET48479.2020.9048210

  6. Sinha T, Ray P, Salkuti SR (2018) Protection coordination in microgrid using fault current limiters. J Green Eng 8(2):125–150. https://doi.org/10.13052/jge1904-4720.822

  7. Chandra S, Chanki R, Prashant P, Rajpoot S, Kumar S (2021) A dynamic SUGPDS model for faults detection and isolation of underground power cable based on detection and isolation algorithm and smart sensors. J Electr Eng Technol 16(4):1799–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-021-00715-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra S, Patra S, Swain SC, Routray A (2021) Parameter estimation for underground cable fault using stochastic optimization. IECON proceedings—industrial electronics conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589994

  9. Jia H (2017) An improved traveling-wave-based fault location method with compensating the dispersion effect of traveling wave in wavelet domain. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1019591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das S, Santoso S, Gaikwad A, Patel M (2014) Impedance-based fault location in transmission networks: theory and application. IEEE Access 2:537–557. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2323353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmerman K, Costello D (2005) Impedance-based fault location experience. In: 58th annual conference for protective relay engineers. College Station, TX, USA, pp 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1109/CPRE.2005.1430435

  12. Min SW, Nam SR, Kang SH, Park JK (2007) Fault location algorithm for cross-bonded cables using the singularity of the sheath impedance matrix. Electr Eng 89(7):525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-006-0035-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Helles SM, Hvidsten S, Balog G, Furuheim KM (2011) Calculation of water ingress in a HV subsea XLPE cable with a layered water barrier sheath system. J Appl Polym Sci 121(4):2127–2133. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlando Oliveira M, Horacio Reversat J, Alberto Reynoso L (2019) Wavelet transform analysis to applications in electric power systems. Wavelet Transform Complex. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han J, Crossley PA (2013) Fault location on mixed overhead line and cable transmission networks. IEEE Grenoble Conference PowerTech, POWERTECH 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2013.6652311

  16. Ngaopitakkul A, Suttisinthong N (2012) Discrete wavelet transform and probabilistic neural network algorithm for classification of fault type in underground cable. In: International conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Xi’an, China, pp 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2012.6358940

  17. Jung CK, Lee JB, Wang XH, Song YH (2007) Wavelet based noise cancellation technique for fault location on underground power cables. Electric Power Syst Res 77(10):1349–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2006.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi Q, Troeltzsch U, Kanoun O (2010). Detection and localization of cable faults by time and frequency domain measurements. In: 7th international multi-conference on systems, signals and devices. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2010.5585506

  19. Salahshoor K, Kordestani M, Khoshro MS (2010) Fault detection and diagnosis of an industrial steam turbine using fusion of SVM (support vector machine) and ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system) classifiers. Energy 35:5472–5482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abellan-Nebot JV, Subirón FR (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:237–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-009-2191-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo MF, Zeng XD, Chen DY, Yang NC (2018) Deep-learning-based earth fault detection using continuous wavelet transform and convolutional neural network in resonant grounding distribution systems. IEEE Sens J 18(3):1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2776238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng C, Zhe Z, Rui L, Cheng C, Shaokang C (2020) A CNN recognition method for early stage of 10 kV single core cable based on sheath current. Electric Power Syst Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ekici S, Yildirim S, Poyraz M (2008) Energy and entropy-based feature extraction for locating fault on transmission lines by using neural network and wavelet packet decomposition. Expert Syst Appl 34:2937–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rafinia A, Moshtagh J (2014) A new approach to fault location in three-phase underground distribution system using combination of wavelet analysis with ANN and FLS. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55:261–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng S, Zhao J (2020) A new unsupervised data mining method based on the stacked auto-encoder for chemical process fault diagnosis. Comput Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei X, Chao Q, Tao J, Liu C, Wang L (2021) Cavitation fault diagnosis method for high-speed plunger pumps based on LSTM and CNN. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronautica Sinica 42(3). https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23876

  27. Gururajapathy SS, Mokhlis H, Illias HA (2017) Fault location and detection techniques in power distribution systems with distributed generation: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:949–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raza A, Benrabah A, Alquthami T, Akmal M (2020) A review of fault diagnosing methods in power transmission systems. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gashteroodkhani OA, Majidi M, Etezadi-Amoli M, Nematollahi AF, Vahidi B (2019) A hybrid SVM-TT transform-based method for fault location in hybrid transmission lines with underground cables. Electric Power Syst Res 170:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Livani H, Evrenosoglu CY (2014) A machine learning and wavelet-based fault location method for hybrid transmission lines. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(1):51–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2260421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mishra DP, Ray P (2018) Fault detection, location and classification of a transmission line. Neural Comput Appl 30:1377–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3295-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Swaminathan R, Mishra S, Routray A, Swain SC (2021) A CNN-LSTM-based fault classifier and locator for underground cables. Neural Comput Appl 33:15293–15304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06153-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cai T, Chow MY, Lu W, Li L (2010) Statistical feature selection from massive data in distribution fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(2):642–648. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036924

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by “Woosong University’s Academic Research Funding—2023.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surender Reddy Salkuti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jena, S., Mishra, D.P., Salkuti, S.R. (2023). Fault Detection, Classification, and Location in Underground Cables. In: Salkuti, S.R., Ray, P., Singh, A.R. (eds) Power Quality in Microgrids: Issues, Challenges and Mitigation Techniques. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1039. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2066-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2066-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2065-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2066-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics