Abstract
The COVID-19 outbreak is the greatest global health catastrophe and the largest threat facing humanity ever since the Second World War. It started in the Asia region in late 2019 and since then it has spread to almost every country on the planet, causing millions of people to be sick. The deadly disease has now reached the tragic milestone of one million deaths. It has surely impacted the world in most factors, especially in the education factor. The government has introduced social-distancing protocols that affect the teaching and learning process to decrease the infection rate. To cope with the situation, schools and universities implement long-distance teaching with video conference methods. This long-distance learning and teaching with video conference methods has several impacts on undergraduate students because, they are not accustomed to learning using this method, and that some courses require direct practices in the field. Therefore, this study is to gain a conclusion if long-distance teaching with video conference methods is effective, if it brings positive effects to the students in their learning process and if it motivates to study. This study’s sampling method is submitted through Google form wherein the questionnaires are aimed at undergraduate students to obtain their outcomes about the video conference method used in their learning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdillah L (2019) Empowering digital social media in organizing computer Science Students Higher Education Assignments. In: The 4th international conference of islamic education (ICIED2019) pp 426–433
Alkaher I, Dolan E (2011) Instructors’ decisions that integrate inquiry teaching into undergraduate courses: How do I make this fit? Inter J Teach Learn 5:1–24
Andrews T, Klease G (2002) Extending learning opportunities through a virtual faculty—the video conference option. Inter J Educ Technol 3:1–11
Banathy B (1994) Designing educational systems: Creating our future in a changing world. In: Reigeluth CM, Garfinkle RJ (eds) Systemic change in education (pp 27–34). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educ Technol Publ
Bates AW (2005) Technology, e-learning and distance education. London: Routledge
Boldt S, Devine B, MacDevitt D, Morgan M (1998) Educational disadvantage and early school-leaving. Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency
Conlon T (1997) The internet is not a panacea. Scott Educ Rev 29:30–38
Dallat C, Salmon PM, Goode N (2015) All about the teacher, the rain and the backpack: The lack of a systems approach to risk assessment in school outdoor education programs. Procedia Manufact 3: 1157–1164
Freeman R, Lewis R (1998) Planning and implementing assessment. London: Kogan Page
Hannum W, Briggs L (1982) How does instructional system design differ from traditional instruction? Educ Technol 22(1):9–14
Heinich R (1993) Instructional media and technologies for learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Merril
Hunsaker PL, Hunsaker JS (2008) Virtual teams: a leader’s guide. Team Perform Manage 14(1/2):86–101
Jacobs G, Rodgers C (1997) Remote teaching with digital video: a trans-national experience, Br J Educ Technol 28(4):293–304
Jochems W, van Merriënboer J, Koper R (2004) An introduction to integrated e-Learning. In: Jochems W, vanMerriënboer J, Koper R (eds) Integrated e-Learning: Implication for pedagogy, technology and organization. London: Routledge Falmer
Kerka S (1996) Distance learning, the internet and the worldwide web. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse
Knipe D, Lee M (2002) The quality of teaching and learning via video. Br J Educ Technol 33(3):301–311
Krutka DG, Carano KT (2016) As long as I see you on Facebook I know you are safe: Social Media Experiences as Humanizing Pedagogy. In: Crowe A, Cuenca A (eds) Rethinking social studies education in the twenty-first century. (pp 207–222). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing
Larkin H (2010) “But they won’t come to lectures …”: The impact of audio recorded lectures on student experience and attendance. Australas J Educ Technol 26(2):238–249
Lawson T, Comber C, Gage J, Collum-Hanshaw A (2010) Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literatur review. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education 19(3):295–314
Lawson T, Comber C, Gage J, Cullum‐Hanshaw A (2010) Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: a literature review. Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513761. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232832362_Images_of_the_future_for_education_Videoconferencing_A_literature_review. Accessed 3 Dec 2020
Mason C, Berson M (2000) Computer mediated communication in elementary social studies methods: An examination of student’s perceptions and perspectives. Theory Res Soc Edu 28(4:527–545
Morrison FJ, Ponitz CC, McClelland MM (2010) Self-regulation and academic achievement in the transition to school. In: Calkins SD, Bell M (eds), Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp 203–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Pimmer C (2016) Mobile learning as boundary crossing: an alternative route to technology-enhanced learning? Interact Learn Environ 24:979–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1128211
Pitcher N, Davidson K, Goldfinch J (2000a) Videoconferencing in higher education. Innovations Educ Training Inter 37:199–209
Pitcher CR, Poiner IR, Hill BJ, Burridge CY (2000b) The implications of the effects of trawling on sessile megazoo-benthos on a tropical shelf in northeastern Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1359–1368
Preston G, Phillips R, Gosper M, McNeill M, Woo K, Green D (2010) Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australas J Educ Technol 26(6):717–728
Sabry K, Baldwin L (2003) Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. Br J Educ Technol 34(4):443–454
Schiller J, Mitchell J (1993) Interacting at a distance: Staff and student perceptions of teaching and learning via video conferencing. Australas J Educ Technol 9(1):41–58
Schramm W (1977) Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Skene J, Cluett L, Hogan J (2007) Engaging Gen Y students at university: What web tools do they have, how do they use them and what do they want? In: Proceedings first year in higher education conference
Sorensen C, Baylen DM (1999) Interaction in interactive television instruction: Perception or reality. In: Paper presented at the conference of the American educational research association (AERA), Montreal, Canada
Storck J, Sproull L (1995) Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Hum Commun Res 22(2):197–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00366.x
Sun X, Zhan W (2006) An exploration for influencing factors of interaction learning in web-based instruction. In: Paper presented at the 10th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, Nanjing, China
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ng, J.F., Andrew, Irawan, S.N., Gaol, F.L., Matsuo, T. (2023). The Video Conferencing Technology Implications as an Educational Method on Undergraduate Students Learning Outcomes. In: Rajakumar, G., Du, KL., Rocha, Á. (eds) Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks. ICICV 2023. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 171. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1767-9_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1767-9_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1766-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1767-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)