Skip to main content

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using J48 Decision Tree and Its Ensemble Methods for Rishikesh to Gangotri Axis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (ICDMAI 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 662))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

Implementing the various machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping has been researched by number of authors and is worth considering the issue. In the present study, the effectiveness of decision tree and its bagging and boosting-based ensemble model techniques (like random forest, extra tree, rotation forest, XGBoost, and AdaBoost) has been evaluated via generating the landslide susceptibility map (LSM). Both threshold-based, i.e., overall accuracy, and rank-based, i.e., area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC), measures have been used as the criteria for evaluating the various model’s performances. The result concluded that the XGBoost model has outperformed the other implemented algorithms after performing hyper-parameters tuning for each algorithm. The study area considered for the present study is Rishikesh to Gangotri axis with a buffer area of 3 km on each side. It is the first time that these algorithms have been implemented and compared for this study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lacasse S, Nadim F (2009) Landslide risk assessment and mitigation strategy. Landslides Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrara A, Pike RJ (2008) GIS technology and models for assessing landslide hazard and risk. Geomorphology 3(94):257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fell R et al (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh JK, Bhattacharya D (2009) Knowledge-based landslide susceptibility zonation system. J Comput Civ Eng 24(4):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(92)90053-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh S, Van Westen CJ, Carranza EJM, Ghoshal TB, Sarkar NK, Surendranath M (2009) A quantitative approach for improving the BIS (Indian) method of medium-scale landslide susceptibility. J Geol Soc India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0167-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang K, Wu X, Niu R, Yang K, Zhao L (2017) The assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and decision tree methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6731-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong H et al (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using J48 decision tree with AdaBoost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China). CATENA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dension D (1998) A Bayesian CART algorithm. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.2.363

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022643204877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salzberg S (1993) Book Review-C4.5: programs for machine learning. Mach Learn. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(62)90649-6

  12. Goel E, Abhilasha E, Goel E, Abhilasha E (2017) Random forest: a review. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez JJ, Kuncheva LI, Alonso CJ (2006) Rotation forest: a new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(10):1619–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1

  15. Schapire RE (2013) Explaining adaboost. In: Empirical inference. Springer, pp 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krishna GJ, Jaiswal H, Sai Ravi Teja P, Ravi V (2019) Keystroke based user identification with XGBoost. In: TENCON 2019–2019 IEEE region 10 conference (TENCON). IEEE, pp 1369–1374

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Saxena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saxena, V., Singh, U., Sinha, L.K. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using J48 Decision Tree and Its Ensemble Methods for Rishikesh to Gangotri Axis. In: Sharma, N., Goje, A., Chakrabarti, A., Bruckstein, A.M. (eds) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. ICDMAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 662. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1414-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics