Skip to main content

Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Drug Target Affinity Prediction in U-Shaped and Skip-Connection Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3D Imaging—Multidimensional Signal Processing and Deep Learning

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 349))

  • 301 Accesses

Abstract

It is common knowledge that traditional new medication development is a costly, drawn-out procedure with greater safety uncertainty. Among them, drug target affinity prediction (DTA) is an important step in drug discovery and drug research. If we can significantly improve the accuracy of DTA prediction, it can help us potentially reduce the cost of new drug design and development significantly. Therefore, drug target affinity prediction is a very important topic. The precise and thorough characterization of medicines and proteins is the key to this subject. With the advancement of deep learning, it has become popular for academics to integrate deep learning into DTA prediction in an effort to increase accuracy. For example, DeepDTA, WideDTA, GraphDTA, etc., which are basically trained using information of drug molecules, information of protein molecules respectively, and does not make good use of their graph relationships as well as graph deep information, and with the increase in depth of the model over the years, what should have been excellent results are hardly excellent training results because of the difficulty of training. Inspired by Unet, this paper proposes a new method, UGraphDTA, which uses a new U-shaped architecture and Skip connection architecture to enable the model to understand deeper graph information. The novelty of this method is the use of skip connections in the convolutional network, which allows the model to utilize both the original molecular graph structure information and the information after convolution of the graph, enhancing the model's prediction ability for DTA tasks. The prediction performance of UGraphDTA is empirically proven to be better than other baseline models. This indicates that our proposed U-shaped convolutional architecture for drug target affinity prediction strategy that mines the deep information of drugs and proteins is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashburn, T.T., Thor, K.B.: Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 3(8), 673–683 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parenti, M.D., Rastelli, G.: Advances and applications of binding affinity prediction methods in drug discovery. Biotechnol. Adv. 30(1), 244–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, Z.Z., Zhou, S.G., Wang, Y., et al.: Effectively identifying compound-protein interactions by learning from positive and unlabeled examples. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 15(6), 1832–1843 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pahikkala, T., et al.: Toward more realistic drug–target interaction predictions. Brief. Bioinform. 16(2), 325–337 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He, T., Heidemeyer, M., Ban, F., Cherkasov, A., Ester, M.: SimBoost: a read-across approach for predicting drug–target binding affinities using gradient boosting machines. J. Cheminformatics. 9(1), (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Öztürk, H., Özgür, A., Ozkirimli, E.: DeepDTA: deep drug–target binding affinity prediction. Bioinforamatics 34(17), i821–i829 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ă–ztĂĽrk, H., Ozkirimli, E., Ă–zgĂĽr, A.: WideDTA: prediction of drug-target binding affinity. arXiv:1902.04166 [cs, q-bio, stat], (2019)

  8. Nguyen, T., Le, H., Quinn, T. P., Nguyen, T., Le, T. D., Venkatesh, S.: GraphDTA: Predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kipf, T. N., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv:1609.02907 [cs, stat] (2017)

  10. Ghosh, S., Ghosh, S: Exploring the ideal depth of neural network when predicting question deletion on community question answering. arXiv:1912.03585 [cs], (2019). Available https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03585. Last Accessed 24 Aug 2022

  11. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv.org, (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dang, L., Nie, Y., Long, C., Zhang, Q., Li, G.: MSR-GCN: Multi-scale residual graph convolution networks for human motion prediction. arXiv:2108.07152 [cs] (2021). Available https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07152. Last Accessed 22 Aug 2022

  13. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv.org (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pahikkala, T., Airola, A., Pietil¨a, S., Shakyawar, S., Szwajda, A., Tang J., Aittokallio, T.: Briefings Bioinf. 16, 325–337 (2014). https://tdcommons.ai/multi_pred_tasks/dti/#davis. Last Accessed 22 Aug 2022

  15. The, T., Heidemeyer, M., Ban, F., Cherkasov, A., Ester, M.: Cheminf. J. 9, 24 (2017). https://tdcommons.ai/multi_pred_tasks/dti/#kiba. Last Accessed 22 Aug 2022

  16. Weininger, D.: Smiles, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 28 (1), 31–36 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Landrum, G.: RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. DeepChem.: GitHub, (2022). https://github.com/deepchem/deepchem. Accessed 24 Aug 2022

  19. Jiang, M., et al.: Drug–target affinity prediction using graph neural network and contact maps. RSC Adv. 10(35), 20701–20712 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. PconsC4: GitHub, (2022). https://github.com/ElofssonLab/PconsC4. Accessed 24 Aug. 2022

  21. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., Bengio, Y.: Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. Proceedings. mlr. press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenblatt, F.X.: Principles of neurodynamics: perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Spartan Books, Washington DC (1961)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(56), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. pytorch/pytorch.: GitHub (2021). https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiale Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, J., Dong, X., Yang, Z. (2023). Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Drug Target Affinity Prediction in U-Shaped and Skip-Connection Architectures. In: Patnaik, S., Kountchev, R., Tai, Y., Kountcheva, R. (eds) 3D Imaging—Multidimensional Signal Processing and Deep Learning. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 349. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1230-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics