Skip to main content

Improving the Quality of Agricultural Wastes for Solid Fuels Employing Torrefaction: A Case Study in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Smart Cities (ICESC2022) (ICESC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 324))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Using biomass as a fuel has some limitations, including high moisture and volatile contents, low energy density, and easily degraded. Furthermore, torrefaction can be used as a pretreatment to reduce the weakness. The process is pyrolysis at low temperatures. Therefore, the aim of this study is to improve the quality of biomass using torrefaction. Three biomass samples were used: rice husk, cocoa pod shell, and sawdust. The results showed that rice husk has the lowest bulk density, while the highest is the cocoa pod shell. Sawdust possesses the highest mass yield, while the energy yield of cocoa husk is the highest. The torrefaction reduced the moisture and volatile contents, thereby increasing the fixed carbon and heating value. The results also showed that rice husk has the highest ash content before and after torrefaction. Furthermore, the samples changed from hydrophilic to hydrophobic with reduced reactivity. Also, the raw and torrefied rice husks had the highest residue after combustion, while the lowest was found in sawdust. Finally, the cocoa pod shell had the lowest combustion temperature, while the highest was found in the torrefied sawdust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adhiguna P (2021) Indonesia’s Biomass Cofiring Bet. Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rentizelas AA, Li J (2016) Techno-economic and carbon emissions analysis of biomass torrefaction downstream in international bioenergy supply chains for co-firing. Energy 114:129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miedema JH, Benders RMJ, Moll HC, Pierie F (2017) Renew, reduce or become more efficient? the climate contribution of biomass co-combustion in a coal-fired power plant. Appl Energy 187:873–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilk M, Magdziarz A, Gajek M, Zajemska M, Jayaraman K (2017) Combustion and kinetic parameters estimation of torrefied pine, acacia and Miscanthus giganteus using experimental and modelling techniques. Bioresour Technol 243:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Barta-Rajnai E, Skreiberg Ø, Khalil R, Czégény Z, Jakab E, Grønli M (2018) Effect of torrefaction on physiochemical characteristics and grindability of stem wood, stump and bark. Appl Energy 227:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wannapeera J, Fungtammasan B, Worasuwannarak N (2011) Effects of temperature and holding time during torrefaction on the pyrolysis behaviors of woody biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 92:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thanapal SS, Annamalai K, Ansley RJ, Ranjan D (2016) Co-firing carbon dioxide-torrefied woody biomass with coal on emission characteristics. Biomass Conv Biorefinery 6:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0166-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kai X, Meng Y, Yang T, Li B, Xing W (2019) Effect of torrefaction on rice straw physicochemical characteristics and particulate matter emission behavior during combustion. Bioresour Technol 278:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nhuchhen DR, Basu P, Acharya B (2016) Torrefaction of poplar in a continuous two-stage. Indirectly Heated Rotary Torre fi er 30:1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang C, Ho S, Chen W, Xie Y, Liu Z (2018) Torrefaction performance and energy usage of biomass wastes and their correlations with torrefaction severity index. Appl Energy 220:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergman PCA, Kiel JHA (2005) Torrefaction for biomass upgrading. In: Energy research center, Netherlands, pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciolkosz D, Wallace R (2011) A review of torrefaction for bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefinery 5:317–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rousset P, Davrieux F, Macedo L, Perré P (2011) Characterisation of the torrefaction of beech wood using NIRS: combined effects of temperature and duration. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koppejan J, Sokhansanj S, Melin S, Madrali S (2012) Status overview of torrefaction technologies. The Netherlands, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tumuluru JS, Sokhansanji S, Hess JR, Wright CT, Boradman RD (2011) A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications. Ind Biotechnol 7:384–401. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2011.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan AA, de Jong W, Jansens PJ, Spliethoff H (2009) Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: Potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process Technol 90:21–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy Fuel 24:4638–4645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901168f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gucho EM, Shahzad K, Bramer EA, Akhtar NA (2015) Experimental study on dry torrefaction of beech wood. Energies 8:3903–3923. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8053903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bach Q, Skreiberg Ø (2016) Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: a review and comparison with dry torrefaction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh R, Sarkar A, Chakraborty JP (2019) Effect of torrefaction on the physicochemical properties of pigeon pea stalk (Cajanus cajan) and estimation of kinetic parameters. Renew Energy 138:805–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu P (2013) Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction (practical design and theory). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilk M, Magdziarz A, Kalemba I (2015) Characterisation of renewable fuels’ torrefaction process with different instrumental techniques. Energy 87:259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Supramono D, Devina YM, Tristantini D (2015) Effect of heating rate of torrefaction of sugarcane bagasse. Int J Technol 7:1084–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li M, Li X, Bian J, Xu J, Yang S, Sun R (2015) Influence of temperature on bamboo torrefaction under carbon dioxide atmosphere. Ind Crop Prod 76:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen D, Zheng Z, Fu K, Zeng Z, Wang J, Lu M (2015) Torrefaction of biomass stalk and its effect on the yield and quality of pyrolysis products. Fuel 159:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, Xia S, Ma P (2016) Thermogravimetric investigation of the co-combustion between the pyrolysis oil distillation residue and lignite. Bioresour Technol 218:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang X, Chen D, Ma Z, Yan J (2017) Models for the combustion of single solid fuel particles in fluidized beds: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:410–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Untoro Budi Surono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Institute of Technology PETRONAS Sdn Bhd

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Surono, U.B., Syamsiro, M., Pambudi, N.A. (2024). Improving the Quality of Agricultural Wastes for Solid Fuels Employing Torrefaction: A Case Study in Indonesia. In: Mohammed, B.S., Min, T.H., Sutanto, M.H., Joewono, T.B., As’ad, S. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Smart Cities (ICESC2022). ICESC 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 324. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1111-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1111-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1110-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1111-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics