Skip to main content

Concentration and Agglomeration in Spatial Monopoly, Spatial Duopoly, and Spatial Competition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Macroeconomics with Historical Perspectives

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 67))

  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the structure of the urban economy and urban growth under spatial monopoly, spatial duopoly, and spatial competition. We find: First, for any external utility level, the wage rate is the largest under spatial duopoly, followed by spatial monopoly and dispersed spatial competition. Second, the rent profiles depend on the maximum commuting distance under each competition scenario. For example, if the maximum commuting distance under spatial monopoly is more than twice of that under dispersed spatial competition, the order of the three scenario’s rent profiles is the same as that of the wage rate. Third, there exists a sustained point of dispersed spatial competition and a break point of concentration in the city. The conditions for both points depend on the external utility level and labor productivity in the urban space. Spatial duopoly, rather than spatial monopoly, in a centralized city leads to agglomeration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Hotelling (1929). For overviews of spatial economics, see, for example, Alonso (1964), von Thunen (1966), Christaller (1966), Muth (1969), Kanemoto (1980), Henderson (1985), Mills (1987), and Fujita (1989) on urban land use; Fujita et al. (1999) and Fujita and Thisse (2002) on new economic geography; DiPasquale and Wheaton (1996) on real estate markets; and Beckmann and Thisse (1987), Greenhut et al. (1987), and Ohta (1988) on spatial competition.

  2. 2.

    This section and Sect. 10.3.1 are mainly based on OAK (1990).

  3. 3.

    Our linear market is not only open in the sense that households are free to migrate to and from outside the market but also closed in the sense that the population size is exogenous after considering the migration to and from that market. Definitions of open and closed as well as small cities were introduced by Wheaton (1974).

References

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann MJ, Thisse J-F (1987) The location of production activities. In: Nijkamp P (ed) Handbook of regional and urban economics: regional economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner M, Ohta H (1990) Japanese economic growth and the Takuboku lament. Taiwan Econ Rev 17:435–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller W (1966) The central places in southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot A (1897) Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth (translated by N. T. Bacon). Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPasquale D, Wheaton WC (1996) Urban economics and real estate markets. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M (1989) Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J-F (1986) Spatial competition with a land market: Hotelling and von Thunen unified. Rev Econ Stud 53(5):819–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut ML, Norman G, Hung CS (1987) The economics of imperfect competition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronberg TJ, Meyer J (1982) Spatial pricing, spatial rents and spatial welfare. Q J Econ 97(4):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson UJ (1985) Economic theory and the cities, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanemoto Y (1980) Theories of urban externalities. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhase JE, Ohta H (1990) Löschian spatial competition and the related labor market. Environ Plan A 17(2):1223–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (1991a) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman PR (1991b) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lösch A (1954) The economics of location (translated by W.H. Woglom and W.F. Stolper). Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills ES (ed) (1987) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth RF (1969) Cities and housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagome M (1986) The spatial labor market and spatial competition. Reg Stud 20(4):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta H (1988) Spatial Price theory of imperfect competition. Texas A&M University Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta H, Asami Y, Kohlhase J (1990) Land, labour and product markets under spatial monopoly and spatial competition. In: Chatterji M, Kuenne R (eds) New frontiers in regional science essays in honor of Walter Isard, vol 1. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano GIP, Puga D (1997) Agglomeration in the global economy: a survey of the “new economic geography”. World Econ 21(6):707–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Thunen JH (1966) Von Thunen’s isolated state (translated by C. M. Wartenberg and edited by P. Hall). Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton W (1974) A comparative static analysis of urban spatial structure. J Econ Theory 9:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wako T (1992) Effects of alternative types of competitive location on rent profiles and aggregate rent. Stud Reg Sci 22(1):243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professors Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara, Kei Hosoya, and Tsuyoshi Shinozaki for comments on and critiques of earlier versions of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuetsu Takahashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wako, T., Takahashi, S. (2023). Concentration and Agglomeration in Spatial Monopoly, Spatial Duopoly, and Spatial Competition. In: Takahashi, S., Yanagihara, M., Hosoya, K., Shinozaki, T. (eds) Modern Macroeconomics with Historical Perspectives. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 67. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1067-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics