Skip to main content

Influence of Vertical Seismic Coefficient in Seismic Analysis of Hydro-Tunnel in Rock

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering ((SPRTRCIENG))

  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of increased urbanization and the need for better infrastructure, the scope of tunnel projects is also expanding. The country has much potential for hydropower, and the hydropower sector has produced the most tunnels. Hydro projects have some of the country's longest tunnels. In the Himalayan areas, almost 75% of the full potential for hydropower production is concentrated. Himachal Pradesh has the most projects with a total tunnel length of 500 km, followed by Uttarakhand (160.8 km) and Jammu and Kashmir (135.14). Due to geographical and geological difficulties, tunneling in the Himalayan area is extremely difficult. Due to geological issues such as sheared rock, high water intrusion, and high geothermal gradient, long hydro-tunnels have experienced time and expense overruns. Extensive studies must be conducted to use the hydropower potential fully, the appropriate technique must be adopted, and risks must be adequately identified and managed. Geological prediction during tunneling should be standard practice to reduce geological uncertainty and prevent unanticipated hazards. To complete a project on schedule and safely accurate evolution, analysis, and interpretation of rock mass quality play a key role. This paper provides a numerical analysis of the seismic response of a circular lined tunnel running through a jointed rock mass. The effect of tunnel depth, frequency, and peak ground acceleration on the axial force produced in the tunnel liner is studied. The outcomes of the numerical computation have verified the patterns of seismic damage observed in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goel RK (2001) Status of tunnelling and underground construction activities and technologies in India. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(2):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panthi KK (2012) Evaluation of rock bursting phenomena in a tunnel in the Himalayas. Bull Eng Geol Env 71(4):761–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun QQ, Dias D (2019) Assessment of stress relief during excavation on the seismic tunnel response by the pseudo-static method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zou Y, et al (2017) A pseudo-static method for seismic responses of underground frame structures subjected to increasing excitations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 65: 106–120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JI-C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(4):247–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Putti SP, Devarakonda NS (2018) Ground response analysis and liquefaction hazard assessment for Vishakhapatnam city. Innov Infrastruct Solutions 3(1): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Putti SP, Devarakonda NS (2020) Evaluation of site effects using HVSR microtremor measurements in Vishakhapatnam (India). Earth Syst Environ 4: 439–454

    Google Scholar 

  8. Putti SP, Devarakonda NS, Towhata I (2019) Estimation of ground response and local site effects for Vishakhapatnam, India. Nat Hazards 97(2): 555–578

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rao KS, Devarakonda NS (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 646–654

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srivastav A, Satyam N (2020) Understanding the impact of the earthquake on circular tunnels in different rock mass: a numerical approach. Innov Infrastruc Solutions 5(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bilotta E, Lanzano G, Russo G, Santucci de Magistris F, Aiello V, Conte E, Silvestri F, Valentino M (2007) Pseudostatic and dynamic analyses of tunnels in transversal and longitudinal direction. In: Proceeding of the fourth international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece; Paper no. 1550

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, T-H, et al (2016) Damage analysis of cut-and-cover tunnel structures under seismic loading. Bull Earthq Eng 14(2): 413–431

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sivarajan TK (2016) Seismic load considerations in the design of underground structures for hydropower projects in the Himalayan region. In: Recent advances in rock engineering (RARE 2016). Atlantis Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tshering T (2011) The impact of earthquakes on tunnels in different rock mass quality Q. Master’s Thesis in Geosciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thakur VC, Sriram V, Mundepi AK (2000) Seismotectonics of the great 1905 Kangra earthquake meizoseismal region in Kangra-Chamba, NW Himalaya. Tectonophysics 326(3–4):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Richards A, Argles T, Harris N et al (2005) Himalayan architecture constrained by isotopic tracers from clastic sediments. Earth Plan Sci Lett 236: 773–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.034

  17. Goel RK (2014) Tunnel boring machine in the Himalayan tunnels 54–67

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISRM (1981) Rock characterization testing and monitoring, ISRM suggested method. Int Soc Rock Mech 211

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lakshmanan K (2016) Geotechnical investigations of Vishnugarh Pipalkoti HYDEL project, Garhwal, India. PhD Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rocscience Inc (2011) Phase2 program reference manual

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paraskevopoulou C, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2012) Long term tunnel behaviour and support response analysis using 2D numerical modelling methods. In: 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association

    Google Scholar 

  22. IS 456 (2000) Plain and reinforced concrete—code of practice [CED 2: Cement and Concrete]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geng P, Mei S, Zhang J et al (2019) Study on seismic performance of shield tunnels under combined effect of axial force and bending moment in the longitudinal direction. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 91:103004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ambika Srivastav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Indian Society of Earthquake Technology

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srivastav, A., Satyam, N. (2023). Influence of Vertical Seismic Coefficient in Seismic Analysis of Hydro-Tunnel in Rock. In: Jakka, R.S., Singh, Y., Sitharam, T.G., Maheshwari, B.K. (eds) Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation . Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0081-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0081-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0080-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0081-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics