Abstract
Access to social housing is becoming more selective with allocation criteria requiring applicants’ stronger financial capacity or, conversely, proving their state of extreme vulnerability. This seeming contradiction results from two contrasting trends in social housing governance and management: a push toward adopting quasi-market privately funded models, on the one hand, and ongoing residualization processes on the other hand. Such polarization of social housing supply increases pre-existing divisions between insiders and outsiders. Young people are increasingly seen as outsiders in housing markets, a condition that exacerbates the risk of social exclusion and undermines the transition to adulthood. However, in the wake of changing approaches to the provision and management of social and affordable housing, new tenures are being used to improve access for young people while promoting greater involvement in community-oriented actions. Such tenures rely on a specific understanding of conditionality whereby units are allocated at below-market rates to young people in return for their commitment to engage in solidarity activities and help tasks for vulnerable neighbors. This chapter discusses this idea of conditionality and its effects on young people’s relationships within local communities. It shows that such relationships are shaped by complex, dynamic, and strongly context-dependent assemblages of individual human capital (e.g., capabilities, pro-social motivations, and attitudes), available spatial resources and conditions, and the fundamental direction and discretion of housing managers and practitioners. This conceptualization of conditionality discloses aims of tenant responsibilization toward both individual dwelling and community, redefining young people’s identities as resourceful tenants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, A. (2017). Les effets socio-spatiaux d’un dispositif résidentiel d’incitation à la mixité sociale. L’exemple de la résidence «kolocations à projets solidaires» de la Cité à Oullins (Rhône). Géocarrefour, 91/4. https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.10350
Angel, S. (2021). Housing regimes and residualization of the subsidized rental sector in Europe 2005–2016. Housing Studies, Online first, 38, 881. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1921122
Arroyo, I., Montesino, N., Johansson, E., & Yahia, M. W. (2021). Social integration through social connection in everyday life. Residents’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in SällBo collaborative housing, Sweden. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0236
Blessing, A. (2016). Repackaging the poor? Conceptualising neoliberal reforms of social rental housing. Housing Studies, 31(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1070799
Boelhouwer, P. (1999). International comparison of social housing Management in Western Europe. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496679
Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2013). Introduction special issue: Mixing neighbourhoods: Success or failure? Cities, 35, 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.006
Chevin, D. (2013). Social hearted, commercially minded: A report on Tomorrow’s housing associations. The Smith Institute.
Clark, W. A. V. (2019). Millennials in the housing market: The transition to ownership in challenging contexts. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(2), 206–227.
Clarke, A., Watts, B., & Parsell, C. (2020). Conditionality in the context of housing-led homelessness policy: Comparing Australia’s housing first agenda to Scotland’s “rights-based” approach. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 55, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.97
Costarelli, I., & Melic, T. (2022). Housing motivated youth in low-income neighborhoods: How practitioners shape conditions for youth encounters across diversity in ‘intentional’ social mix programs in Milan and Paris. Journal of Urban Affairs, 44(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1977139
Costarelli, I., Kleinhans, R., & Mugnano, S. (2019). Reframing social mix in affordable housing initiatives in Italy and in The Netherlands. Closing the gap between discourses and practices? Cities, 90, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.033
Costarelli, I., Kleinhans, R., & Mugnano, S. (2020). ‘Thou shalt be a (more) responsible tenant’: Exploring innovative management strategies in changing social housing contexts. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09680-0
Costarelli, I., Kleinhans, R., & Mugnano, S. (2021). ‘Active, young, and resourceful’: Sorting the ‘good’ tenant through mechanisms of conditionality. Housing Studies, 36(8), 1250–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1759789
Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing and housing providers: Towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593
Czischke, D., & Huisman, C. (2018). Integration through collaborative housing? Dutch starters and refugees forming self-managing communities in Amsterdam. Urban Planning, 3(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1727
Deacon, A. (2004). Justifying conditionality: The case of anti-social tenants. Housing Studies, 19(6), 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000293008
Driant, J. C., Lelévrier, C., & Zetlaoui-Leger, J. (2013). Promotion des logements solidaires (“Kaps”). Rapport de recherche Ministère des Sports, de la Jeunesse, de l’Education populaire et de la Vie associative, Direction de la Jeunesse, de l’Education populaire et de la Vie associative. hal-01921646.
Druta, O., & Ronald, R. (2017). Young adults’ pathways into homeownership and the negotiation of intra-family support: A home, the ideal gift. Sociology, 51(4), 783–799.
Dwyer, P. (2004). Creeping conditionality in the UK : From welfare rights to conditional entitlements? The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/3654696
Flint, J. (2004). The responsible tenant: Housing governance and the politics of behaviour. Housing Studies, 19(6), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000293991
Flint, J. (2019). Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes. Urban Studies, 56(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209801775007
Flint, J., & Nixon, J. (2006). Governing neighbours: Anti-social behaviour orders and new forms of regulating conduct in the UK. Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676
Fondation Abbé Pierre and FEANTSA. (2021). Sixth overview of housing exclusion in Europe, Brussels, Paris.
Forrest, R., & Yip, N.-M. (Eds.). (2012). Young people and housing: Transitions, trajectories, and generational fractures. Routledge.
Grander, M. (2017). New public housing: A selective model disguised as universal? Implications of the market adaptation of Swedish public housing. International Journal of Housing Policy, 17(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2016.1265266
Haworth, A., & Manzi, T. (1999). Managing the “underclass”: Interpreting the moral discourse of housing management. Urban Studies, 36(1), 153–165.
Hoolachan, J., McKee, K., Moore, T., & Soaita, A. M. (2017). ‘Generation rent’ and the ability to ‘settle down’. Economic and geographical variation in young people’s housing transitions. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(1), 63–78.
Humphry, D. (2020). From residualisation to individualization? Social tenants’ experiences in post Olympics East Village. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(4), 458–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1633400
Hunter, C. (2001). Anti-social behaviour and housing – Can law be the answer? In D. Cowan & A. Marsh (Eds.), Two steps forward: Housing policy into the new millennium (pp. 221–237). Policy Press.
Johnsen, S., Fitzpatrick, S., & Watts, B. (2018). Homelessness and social control: A typology. Housing Studies, 33(7), 1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1421912
Lennartz, C., Arundel, R., & Ronald, R. (2016). Younger adults and homeownership in Europe through the global financial crisis. Population, Space and Place, 22(8), 823–835.
Mackie, P. K. (2016). Young people and housing: Identifying the key issues. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1159273
Mahieu, R., & Van Caudenberg, R. (2020). Young refugees and locals living under the same roof: Intercultural communal living as a catalyst for refugees’ integration in European urban communities?. Comparative. Migration Studies, 8(12), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0168-9
Manzi, T. (2010). Promoting responsibility, shaping behaviour: Housing management, mixed communities and the construction of citizenship. Housing Studies, 25(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903363462
Mullins, D., Czischke, D., & van Bortel, G. (2012). Exploring the meaning of hybridity and social enterprise in housing organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.689171
Mullins, D., Milligan, V., & Nieboer, N. (2018). State directed hybridity? – The relationship between non-profit housing organizations and the state in three national contexts. Housing Studies, 33(4), 565–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1373747
Nethercote, M. (2017). Neoliberal welfare, minorities and tenancy support. Social Policy and Society, 6(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000548
Oliver, C., Geuijen, K., & Dekker, R. (2020). Social contact and encounter in asylum seeker reception: The Utrecht refugee Launchpad. Comparative. Migration Studies, 8(27), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00187-0
Parsell, C., Vincent, E., Klein, E., Clarke, A., & Walsh, T. (2020). Introduction: Special issue, welfare conditionality in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 55, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.102
Preece, J., Hickman, P., & Pattison, B. (2019). The affordability of “affordable” housing in England: Conditionality and exclusion in a context of welfare reform. Housing Studies, 35(7), 1214–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1653448
Stewart, A. B. R. (2018). Housing rites: Young people’s experience of conditional pathways out of homelessness. Housing Studies, 34(7), 1117–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1520818
Stonehouse, D., Threlkeld, G., & Farmer, J. (2015). Housing risk’ and the neoliberal discourse of responsibilisation in Victoria. Critical Social Policy, 35(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315588232
Taylor, D. R., Gray, M., & Stanton, D. (2016). New conditionality in Australian social security policy. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2016.tb00362.x
Van Daalen, G., & Van Der Land, M. (2008). Next steps in choice-based letting in the Dutch social housing sector. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710802256728
Walker, R. (2000). The changing management of social housing: The impact of externalisation and managerialisation. Housing Studies, 15(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030082397
Watts, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2018). Welfare conditionality. Routledge.
Wilkinson, E., & Ortega-Alcázar, I. (2019). Stranger danger? The intersectional impacts of shared housing on young people’s health & wellbeing. Health and Place, 60(August), 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102191
Yu, H. C., Lin, T. H., & Dąbrowski, M. (2022). Beyond conditionality: Community Placemaking in Taiwanese social housing management. Planning Practice & Research., 38, 43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2022.2079804
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Costarelli, I. (2023). Social Housing and Young People: Effect of Emerging Forms of Conditionality on Young People’s Relationships Within Local Communities. In: Wyn, J., Cahill, H., Cuervo, H. (eds) Handbook of Children and Youth Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-96-3_105-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-96-3_105-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-96-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-96-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences