Abstract
Prevailing studies consider the design of reinforced concrete moment resisting frame having fixed base. When a structure is subjected to earthquake, foundation undergoes three modes of deformation, namely vertical, sliding and rocking. These deformations increase the force demand due to uncertainties in the characterization of soil. In the present study, a numerical modelling is carried out using the finite element software OpenSees to evaluate the seismic response of a typical eight-storey four-bay vertical geometric irregular building considering soil–structure interaction and the results are compared with a reference regular building. The numerical modelling is carried out considering the footings as beams on nonlinear Winkler foundation in which footing is modelled as elastic elements and the soil is modelled as discrete nonlinear springs in both vertical and horizontal directions. Fibre-based nonlinear element is used for modelling the reinforced concrete beams and columns. A suite of five earthquake ground motion records of different magnitudes is considered for the dynamic analyses. Four types of soil–structure interactions are considered: fixed regular, fixed VGI, flexible regular and flexible VGI. The effect of soil–structure interaction on the seismic response of framed building is demonstrated in terms of probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility curves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harden, C. W.: Numerical Modeling of the Nonlinear Cyclic Response of Shallow Foundations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2005)
Raychowdhury, P.: Nonlinear winkler-based shallow foundation model for performance asessment of seismically loaded structures (Doctoral dissertation, UC San Diego) (2008).
Gajan, S., Hutchinson, T.C., Kutter, B.L., Raychowdhury, P., Ugalde, J.A., Stewart, J.P.: Numerical Models for Analysis and Performance-Based Design of Shallow Foundations Subjected to Seismic Loading. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2008).
Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D., Pitilakis, K.D.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 73, 42–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.016
Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B., Samali, B.: Physical modeling of seismic soil-pile-structure interaction for buildings on soft soils. Int. J. Geomech. 15(2), 04014046 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000396
Van Nguyen, Q., Fatahi, B., Hokmabadi, A.S.: Influence of size and load-bearing mechanism of piles on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–pile–structure interaction. Int. J. Geomech. 17(7), 04017007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869
Behnamfar, F., Mirhosseini, S.M., Alibabaei, H.: Seismic behavior of structures considering uplift and soil–structure interaction. Adv. Struct. Eng. 20(11), 1712–1726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217693628
Jabini A.S., Saffari, H., Zahedi, M.J., Saadatinezhad, M.: Comparing the performance of substructure and direct methods to estimate the effect of SSI on seismic response of mid-rise structures. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1597560
Stewart, J., Crouse, C.B., Hutchinson, T.C., Lizundia, B., Naeim, F., Ostadan, F.: Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures, NIST (No. Grant/Contract Reports (NISTGCR)-12-917-21) (2012).
Anand, V., Kumar, S.S.: Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review. In Structures. Elsevier (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009
Priyadarshini, M.: Seismic risk assessment of RC framed vertically irregular buildings. M. Tech. Dissertation, Department of Civil engineering, NIT Rourkela (2013).
Pragalath, D.H.: Reliability based seismic design of open ground storey framed buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Rourkela (2015).
Bhosale, A.: Studies on vertically irregular RC infilled frame buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Rourkela (2018).
McKenna, F., McGann, C., Arduino, P., Harmon, J.A.: OpenSees Laboratory (2014). https://nees.org/resources/openseeslab, last accessed 2019/06/19.
Kent, D.C., Park, R.: Flexural members with confined concrete. J. Struct. Div. (1971).
Menegotto, M., Pinto, P.: Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proceedings. IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads (1973).
IS 1893: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. 5th revision, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (2016).
Gazetas, G.: Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. J. Geotech. Eng. 117(9), 1363–1381 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1363)
Meyerhof, G.G.: Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Can. Geotech. J. 1(1), 16–26 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1139/t63-003
Rankine, W.M.: On the mathematical theory of the stability of earthwork and masonry. J. Franklin Inst. 63(2), 84–85 (1857)
Haselton, C.B., Whittaker, A.S., Hortacsu, A., Baker, J.W., Bray, J., Grant, D.N.: Selecting and scaling earthquake ground motions for performing response-history analyses. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 4207–4217. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (2012).
Mukherjee, S., Gupta, V.K.: Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 22(9–12), 799–804 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00101-X
Newmark, N.M.: A method of computation for structural dynamics. J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 85. No EM3 (1959).
Plaxis, B.V.: Plaxis 2D Version 8 Manual. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2002)
Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O., Foutch, D.A.: Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J. Struct. Eng. 128(4), 526–533 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
Shome, N., Cornell, C.A.: Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Rep. No.: RMS-35, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Patro, S.R., Sasmal, S.K., Suneel Kumar, G., Sarkar, P., Behera, R.N. (2021). Seismic Analysis of Vertical Geometric Irregular Building Considering Soil–Structure Interaction. In: Patel, S., Solanki, C.H., Reddy, K.R., Shukla, S.K. (eds) Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 138. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6564-3_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6564-3_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6563-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6564-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)