Skip to main content

Horizontal Dynamic Resource Scaling by Measuring the Impacts of Scheduling Interval in Cloud Computing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 192))

  • 394 Accesses

Abstract

Cloud servers or Host machines are having a sufficient number of computing resources, and these resources will be shared among its client applications as per the requirement. The traffic on the cloud servers or Host machines is unpredictable, and the demand may increase or decrease with a great variations many times. Even there are lots of reasons of such variations in traffic, here we are not going to discuss such reasons. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the meetings, teaching–learning, documents exchanging, etc. are performed using online applications. It is noticed that the both data and processing load are increased in multiple times during the last six months on the social networking sites, and clients faced the problem of low connectivity and slow processing of applications. These cases show that there is very great requirement of load balancing of computing resources on cloud servers to maintain the smooth processing of tasks. In this paper, our main focus is to measure the impacts of scheduling interval on dynamic resource allocation and to calculate the demand of resources dynamically on the basis of dynamic creation or deletion of virtual machines to serve the cloudlet load efficiently. Dynamic resource scaling can be done either horizontally or vertically. In horizontal dynamic resource scaling, the Host machines are equipped with the more number of resources rather than increasing the number of Host machines. In cloud computing, the service provider’s intention is to provide a cost-effective and efficient service support to its clients. The resources and services in cloud computing are on the pay-per-use basis, and hence, the horizontal dynamic resource scaling provides a good cost-effective solution for the resource requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang S, Qian ZZ, Wu J et al (2015) Service-oriented resource allocation in clouds: pursuing flexibility and efficiency. J Comput Sci Technol 30(2):421–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastasi GF, Coppola M, Dazzi P, Distefano M (2016) QoS Guarantees for network bandwidth in private clouds. In: CLOUD FORWARD: from distributed to complete computing, CF2016, 18–20 October 2016. Madrid, Spain, Proc Comput Sci 97:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barba-Jimenez C, Ramirez-Velarde R, Tchernykh A, Rodríguez-Dagnino R, Nolazco-Flores J, Perez-Cazares R (2016) Cloud based video-on-demand service model ensuring quality of service and scalability. J Netw Comput Appl

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sareen P, Kumar P, Singh TP Resource allocation strategies in cloud computing. Int J Comput Sci Commun Netw 5(6):358–365

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rajasekar B, Manigandan SK (2015) An efficient resource allocation strategies in cloud computing. Int J Innov Res Comput Commun Eng 3(2):1239–1244

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alnori A, Djemame K (2018) A holistic resource management for graphics processing units in cloud computing. Electron Notes Theoret Comput Sci 340:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gmach D, Rolia J, Cherkasova L, Kemper A (2007) Capacity management and demand prediction for next generation data Centers. In: Published in the international conference on web services (ICWS ‘2007), 9–13 July 2007. Salt Lake City, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lim H, Babu S, Chase J Automated control for elastic storage. In: Proceedings ICAC ’10, June 7–11, 2010. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Urgaonkar B, Pacifici MSG, Shenoy PJ, Tantawi AN (2005) An analytical model for multi-tier internet services and its applications. In: Proceedings SIGMETRICS, June 6–10, 2005. Banff, Alberta, Canada, ACM 1-59593-022-1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Toosi AN, Son J, Chi Q, Buyya R (2019) ElasticSFC: auto-scaling techniques for elastic service function chaining in network functions virtualization-based clouds. J Syst Softw

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baruah P, Mohanpurkar A (2015) Impact of elasticity on cloud systems. Int J Comput Appl (0975–8887) 120(14):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghose S (2016) Testing elasticity of cloud platform. Int J Comput Eng Appl X(VI):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rehman Z, Hussain OK, Hussain FK, Chang E, Dillon T (2015) User-side QoS forecasting and management of cloud services. Received: 26 August 2014/Revised: 26 November 2014, Springer Science Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh J, Agarwal S, Mishra J (2015) A review: towards quality of service in cloud computing. Int J Sci Res (IJSR), 555–561. ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value, 78.96|Impact Factor 6.391

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghahramani MH, Zhou MC, Hon CT (2017) Toward cloud computing QoS architecture: analysis of cloud systems and cloud services. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sinica 4(1):6–18

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rahamath Nazneen S, Kavitha R (2014) Cloud computing integrated with testing to ensure quality. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Technol (IJARCST 2014), IJARCST 2(1):196–199. ISSN: 2347-8446 (Online), ISSN: 2347-9817 (Print)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kivity A, Kamay Y, Laor D, Lublin U, Liguori A (2007) kvm: the Linux virtual machine monitor. In: Proceedings of the Ottawa Linux symposium, vol 1, pp 225–230

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choi J, Ahn Y, Kim S, Kim Y, Choi J (2015) VM auto-scaling methods for high throughput computing on hybrid infrastructure. Clust Comput 18:1063–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar Chaturvedi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chaturvedi, A.K., Sengar, P., Sharma, K. (2021). Horizontal Dynamic Resource Scaling by Measuring the Impacts of Scheduling Interval in Cloud Computing. In: Goyal, V., Gupta, M., Trivedi, A., Kolhe, M.L. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 192. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6546-9_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6546-9_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6545-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6546-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics