Abstract
Risk assessment and decision-making problems in engineering applications attract researchers as the loss incurred due to accidents in these areas is massive. It becomes difficult to quantify the loss when human life is at risk. This invited more detailed studies and attempts to provide reliable and workable risk control options. Evaluation and assessment of risk are difficult because of complex structure and high amount of uncertainty in complex engineering environment. Plithogenic sets have gained popularity in recent years which can capture this uncertainty with ease. To use plithogenic sets in combination with evidential reasoning for decision-making, we need to design a method to suitably convert plithogenic numbers into their corresponding basic belief assignments. This paper proposes a novel method to convert any of the plithogenic number to its corresponding basic belief assignments. A decision-making model using Dempster–Shafer evidential reasoning in plithogenic environment is then developed for assessing risk and ranking of the criteria in a complex system. An example of a typical system on board ship is given to illustrate the proposed model and its application in maritime transportation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berner C, Flage R (2016) Strengthening quantitative risk assessments by systematic treatment of uncertain assumptions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 151:46–59
Zadeh LA (1975) Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. Academic Press, Macon, GA
Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Set Syst 1(1):3–28
Grattan-Guinness I (1976) Fuzzy membership mapped onto interval and many-valued quantities. Z Math Logik Grundladen Math 22:149–160
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20(1):87–96
Atanassov KT, Gargov G (1989) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 31(3):343–349
Wu J, Huang H, Cao QW (2013) Research on AHP with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in multi-criteria decision making problems. Appl Math 37:9898–9906
Ju Y, Wang A (2013) Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information. Appl Math 37:3112–3125
Vahdani B, Mousavi SM, Moghaddam RT, Hashemi H (2013) A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Math 37:1781–1799
Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. In: Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth
Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2005) Interval valued neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computing. Hexis, Phoenix, AZ
Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistructure 4:410–413
Broumi S, Smarandache F (2015) Single valued neutrosophic soft expert sets and their application in decision making. J New Theory 3:67–88
Ye J (2014) Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multicriteria decision making problems. Appl Math 38:1170–1175
Chakraborty A, Banik B, Mondal SP, Alam S (2020) Arithmetic and geometric operators of pentagonal neutrospohic number and its application in mobile communication service based MCGDM problem. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 32:61–79
Edalatpanah SA (2020) A direct model for triangular neutrosophic linear programming. Int J Neutrosophic Sci 1(1):19–28
Pal S, Chakraborty A (2020) Triangular neutrosophic-based EOQ model for non-instantaneous deteriorating item under shortages. Am J Bus Oper Res 1(1):28–35
Chakraborty A, Broumi S, Singh PK (2019) Some properties of pentagonal neutrosophic numbers and its applications in transportation problem environment. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 28:200–215
Tahan MAA (2020) Some results on single valued neutrosophic (weak polygroups). Int J Neutrosophic Sci 2(1):38–46
Smarandache F (2018) Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets—revisited. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 21:153–166
Smarandache F (2017) Plithogeny, plithogenic set, logic, probability and statistics. Pons Publishing House, Brussels, Belgium, p 141
Basset MA, Mohamed R (2020) A novel plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. J Clean Prod 247:119586
Basset MA, El-hoseny M, Gamal A, Smarandache F (2019) A novel model for evaluation Hospital medical care systems based on plithogenic sets. Artif Intell Med 100:101710
Basset MA, Mohamed R, Zaied AEH, Smarandache F (2019) A hybrid plithogenic decision-making approach with quality function deployment for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. Symmetry 11:903. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11070903
Sotiralis P, Venticos NP, Hamann R, Golyshev P, Teixeira AP (2016) Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focussing on human centred design aspects. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 156:210–227
Hanninen M (2014) Bayesian networks for maritime traffic accident prevention: benefits and challenges. Accid Anal Prev 73:305–312
Soares CG, Teixeira AP (2001) Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74:299–309
Christian R, Kang HG (2017) Probabilistic risk assessment on maritime spent nuclear fuel transportation-part I: transport cask damage probability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 164:124–135
Christian R, Kang HG (2017) Probabilistic risk assessment on maritime spent nuclear fuel transportation (part II: ship collision probability). Reliab Eng Syst Saf 164:136–149
Yang ZL, Wang J, Bonsall S, Fang QG (2009) Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Anal 29:95–120
Ye X, Chen B, Lee K, Storesund R, Zhang B (2020) An integrated offshore oil spill response decision making approach by human factor analysis and fuzzy preference evaluation. Environ Pollut 262:114294
Ahmed S, Gu XC (2020) Accident-based FMECA study of marine boiler for risk prioritization using fuzzy expert system. Results Eng 6:100123
Liu J, Yang JB, Wang J, Sii HS, Wang YM (2004) Fuzzy rule based evidential reasoning approach for safety analysis. Int J Gen Syst 33(2–3):183–204
Guo M, Yang JB, Chin KS, Wang H (2007) Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 182:1294–1312
Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38:325–339
Jousselme AL, Liu C, Grenier D, Bosse E (2006) Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Humans 36(5):890–903
Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42:386–394
Ziang W (2017) A correlation coefficient of belief functions. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05497. Last accessed 2017/02/02
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pai, S.P., Prabhu Gaonkar, R.S. (2021). Risk Assessment Using Evidential Reasoning in Plithogenic Environment. In: Acharya, S.K., Mishra, D.P. (eds) Current Advances in Mechanical Engineering . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4795-3_88
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4795-3_88
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4794-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4795-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)