Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potential Refrigerants and Their Effect on the Environment—A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Current Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Refrigerants are fluids that are used for heat transfer applications. The development of several man-made refrigerants and their higher thermal efficiency led to the popularity and increase in the use of man-made refrigerants to achieve better performance. But, the use of synthetic refrigerants affects the environment by causing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. HFCs are being used currently as an alternative for CFCs but are expected to be phased out by the year 2030 due to their high global warming potential. Natural refrigerants are eco-friendly and are currently gaining momentum for several applications. This paper presents an overview of different potential refrigerants that can be used for different applications. The choice of refrigerant depends on the suitability of refrigerant for a particular refrigeration system. The adverse environmental effects have compelled the researchers to choose refrigerants with the key consideration of the greenhouse effect and ozone depletion potential of the refrigerants. With a detailed discussion about natural refrigerants, along with their environmental impacts and performance in comparison with other popular HCFC and CFC refrigerants, it is revealed that natural refrigerants are the most appropriate to replace the synthetic refrigerants in various field of refrigeration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Riffat SB, Afonso CF, Oliveira AC, Reay DA (1997) Natural refrigerants for refrigeration and air-conditioning systems. Appl Therm Eng 17:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Calm JM (2008) The next generation of refrigerants—historical review, considerations, and outlook. Int J Refrig 31:1123–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abas N, Kalair AR, Khan N, Haider A, Saleem Z, Saleem MS (2018) Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatti MSA (1999) Historical look at chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. ASHRAE Trans Part 1:1186–1206

    Google Scholar 

  5. UNEP (2000) United Nation environment program. In: Handbook for International treaties for protection of the ozone layers, 5th edn. Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang Y, Ohadi M, Radermacher R (1998) Natural refrigerants. Mechanical Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), vol 120, pp 96–99

    Google Scholar 

  7. IPCC (2007) Projections of future changes in climate—AR4 WGI summary for policymakers 2007. IPCC Fourth Assess Rep Clim Chang n.d. https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-projections-of.html. Accessed 7 June 2017

  8. Bolaji BO, Huan Z (2013) Ozone depletion and global warming: case for the use of natural refrigerant—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinsell RC, Noe JC, Byrne JP (1977) Air cycle air conditioning system for vehicles. US Patent 4015438

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spence SWT, Doran WJ, Artt DW, McCullough G (2005) Performance analysis of a feasible air-cycle refrigeration system for road transport. Int J Refrig 28:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller JP, Smith CD, Allam RJ, Topham AKJ (1996) Refrigeration system. U.S. Patent 5,483,806

    Google Scholar 

  12. Park SK, Ahn JH, Kim TS (2012) Off-design operating characteristics of an open-cycle air refrigeration system. Int J Refrig 35:2311–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Q, Piechna J, Müller N (2011) Thermodynamic potential of using a counter rotating novel axial impeller to compress water vapor as refrigerant. Int J Refrig 34:1286–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang RZ, Li Y (2007) Perspectives for natural working fluids in China. Int J Refrig 30:568–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lachner BF, Nellis GF, Reindl DT (2007) The commercial feasibility of the use of water vapor as a refrigerant. Int J Refrig 30:699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorentzen G, Pettersen J, Bang RR (1993) Method and device for high-side pressure regulation in transcritical vapor compression cycle. U.S. Patent 5,245,836

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson D, Groll E (1996) Using carbon dioxide in a transcriticalvapour compression refrigeration cycle. In: Proceedings of the sixth international refrigeration conference. Purdue University, pp 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SG, Kim MS (2002) Experiment and simulation on the performance of auto- cascade refrigeration system using carbon-dioxide as a refrigerant. Int J Refrig 25:1093–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson A (2008) Refrigeration with ammonia. Int J Refrig 31:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palm B (2008) Ammonia in low capacity refrigeration and heat pump systems. Int J Refrig 31:709–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Didion D, Brown JS (2000) Challenges in developing environmentally safe heat pumping systems. In: Proceedings of the ASME-ZSITS international thermal science seminar, Bled

    Google Scholar 

  22. Granryd E (2001) Hydrocarbons as refrigerants—an overview. Int J Refrig 24:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Halimic E, Ross D, Agnew B, Anderson A, Potts I (2003) A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants. Appl Therm Eng 23:1441–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saleh B, Wendland M (2006) Screening of pure fluids as alternative refrigerants. Int J Refrig 29:260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Palm B (2008) Hydrocarbons as refrigerants in small heat pump and refrigeration systems—a review. Int J Refrig 31:552–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorentzen G (1994) Revival of carbon dioxide as a refrigerant. Int J Refrig 17:292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jarahnejad M (2012) New Low GWP Synthetic Refrigerants. KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohanraj M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C (2009) Environment friendly alternatives to halogenated refrigerants—a review. Int J Greenh Gas Control 3:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mota-Babiloni A, Navarro- J, Molés F, Cervera ÁB, Peris B, Verdú G (2016) A review of refrigerant R1234ze (E) recent investigations. Appl Therm Eng 95:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mota-Babiloni A, Makhnatch P, Khodabandeh R (2017) Recent investigations in HFCs substitution with lower GWP synthetic alternatives: focus on energetic performance and environmental impact. Int J Refrig 82:288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Doring R, Buchwald H, Hellmann J (1997) Results of experimental theoretical studies of the azeotropic refrigerant R 507. Int J Refrig 20:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Snelson WK, Linton JW, System drop-in tests of refrigerant blend R 125/ R 143/ R 134a (44%/52%/4%) compared to R 502. ASHRAE Trans. Res. No. 3834, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  33. Park K, Jung D (2008) Performance of R290 and R1270 for R22 applications with evaporator and condenser temperature variation. J Mech Sci Technol 22:532–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi J, Kang B, Cho H (2014) Performance comparison between R22 and R744 solar-geothermal hybrid heat pumps according to heat source conditions. Renewable Energy 71:414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lorentzen G, Pettersen J (1993) A new efficient and environmentally benign system for car air-conditioning. Int J Refrig 16:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Park K, Lee Y, Jung D (2010) Performance of R170/R1270 mixture under air-conditioning and heat pumping conditions. J Mech Sci Technol 24:879–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bolaji BO, Huan Z (2012) Comparative analysis of the performance of hydrocarbon refrigerants with R22 in a sub-cooling heat exchanger refrigeration system. J Power Energy 226:882–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wongwises S, Kamboon A, Orachon B (2006) Experimental investigation of hydrocarbon mixtures to replace HFC-134a in an automotive air conditioning system. Energy Conv Manag 47:1644–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Z, Liu S, Tian L (2011) Thermodynamic analysis of air cycle refrigeration system for Chinese train air conditioning. Syst Eng Procedia 1:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Choudhari CS, Sapali SN (2017) Performance investigation of natural refrigerant R290 as a substitute to R22 in refrigeration systems. Energy Procedia 109:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cox N, Mazur V, Colbourne D (2009) The development of azeotropic ammonia refrigerant blends for industrial process applications. In: Ammonia refrigeration technology international conference, Ohrid

    Google Scholar 

  42. Maclaine IL, Leonardi E (1997) Why hydrocarbons save energy? Aust AIRAH J 51:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  43. Park K, Seo T, Jung DS (2007) Performance of alternative refrigerants for residential air conditioning applications. Appl Energy 84:985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, ITER, SOA (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, 751030, India

    Amaresh Mohapatra, Amit Kumar Prusty, Jajneswar Nanda, Sankar Narayan Das & Harsh Pandey

Authors
  1. Amaresh Mohapatra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amit Kumar Prusty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jajneswar Nanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sankar Narayan Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Harsh Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar Prusty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, India

    Saroj Kumar Acharya

  2. Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India

    Dipti Prasad Mishra

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohapatra, A., Prusty, A.K., Nanda, J., Das, S.N., Pandey, H. (2021). Potential Refrigerants and Their Effect on the Environment—A Review. In: Acharya, S.K., Mishra, D.P. (eds) Current Advances in Mechanical Engineering . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4795-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4795-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4794-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4795-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation