Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation of \(\beta \) Chaotic Map Enabled Grey Wolf Optimizer on Protein Structure Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

  • 916 Accesses

Abstract

Protein Structure Prediction (PSP) is a problem of bioinformatics. It is a proven challenging problem due to two reasons, the first one is that the accuracy of prediction methods can directly affect clinical investigation, drug synthesis and curing methodologies and second one is the computational complexity of the problem, especially when the size of sequence is large. Hence, in recent years, applications of several metaheuristic algorithms have been reported in this area. The paper presents a comprehensive study of application of \(\beta \)-chaotic map enabled Grey Wolf Optimizer (\(\beta \)-GWO) and it’s comparison with other prominent variants of GWO in the protein structure prediction. A bench of artificial and real protein sequences is proposed and evaluation of the algorithm and variants is conducted. It is observed that mean free energy values obtained from (\(\beta \)-GWO) algorithm are superior to other variants of GWO and GWO itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181(4096):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jana ND, Das S, Sil J (2018) Backgrounds on protein structure prediction and metaheuristics. In: A metaheuristic approach to protein structure prediction. Springer, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saxena A, Kumar R (2020) Chaotic variants of grasshopper optimization algorithm and their application to protein structure prediction. In: Applied nature-inspired computing: algorithms and case studies. Springer, pp 151–175

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saxena A (2019) A comprehensive study of chaos embedded bridging mechanisms and crossover operators for grasshopper optimisation algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 132:166–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li B, Chiong R, Lin M (2015) A balance-evolution artificial bee colony algorithm for protein structure optimization based on a three-dimensional ab off-lattice model. Comput Biol Chem 54:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Li B, Lin M, Liu Q, Li Y, Zhou C (2015) Protein folding optimization based on 3D off-lattice model via an improved artificial bee colony algorithm. J Mol Model 21(10):261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jana ND, Sil J, Das S (2017) Selection of appropriate metaheuristic algorithms for protein structure prediction in ab off-lattice model: a perspective from fitness landscape analysis. Inf Sci 391:28–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cutello V, Nicosia G, Pavone M, Timmis J (2007) An immune algorithm for protein structure prediction on lattice models. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(1):101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonçalves R, Goldbarg MC, Goldbarg EF, Delgado MR (2008) Warping search: a new metaheuristic applied to the protein structure prediction. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 349–350

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tantar A-A, Melab N, Talbi E-G (2008) A grid-based genetic algorithm combined with an adaptive simulated annealing for protein structure prediction. Soft Comput 12(12):1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abual-Rub MS, Al-Betar MA, Abdullah R, Khader AT (2012) A hybrid harmony search algorithm for ab initio protein tertiary structure prediction. Netw Model Anal Health Inf Bioinf 1(3):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dash T, Sahu PK (2015) Gradient gravitational search: an efficient metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization. J Comput Chem 36(14):1060–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stillinger FH, Head-Gordon T, Hirshfeld CL (1993) Toy model for protein folding. Phys Rev E 48(2):1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li B, Li Y, Gong L (2014) Protein secondary structure optimization using an improved artificial bee colony algorithm based on ab off-lattice model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 27:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta E, Saxena A (2015) Robust generation control strategy based on grey wolf optimizer. J Electr Syst 11(2):174–188

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saxena A, Kumar R, Mirjalili S (2020) A harmonic estimator design with evolutionary operators equipped grey wolf optimizer. Expert Syst Appl 145:113125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khandelwal A, Bhargava A, Sharma A, Sharma H (2018) Modified grey wolf optimization algorithm for transmission network expansion planning problem. Arab J Sci Eng 43(6):2899–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saxena A, Kumar R, Das S (2019) \(\beta \)-chaotic map enabled grey wolf optimizer. Appl Soft Comput 75:84–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saxena A, Soni BP, Kumar R, Gupta V (2018) Intelligent grey wolf optimizer-development and application for strategic bidding in uniform price spot energy market. Appl Soft Comput 69:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khandelwal A, Bhargava A, Sharma A (2019) Voltage stability constrained transmission network expansion planning using fast convergent grey wolf optimization algorithm. Evol Intell pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang B, Zhang X, Tao Y, Shu H, Fang Z (2017) Grouped grey wolf optimizer for maximum power point tracking of doubly-fed induction generator based wind turbine. Energy Conv Manage 133:427–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pradhan M, Roy PK, Pal T (2018) Oppositional based grey wolf optimization algorithm for economic dispatch problem of power system. Ain Shams Eng J 9(4):2015–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Long W, Liang X, Cai S, Jiao J, Zhang W (2017) A modified augmented lagrangian with improved grey wolf optimization to constrained optimization problems. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors are thankful for the fully financial support from the CRS, RTU (ATU), TEQIP-III of Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, Rajasthan, India. (Project Sanction No. TEQIP-III/RTU (ATU)/CRS/2019-20/33).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akash Saxena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saxena, A., Shekhawat, S., Sharma, A., Sharma, H., Kumar, R. (2021). Performance Evaluation of \(\beta \) Chaotic Map Enabled Grey Wolf Optimizer on Protein Structure Prediction. In: Gao, XZ., Kumar, R., Srivastava, S., Soni, B.P. (eds) Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4604-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics