Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relocation and Informal Settlements Upgrading in South Africa: The Case Study of Mangaung Township, Free State Province

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Housing and SDGs in Urban Africa

Part of the book series: Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements ((ACHS))

  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

Despite being a global phenomenon, the practice and implementation of the informal settlement upgrading policy as a possible alternative to conventional public housing policy, has a unique history in post-apartheid South Africa. Some case studies have revealed that shack dwellers have experienced tenure security whether they were going to reside on the same stands with upgrading, move to transition camps while upgrading was in process or whether they had the possibility of being relocated to a new housing development project. Relocation is often resisted in that it threatens existing livelihoods, continued schooling and community networks and, not least, the home. Against this background, this chapter has a threefold aim. First, it assesses the knowledge and policy gap created by a pro-in situ approach to informal settlement upgrading in South Africa. Second, it contributes new evidence from an analysis of households’ perceptions of basic service infrastructure, amenities and governance as expressed through a survey, in-depth qualitative interviews and focus group discussions in a relocation site in Mangaung Township (Bloemfontein). Third, it demonstrates how informal settlement upgrading through relocation may undermine the principle of participatory project planning and design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott J (2002) An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. Habitat Int 26(3):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adebayo P (2008) Still no room in the inn: post-apartheid housing policy and the challenges of integrating the poor in South African Cities. http://www.courses.arch.ntua.gr/fsr/134809/postapartheid-1.doc.pdf. Accessed 20 Septe 2014

  3. Bassett EM (2001) Institutions and informal settlements: the planning implications of the community land trust experiment in Kenya. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann T (2003) Harnessing people’s power: policy-makers’ options for scaling up the delivery of housing subsidies via people’s housing process. Research paper, Housing Finance Resources Programme, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botes L (1999) Community participation in the upgrading of informal settlements: theoretical and practical guidelines. Research paper, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein

    Google Scholar 

  6. Botes L, Krige S, Wessels J et al (1991) Informal settlements in Bloemfontein: a case study of migration patterns, socio-economic profile, living conditions and future housing expectations. Research report, Urban Foundation, Bloemfontein

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel C (2001) Integrated programme for social inclusion in Santo Andre, Brazil. Research paper, Un-Habitat Thematic Committee, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Housing (1994) White paper on housing: a new housing policy and strategy for South Africa. Government Gazette No, Pretoria, p 16178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Housing (2004) “Breaking new ground” a comprehensive plan for the development of sustainable human settlements. Department of Housing, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farber T (2017) Informal settlements are here to stay. Sunday Times, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Govender T (2011) The health and sanitation status of specific low-cost housing communities as contrasted with those occupying backyard dwellings in the City of Cape Town, South Africa. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harris R (2003) A double irony: the originality and influence of John F.C. Turner. Habitat Int 27(2):245–269

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huchzermeyer M (2001) Concent and contradiction: scholarly responses to the capital subsidy model for informal settlement intervention in South Africa. Urban Forum 21(1):71–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huchzermeyer M (2004) From “contravention of laws” to “lack of rights”: redefining the problem of informal settlements in South Africa. Habitat Int 28:333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huchzermeyer M (2006) The new instrument for upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: contributions and constraints. In: Huchzermeyer M, Karam A (eds) Informal settlements: a perpetual challenge?. UCT Press, Cape Town, pp 41–61

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huchzermeyer M (2009) The struggle for in situ upgrading of informal settlements: a reflection on cases in Gauteng. Dev South Afr 26(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huchzermeyer M (2010) A legacy of control? The capital subsidy for housing and informal settlement intervention in South Africa. Int J Urban Reg Res 27(3):591–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jordhus-Lier D (2015) Community resistance to megaprojects: the case of the N2 Gateway project in Joe Slovo informal settlement, Cape Town. Habitat Int 45:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kessides C (1997) World Bank experience with the provision of infrastructure services for the urban poor: preliminary identification and review of the best practices. Research paper, World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lalloo K (1999) Arenas of contested citizenship: housing policy in South Africa. Habitat Int 23(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marais L (2013) Resources policy and mine closure in South Africa: the case of the free state goldfields. Res Policy 38(3):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marais L, Cloete J (2014) “Dying to get a house?” The health outcomes of the South African low-income housing programme. Habitat Int 43(1):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marais L, Krige S (1999) Post-apartheid housing policy and initiatives in South Africa: reflections on the Bloemfontein-Botshabelo-Thaba ‘Nchu Region. Urban Forum 10(2):115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marais L, Krige S (1997) The upgrading of freedom square informal settlement in Bloemfontein: lessons for future low-income housing. Urban Forum 8(2):176–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marais L, Ntema J (2013) The upgrading of an informal settlement in South Africa: two decades onwards. Habitat Int 39:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marais L, Ntema J, Cloete J, Lenka M et al (2018) Informal settlement upgrading, assets and poverty alleviation: evidence from longitudinal research in South Africa. Dev South Afr 35(1):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marais L, Ntema J, Cloete J, Venter A et al (2014) From informality to formality to informality: extralegal land transfers in an upgraded informal settlement of South Africa. Urbani Izziv 25:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marais L, Van Rensburg N, Botes L et al (2003) An empirical comparison of self-help housing and contractor-driven housing: evidence from Thabong (Welkom) and Mangaung (Bloemfontein). Urban Forum 14(4):347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matovu G (2000) Upgrading urban low-income settlements in Africa: constraints, potentials and policy options. Research report, Municipal Development Programme, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mehlomakulu T, Marais L (1999) Dweller perceptions of public and self-built houses: some evidence from Mangaung. J Family Ecol Consum Sci 27(2):92–102

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mistro RD, Hensher DA (2009) Upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: policy, rhetoric and what residents really value. Hous Stud 24(3):333–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Misselhorn M (2008) Position paper on informal settlement upgrading. Research paper, Urban LandMark, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mkhize N (2003) An investigation of how construction skills transfer leads to sustainable employment and housing improvements in incremental housing projects. Unpublished Masters dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mokoena M, Marais L (2008) An evaluation of post-apartheid housing delivery in Mangaung: a view from local government. In: Marais L, Visser G (eds) Spatialities of urban change: selected themes from Bloemfontein at the beginning of the 21st century. Sun Press, Stellenbosch, pp 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moolla R, Kotze N, Block L et al (2011) Housing satisfaction and quality of life in RDP houses in Braamfischerville, Soweto: a South African case study. Urbani Izziv 22(1):138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Narsai P, Taylor M, Jinabhai C, Stevens F et al (2013) Variations in housing satisfaction and health status in four lower socio-economic housing typologies in the eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu-Natal. Dev South Afr 30(3):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ntema J (2017) Service infrastructure, housing consolidation and informal settlement upgrading: reflections from longitudinal research in free state goldfields, South Africa. Afr Insight 47(2):77–95

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ntema LJ (2011) Self-help housing in South Africa: paradigms, policy and practice. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ntema J, Marais L (2013) Comparing low-income housing outcomes in self-help and contractor-driven projects: the case for longitudinal research. Urban Forum 24(3):389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ntema J, Marais L, Cloete J, Lenka M et al (2017) Social disruption, mine closure and housing policy: evidence from the Free State Goldfields, South Africa. Nat Res Forum 41(1):30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Platzky L, Walker C (1985) The surplus people: forced removals in South Africa. Ravan Press, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sebake N (2010) Does participating in the development of medium-density mixed housing projects make a difference in the residents’ satisfaction with the quality of their environment?. Research paper, CSIR, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  43. Skinner RJ (1983) Community participation: its scope and organization. In: Skinner RJ, Rodell MJ (eds) People, poverty and shelter: problems of self-help housing in the Third World. Methuen, London, pp 125–150

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sliuzas R (2003) Opportunities for enhancing communication in settlement upgrading with geographic information technology-based support tools. Habitat Int 27:613–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tissington K (2011) Demolishing development at gabon informal settlement: public interest litigation beyond modderklip? South Afr J Hum Rights 27(1):192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Turner J (1976) Housing by people: towards autonomy in building environment. Marion Byers, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Uji ZA (1998) The squatter house in Nigeria: a triumph of self-determination, self-help and decision making. J Environ Sci 1(2):104–114

    Google Scholar 

  48. United Nations (2015) The world population prospects: 2015 revision. United Nations, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Van der Walt S (2016) Ageing workforce in water sector a worry-AG. News 24:1

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ward PM (1982) Self-help housing: a critique. Mansell, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ziblim A (2013) The dynamics of informal settlements upgrading in South Africa: legislative, and policy context, problems, tensions and contradictions. Research report, Habitat for Humanity International, Slovakia

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zunguzane N, Smallwood J, Emuze F et al (2012) Perceptions of the quality of low-income houses in South Africa: defects and their causes. Acta Structillia 19(1):19–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge the financial contribution of the National Research Foundation (South Africa) for the fieldwork for this chapter (Grant no: 89788).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Settlements, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa

    John Ntema

Authors
  1. John Ntema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ntema .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

    Timothy Gbenga Nubi

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Stirlingshire, UK

    Isobel Anderson

  3. University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

    Taibat Lawanson

  4. University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

    Basirat Oyalowo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ntema, J. (2021). Relocation and Informal Settlements Upgrading in South Africa: The Case Study of Mangaung Township, Free State Province. In: Nubi, T.G., Anderson, I., Lawanson, T., Oyalowo, B. (eds) Housing and SDGs in Urban Africa. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4424-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4424-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4423-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4424-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation