Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Pedagogical Framework with Integration of TPACK for Mobile Interactive System in Teaching Mathematics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 724))

Abstract

Although there is a variety of technology available in 21st century, the way classes and lesson being conducted are still mostly remaining the same which is teaching via one-way communication. One-way communication teaching process surfastces issues like lack of interaction where minimal discussion is going on during teaching session, Since the interaction between teachers and students are fairly poor, limited classroom activity can be expected such as “Question and Answer” which lead to the increment of boredom in classes and lessons among students. As the teaching process is leaning towards instructional, students’ feedback is usually being overlooked. Hence, since the availability of educational technology is getting more common nowadays, the integration of technology in classroom is encouraged changing the teaching and learning environment including knowledge delivery method from teacher perspective. Introducing mobile interactive system allows teachers deliver their knowledge differently, however, they are required to adapt and get familiar with the educational technology for improving teaching experience. Therefore, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework is applied in this paper to assess teachers using the seven elements of the framework. This paper is aimed to address the issues faced by conventional classroom and identify the effectiveness of teachers conducting classes using educational technology with the application of TPACK framework. Proposed TPACK framework is formed with the integration of three elements which are teachers’ efficiency, students’ performance and students’ engagement representing the outcome of current TPACK framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hoffmann MM, Ramirez AYF (2018) Students’ attitudes toward teacher use of technology in classrooms. In: Multicultural education. Caddo Gap Press. LNCS, vol 9999, pp 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang LYK, Lew SL, Lau SH, Leow MC (2019) Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788

  3. Hussain M, Zhu W, Zhang W, Abidi SMR (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Comput Intell Neurosci https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186

  4. Xerri MJ, Radford K, Shacklock K (2018) Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. High Educ 75(4):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milenković A, Dimitrijević S (2019) Advantages and disadvantages of heuristic teaching in relation to traditional teaching-the case of the parallelogram area. European Mathematics Society. https://dms.rs/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Zbornik-ERME.pdf#page=75

  6. Otukile-Mongwaketse M (2018) Teacher centered dominated approaches: their implications for todays inclusive classrooms. Int J Psychol Counselling 10(2):11–21. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijpc2016.0393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobbins C, Denton P (2017) MyWallMate: an investigation into the use of mobile technology in enhancing student engagement. TechTrends 61(6):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0188-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris NP, Lambe J, Ciccone J, Swinnerton B (2016) Mobile technology: students perceived benefits of apps for learning neuroanatomy. J Comput Assist Learn 32(5):430–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebrahim AA, Tawfik AE (2018) Mobile applications for education. Int J Learn Teach 251–254. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.4.3.251-254

  10. Dey S (2019). Elementary education in 19th-century Bengal education policy of the British. Econ Polit Weekly 54(30):37–44.2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith V, Wortley A (2017) “Everyone’s a comedian”. No really, they are: using humor in the online and traditional classroom. J Instruct Res 6(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.3

  12. Malik RS (2018) Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. J Sustain Dev Educ Res 2(1):9. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussin A (2018) Education 4.0 made simple: ideas for teaching. Int J Educ Literacy Stud 6(92). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92

  14. Krishnasamy S, Ling LS, Kim TC (2020) Improving learning experience of probability and statistics using multimedia system. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 15(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guerra A, Spliid CM (2018) Pedagogical development for course change and academic staff expectations. In: Engineering 2030: conceptualization of Industry 4.0 and its implications for engineering education, 7th edn. pp 572–582. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/302786154/2018_IRSPBL_Proceedings_Innovation_PBL_and_Competence.pdf#page=562

  16. Zerihun Z, Kassahun A, Wassie C, Ebrie S, Rebso M (2019) Students’ academic performance in conventional and alternative schooling: field based evidence. Eur J Altern Educ Stud 4(2). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3572787

  17. Dewey J (1916) Democracy and Education. Free Press, New York http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/dewey.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2005

  18. Çimşir BT, Uzunboylu H (2019) Awareness training for sustainable development: development, implementation and evaluation of a mobile application. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030611

  19. Etcuban JO, Pantinople LD (2018) The effects of mobile application in teaching high school mathematics. Int Electron J Math Educ 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906

  20. Fabian K, Topping KJ, Barron IG (2018) Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educ Technol Res Dev 66(5):1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan M, JeyaGopi R (2019) Evaluating readiness in using mobile devices for educational purposes among educators and students. In: International conference on innovation and technopreneurship 2019, vol 2019, no 007. http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/1280/1/vol.2019_007.pdf

  22. Sarwate A, Tsuchiya T, Freeman J (2018) Collaborative coding with music: two case studies with EarSketch. In: Monschke J, Guttandin C, Schnell N, Jenkinson T, Schaedler J (eds.) Proceedings of the international web audio conference. TU Berlin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qBVSCRpggg

  23. Gulnar A (2018) Modern teacher role for increasing the students’ competence in pedagogical specialty. Opcion

    Google Scholar 

  24. Warren LL (2018) Behaviors of teacher leaders in the classroom. Psychol Behav Sci 7(6):104–108. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180706.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bih Ni L, Rabe Z, Asyikin Hassan N (2018) World academy of science, engineering and technology. Int J Educ Pedagogical Sci Teach Leadersh Dimension Hist Learn 12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329771175_Teachers_Leadership_Dimension_in_History_Learning

  26. Dekhane S, Xu X, Tsoi MY (2013) Mobile app development to increase student engagement and problem solving skills. J Inf Syst Educ 24(4):299–308

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zaheer Abdul Ghafoor YA (2018) Integrating MALL into english flipped classroom at the tertiary level. India’s High Educ Authority UGC Approv List J Ser Number 18(2):98–108. www.languageinindia.com

  28. Putra CA (2018) Enhanced learning outcomes using interactive edutainment learning method. In: Proceedings international conference BKSPTIS 2018

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rahman MA, Ling LS, Yin OS (2020). Augmented reality for learning calculus: a research framework of interactive learning system. In: Lecture notes in electrical engineering. Springer, vol 603, pp 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0058-9_47

  30. Raju B (2020) Innovations and best practices towards quality education. Aayushi Int Interdiscip Res J (AIIRJ)., 40(50):2258–2262. https://archives.tpnsindia.org/index.php/sipn/article/view/3710/3593

  31. Fairholme College Fairholme College Pedagogical Framework of Learning and Teaching (2018). https://www.fairholme.qld.edu.au/module/documents/download/1537

  32. Naziri F, Rasul MS, Affandi HM (2019) Importance of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in design and technology subject. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 9(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i1/5366

  33. Utami P, Pahlevi FR, Santoso D, Fajaryati N, Destiana B, Ismail ME (2019) Android-based applications on teaching skills based on TPACK analysis. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/535/1/012009

  34. Rahman SMM, Krishnan VJ, Kapila V (2017) Exploring the dynamic nature of TPACK framework in teaching STEM using robotics in middle school classrooms. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-28336

  35. Vasodavan V, Dewitt D, Alias N (2019) TPACK in higher education: analysis of the collaborative tools used by lecturers. Asia Pac J Curriculum Teach 7:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  36. Malik S, Rohendi D, Widiaty I (2019) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: a literature review. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karns SJ (2019) Pairing a learning activity types short course with collaborative curriculum design: an approach to impact teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge. Cyberlaw Global E-business. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-828-4.chtpg

  38. Nurhadi D, Purwaningsih E, Masjkur K, Nyan-Myau L (2019) Using TPACK to map teaching and learning skills for vocational high school teacher candidates in Indonesia. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.9

  39. Oyelere SS, Suhonen J, Wajiga GM, Sutinen E (2018) Design, development, and evaluation of a mobile learning application for computing education. Educ Inf Technol 23(1):467–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9613-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stathopoulou A, Karabatzaki Z, Tsiros D, Katsantoni S, Drigas A (2019) Mobile apps the educational solution for autistic students in secondary education. Int J Interact Mob Technol 13(2):89–101. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i02.9896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karabatzaki Z, Stathopoulou A, Kokkalia G, Dimitriou E, Loukeri PI, Economou A, Drigas A (2018) Mobile application tools for students in secondary education. An evaluation study. Int J Interact Mob Technol 12(2):142–161. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8158

  42. Şengül M, Türel YK (2019) Teaching Turkish as a Foreign language with interactive whiteboards: a case study of multilingual learners. Technol Knowl Learn 24(1):101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9350-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zimmermann P, Stallings L, Pierce R, Largent D (2018) Classroom interaction redefined: multidisciplinary perspectives on moving beyond traditional classroom spaces to promote student engagement. J Learn Spaces 7(1):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kaewunruen S (2019) Enhancing railway engineering student engagement using interactive technology embedded with infotainment. Educ Sci 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020136

  45. Cronhjort M, Filipsson L, Weurlander M (2018) Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teach Math Appl 37(3):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/TEAMAT/HRX007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kukulska-Hulme A, Viberg O (2018) Mobile collaborative language learning: state of the art. British J Educ Technol Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580

  47. Lew SL, Ooi SY, Muthukumar Y, Rahman A (2018) Improving interactivity via icontrol: a presentation mobile app. In: Proceedings of the European conference on e-learning, ECEL, vol 2018, pp 308–315. Academic Conferences Limited

    Google Scholar 

  48. Putra CA (2018) Enhanced learning outcomes using interactive edutainment learning method. In: Proceedings international conference Bksptis 2018, pp 219–224. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/bksptis/article/view/3576/2614

  49. Ruihu W, Guoli Y (2019) Exploration and Practice of Mobile InteractiveInternent Classroom Teaching Based on UMU. EasyChair. https://wvvw.easychair.org/publications/preprint_open/qJh5

  50. Dokun O, Nat C, Muesser, Samson F (2019) An investigation of student’s interactivity in the classroom and interactivity within learning management system to improve learning outcomes. Croatian J Educ—Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje 21. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i1.3085

  51. Alexandrovna RN (2018) Development of Independence among future primary school teachers by applying interactive learning methods. J Educ E-Learn Res 5(2):118–121 https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2018.52.118.121

  52. Woo P, Shahril AM, Azmi E, Rosli H (2019) Interactive learning online: a case study of front office teaching and learning in higher learning institution in Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i15/5101

  53. Liliarti N, Kuswanto H (2018) Improving the competence of diagrammatic and argumentative representation in physics through android-based mobile learning application. Int J Instruct 11(3):106–122. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1138a

  54. Kutluca T, Yalman M, Tum A (2019) Use of interactive whiteboard in teaching mathematics for sustainability and its effect on the role of teacher. Discourse Commun Sustain Educ 10(1):113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2019-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Olivares DD, Castillo RR (2018) ICT in the classroom: primary education student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum. Educ Inf Technol 23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4

  56. Tsai C-C (2019) A study of taiwanese elementary school english as a foreign language: teachers’ beliefs, advantages, and difficulties of using interactive whiteboards. Asia-Pac Soc Sci Rev 19:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  57. Benoit A (2018) Investigating the impact of interactive whiteboards in higher education: a case study. J Learn Spaces 7(1):76–90

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ahmad W, Ali Z (2019) Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) effectiveness in vocabulary achievement and motivation: Saudi EFL learners’ perceptions and insights. Bull Adv Eng Stud 2(2):90–103. https://doi.org/10.31559/baes2019.2.2.5

  59. Olivares DD, Castillo RR (2018) ICT in the classroom: primary education student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum. Educ Inf Technol 23(6):2309–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Torres-Carrion PV, Gonzalez-Gonzalez CS, Aciar S, Rodriguez-Morales G (2018) Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. In: IEEE global engineering education conference, EDUCON, vol 2018, pp 1364–1373. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363388

  61. Adams C (2019) TPACK model: the ideal modern classroom. In: Technology and the curriculum: summer (2019). https://techandcurr2019.pressbooks.com/chapter/tpack-modern-classroom/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded and supported by Multimedia University and Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia

    Daniel Lai, Lew Sook Ling & Ooi Shih Yin

Authors
  1. Daniel Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lew Sook Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ooi Shih Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lew Sook Ling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

    Rayner Alfred

  2. Research Center for Entertainment Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan

    Hiroyuki Iida

  3. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Department of Informatics, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

    Haviluddin Haviluddin

  4. Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Environment, Society and Design, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Patricia Anthony

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lai, D., Ling, L.S., Yin, O.S. (2021). A Pedagogical Framework with Integration of TPACK for Mobile Interactive System in Teaching Mathematics. In: Alfred, R., Iida, H., Haviluddin, H., Anthony, P. (eds) Computational Science and Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 724. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4069-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4069-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4068-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4069-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation