Skip to main content

Compulsory Voting: Activating the Demos and Enhancing Procedural Democracy in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Century of Compulsory Voting in Australia

Part of the book series: Elections, Voting, Technology ((EVT))

Abstract

This chapter argues that compulsory voting significantly enhances the legitimacy of Australian democracy by ensuring that it optimises the values of procedural democracy. For proceduralists, a political system cannot be legitimized unless the process that establishes it is itself legitimate. In ‘authentic’ electoral democracies, it is vitally important that electoral procedures are duly complied with for the result to be deemed legitimate. The five criteria for judging whether this has occurred are: ‘political equality’, ‘effective participation’, ‘enlightened understanding’, ‘final control of the agenda by the demos’ and ‘inclusiveness’. Compulsory voting, as it is practised in Australia, is better at fulfilling these standards than almost every other comparable voluntary-voting system due to its ease of use and access, capacity to deliver high and socially even turnout and tendency to inspire a more informed, alert and critical public. It also produces two desired effects: greater levels of equality and lower levels of corruption. It is argued that, in order to enhance democratic legitmacy, the ‘inclusiveness’ criterion should be more demanding to ensure that the entire demos not only has the right to vote but actually votes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is the case at least until such time as an equally reliable method for assuring universal participation is found.

  2. 2.

    Youth can be generally treated as a surrogate for other forms of social and economic exclusion.

  3. 3.

    See Hill (2000) for a review of the literature here.

  4. 4.

    Hans Kelsen defines ‘democratic elections’ as ‘those which are based on universal, equal, free and secret suffrage’ while Dahl lists ‘equal votes’ or ‘political equality’ first in his list of five criteria for judging the democratic legitimacy of procedural democracies (Kelsen 1955, p. 3; Dahl 1979, p. 101).

  5. 5.

    A positive right is an entitlement to certain goods and services; a right becomes ‘material’ when those things are either provided or not prevented from being obtainable (see Dowding and van Hees 2003). In such cases the right has been exercised, or is at least readily exercisable.

  6. 6.

    Voting is not compulsory for Australians living in the Antarctic due to the difficulties in ensuring that the ballot is cast in secret.

  7. 7.

    Even so, it should noted that because executive governments have the power to appoint the heads of electoral commissions ‘bi-partisanship over appointments’ can occasionally ‘deteriorat[e]’ (Orr et al. 2003, p. 400).

  8. 8.

    The penalties in Australia for failure to attend a polling booth in national elections are relatively mild: initially, the AEC sends the absentee a ‘please explain’ letter with the option of paying a $20 fine to settle the matter. If a satisfactory reason for abstention is provided, the matter is dropped.

Bibliography

  • Ackerman, S. R. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1944). Aristotle in 23 volumes (Vol. 21, H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. R. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beramendi, P., & Anderson, C. J. (2008). Income inequality and democratic representation. In P. Beramendi & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Democracy, inequality and representation (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, S. (2009). Full participation: A comparative study of compulsory voting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2009). Polluting the polls: When citizens should not vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87(4), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Hill, L. (2014). Compulsory voting: For and against. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bukovansky, M. (2006). The hollowness of anti-corruption discourse. Review of International Political Economy, 13(2), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S., & McAllister, I. (2019). Trends in Australian political opinion: Results from the Australian Election Study 1987–2019. ANU. https://australianelectionstudy.org/wp-content/uploads/Trends-in-Australian-Political-Opinion-1987-2019.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2019.

  • Caplan, B. (2009). Majorities against utility: Implications of the failure of the miracle of aggregation. Social Philosophy and Policy, 26(1), 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceva, E., & Ferretti, M. P. (2017). Political corruption. Philosophy Compass, 12(12), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, L., Chesterman, J.‚ & Hill, L. (2009). The Politics of Human Rights in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., & Olivera, M. (2008). Does compulsory voting help equalize incomes? Economics and Politics, 20(3), 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdova, A., & Rangel, G. (2017). Addressing the gender gap: The effect of compulsory voting on women’s electoral engagement. Comparative Political Studies, 50(2), 264–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1979). Procedural democracy. In P. Laslett & J. S. Fishkin (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (5th Series, pp. 97–133). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., Denemark, D., & Bowler, S. (2007). Trust, citizenship and participation: Australia in comparative perspective. In D. Denemark, G. Meagher, S. Wilson, M. Western, & T. Phillips (Eds.), Australian social attitudes 2: Citizenship, work and aspirations (pp. 81–106). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K., & Van Hees, M. (2003). The construction of rights. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. A., Dundas, C. W., Rukambe, J., & Staino, S. (2006). Electoral management design: The International IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., Stoker, G., & Halupka, M. (2018). Australian’s trust in politicians and democracy hits an all-time low. https://theconversation.com/australians-trust-in-politicians-and-democracy-hits-an-all-time-low-new-research-108161. Accessed 17 July 2020.

  • Fowler, A. (2013). Electoral and policy consequences of voter turnout: Evidence from compulsory voting in Australia. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(2), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, A. (2015). Unequal participation worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2005). Are voters better represented? The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1206–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, K., & Setälä, M. (2007). Political trust, satisfaction and voter turnout. Comparative European Politics, 5(4), 400–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2000). Compulsory voting, political shyness and welfare outcomes. Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2002). On the reasonableness of compelling citizens to vote: The Australian case. Political Studies, 50(1), 80–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2010). Public acceptance of compulsory voting: Explaining the Australian case. Representation, 46(4), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2011). Increasing turnout using compulsory voting. Politics, 31(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2016). Voting turnout, equality, liberty and representation: Epistemic versus procedural democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19(5), 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. (2020). Australia’s democratic innovations. In J. Lewis & A. Tiernan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Australian politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. Q., & Leighley‚ J. E. (1992). The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates. American Journal of Political Science‚ 36(2)‚ 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L., & Rutledge-Prior, S. (2016). Young people and intentional informal voting in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., & Pelleriaux, K. (1998). Compulsory voting in Belgium: An application of the Lijphart thesis. Electoral Studies, 17(4), 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM). (2005). Report of the inquiry into the conduct of the 2004 Federal election and matters related thereto. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. S. (1997). Democracy and elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N. (2008). Evaluating Australian electoral reforms: 1983–2007 (Unpublished PhD thesis). Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (1955). Foundations of democracy. Ethics, 66(1), 1–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L., & Pontusson, J. (2005). Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, A. (2010). Compulsory voting: A critical perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 897–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louth, L., & Hill, L. (2005). Compulsory voting in Australia: Turnout with and without it. Australian Review of Public Affairs, 6(1), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackerras, M., & McAllister, I. (1999). Compulsory voting, party stability and electoral advantage in Australia. Electoral Studies, 18(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, V. A. (2008). Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-national Analysis of the Developed Democracies. European Journal of Political Research‚ 47(2)‚ 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, V. A., Jesuit‚ D. K., & Paradowski‚ P. R. (2014). Electoral Turnout and State Redistribution: A Cross-national Study of Fourteen Developed Countries. Political Research Quarterly‚ 67(2)‚ 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maley, M. (2001). Exploring expertise in electoral governance. In M. Sawer (Ed.), Elections: Full free and fair. Leichhardt: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. S. (2003). Voting’s rewards: Voter turnout, attentive publics and congressional allocation of federal money. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, G., Mercurio, B., & Williams, G. (2003). Australian electoral law: A stocktake. Election Law Journal, 2(3), 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Y., & Ensink, S. J. (2015). Differential responsiveness in Europe: The effects of preference difference and electoral participation. West European Politics, 38(3), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B. (2010). Increasing turnout: A compelling case? Politics, 30(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B. (2012). The democratic turnout ‘problem’. Political Studies, 60(2), 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, M. (2001). Pacemakers for the world? In M. Sawer (Ed.), Elections: Full, free and fair (pp. 1–27). Leichhardt: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard‚ J. (2015). Compulsory Voting and Political Knowledge: Testing a ‘Compelled Engagement’ Hypothesis. Electoral Studies‚ 40‚ 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. (2019). “Trust and attitudes to Australian democracy” ERRN Biennial Presentation, 14 November 2019, https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/3254240/Jill-Sheppard.pdf.

  • Shineman, V. (2018). If You Mobilize Them, They Will Become Informed: Experimental Evidence that Information Acquisition Is Endogenous to Costs and Incentives to Participate. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockemer, D., LaMontagne, B., & Scruggs, L. (2013). Bribes and ballots: The impact of corruption on voter turnout in democracies. International Political Science Review, 34(1), 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. (1995). Ethics in congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. (2005). Two concepts of corruption: Making electoral campaigns safe for democracy. George Washington Law Review, 73(5–6), 1036–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie‚ N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. (2004). What does corruption mean in a democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. (1999). Democracy. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, J. R. (2012). Rethinking corruption in an age of ambiguity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8(1), 453–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Hill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hill, L. (2021). Compulsory Voting: Activating the Demos and Enhancing Procedural Democracy in Australia. In: Bonotti, M., Strangio, P. (eds) A Century of Compulsory Voting in Australia. Elections, Voting, Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4025-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics