Skip to main content

The Use of Factor Analysis in Urban Research: The Case of the Metropolitan Area of Bilbao

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inequality and Uncertainty

Abstract

The study of “urban context” was specifically born of a concern surrounding the inequalities that, in an urban setting, become visible and obvious. The sociological tradition of this type of study goes back a long way. It began in the Chicago School in the 1930s with Park and his disciples. These studies received a significant methodological boost in 1955 with the Index of Dissimilarity (Duncan and Duncan in Am Sociol Rev 20: 210–217, 1955), as a basic indicator for measuring any type of urban residential segregation. The development of both one-dimensional and multi-dimensional measures led to a set of strategies that had the ultimate goal of creating socio-residential maps that would allow the urban reality to be quantified, qualified and explained. Therefore, after the segregation indexes, Social Area Analysis and Factorial Ecology made use of newly developed powerful statistical tools for handling large amounts of data, opening a more multi-dimensional line. In the analysis of urban structure, this analysis—Factorial—is used to isolate the principal dimensions that define the differences in the urban area. Currently, the application of the factorial analysis in urban investigation is common and helps us to understand the way in which the city is divided according to variables such as economic status, age, housing conditions or immigration. This paper aims to present the results of this type of analysis, combined with another such as Cluster or K-Means, for the metropolitan area of Bilbao, considering its benefits and limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Spanish, sección censal, a sub-unit of a municipality with a population of between 1000 and 2500, unless the population of the corresponding municipality is less.

  2. 2.

    Of the 36 variables initially included, 24 were selected for the final factorial solution.

  3. 3.

    The most recent census available, which did not become accessible until 2014.

  4. 4.

    Due to the size of the resulting dendrogram, it is not possible to reproduce it here. We based our decision on the conglomeration history, which shows the performance of the coefficient. It was decided to detain the classification at Stage 702, where the coefficient jumps from 1,725,473 to 1,936,364, thus giving 5 groups or strata.

  5. 5.

    A distrito is an administrative sub-division of the city. Bilbao is comprised of 8 distritos.

References

  • Antolín, E., Fernández, J. M., & Lorente, E. (2010). Estrategias de regeneración urbana y segregación residencial en Bilbao: apariencias y realidades. Ciudad y Territorio: Estudios Territoriales (163), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (1998). The Age of Migration. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cea d’Ancona, M. Á., & Valles Martínez, M. (2010). Xenofobias y xenofilias en clave biográfica. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checa Olmos, J. C. (2006). La diferenciación residencial. Conceptos y modelos empíricos para su comprensión. Granada: Editorial Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba, R. (2014). El modelo de urbanismo neoliberal enfocado en el turismo y el ocio como ejemplo de insostenibilidad. Encrucijadas-Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 8, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Muñoz, M. Á. (1989). Hacia un modelo de diferenciación residencial urbana en España. La aportación del análisis de áreas sociales y la ecología factorial. Estudios territoriales (31), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Aragón, I., & Shershneva, J. (2017). Convivencia en espacios de racismo institucionalizado. Empiria, 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullaondo, A. (2008). Inserción y lógica residencial de la inmigración extranjera en la ciudad. El caso de Barcelona (Tesis doctoral). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullaondo, et al. (2013). Variaciones residenciales y población extranjera. Leioa: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikuspegi. (2018). Panorámica de la inmigración. Leioa: Servicio editorial Universidad del País Vasco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittus, E. (1965). EW Burgess and DJ Bogue, “Contributions to Urban Sociology”(Book Review). Town Planning Review, 35(4), 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2013). Ciudades rebeldes: del derecho de la ciudad a la revolución urbana. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempen, R., & Şule Özüekren, A. (1998). Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1631–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavía, C. (1995). Areas sociales en el sistema urbano vasco. Oñati: IVAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo, J. J. (1989). Estructura urbana y diferenciación residencial: El caso de Bilbao. Madrid: CIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S. (2005). Social and Ethnic Segregation in Europe: Levels, Causes, and Effects. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natera, J. J. (2002). Heterogeneidad social y diferenciación residencial en Marbella. Málaga: Biblioteca Popular Malagueña.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevky, E., & Bell, W. (1955). Social Area Analysis. Theory, Illustrative Application and Computational Procedures. Stanford University Press, 3, 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, D. (1976). Social Bases to Social Areas. Social Areas in Cities, 1, 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2001). Parias urbanos. Marginalidad en la ciudad a comienzos del milenio. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weclawowiz, G. (1979). The Structure of Socio-Economic Space in Warsaw 1931 and 1970: A Study in Factorial Ecology. The Socialist City Spatial Structure and Urban Policy, 52, 387–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iraide Fernández Aragón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández Aragón, I., Lavía Martínez, C. (2020). The Use of Factor Analysis in Urban Research: The Case of the Metropolitan Area of Bilbao. In: Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Gómez, M., Pereira, P., Guarino, L., Kurtenbach, S., Villalón, J. (eds) Inequality and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9162-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9162-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9161-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9162-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics