Skip to main content

Triply Periodic Minimal Surface-Based Porous Scaffold Design and Analysis Subjected to Hard Tissue Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Methods in Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering ((LNMUINEN))

  • 1124 Accesses

Abstract

Porous structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) have occurred as appropriate candidates for scaffold design with high level of porosity and promising strength for bone replacement. This work describes a suitable procedure for design and modeling of 3D architecture of TPMS-based gyroid and primitive structures and identifying the optimal architecture for scaffold designing. Different models with varying porosity were reconstructed and analyzed to access the effective elastic moduli and compressive strength of each model. An optimal model that can be utilized in bone tissue replacement is identified eventually. Ti6Al4V which is considered as the best material for producing implants in conjunction with biocompatibility and strength is used in the study. The compression test performed by FEM revealed that the scaffold models with porosity level of 65 and 60% are best suited for cortical bone replacement and the model with 90% porosity can be used on the anatomical location, which are more inclined to cancellous bones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Almeida, H.A.: Design of tissue engineering scaffolds based on hyperbolic surfaces: structural numerical evaluation. Med. Eng. Phys. 36(8), 1033–1040 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, X.Y.: Additively manufactured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and the prediction of their mechanical behavior: a review. Materials 10(1), 50 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, N.: Mathematically defined gradient porous materials. Mater. Lett. 173, 136–140 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melchels, F.P.: Mathematically defined tissue engineering scaffold architectures prepared by stereolithography. Biomaterials 31(27), 6909–6916 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobbert, F.S.L.: Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: a unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater. 53, 572–584 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehboob, H.: Finite element modelling and characterization of 3D cellular microstructures for the design of a cementless biomimetic porous hip stem. Mater. Des. 149, 101–112 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammed, M.I.: Design of three-dimensional, triply periodic unit cell scaffold structures for additive manufacturing. J. Mech. Des. 140(7), 071701 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed, M.I.: Design and fabrication considerations for three dimensional scaffold structures. KnE Eng. 2(2), 120–126 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, X.: Minimal surface designs for porous materials: from microstructures to mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. 53(14), 10194–10208 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanquer, S.B.: Surface curvature in triply-periodic minimal surface architectures as a distinct design parameter in preparing advanced tissue engineering scaffolds. Biofabrication 9(2), 025001 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, J.: Porous scaffold design by solid T-splines and triply periodic minimal surfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 336, 333–352 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, S.: Lightweight of artificial bone models utilizing porous structures and 3D printing. Int. J. Performability Eng. 13(5), 633 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olivares, A.L.: Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30(30), 6142–6149 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melchels, F.P.: A poly (D, L-lactide) resin for the preparation of tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Biomaterials 30(23–24), 3801–3809 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauvin, R.: Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials 33(15), 3824–3834 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giannitelli, S.M.: Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10(2), 580–594 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maskery, I.: Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer 152, 62–71 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, X.: Fabrication and characterization of porous Ti6Al4V parts for biomedical applications using electron beam melting process. Mater. Lett. 63(3–4), 403–405 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Welsch, G., Boyer, R., Collings, E.W. (eds.): Materials properties handbook: titanium alloys. ASM international (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walker, J.M.: Design and mechanical characterization of solid and highly porous 3D printed poly (propylene fumarate) scaffolds. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2(1–2), 99–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dias, M.R.: Optimization of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering: a computational and experimental study. Med. Eng. Phys. 36(4), 448–457 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murr, L.E.: Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368(1917), 1999–2032 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Ketan, O.: Mechanical properties of a new type of architected interpenetrating phase composite materials. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2(2), 1600235 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montazerian, H.: Porous scaffold internal architecture design based on minimal surfaces: a compromise between permeability and elastic properties. Mater. Des. 126, 98–114 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, X.: Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83, 127–141 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi, K.: The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J. Biomech. 23(11), 1103–1113 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rho, J.Y.: Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 20(2), 92–102 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rho, J.Y.: Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J. Biomech. 26(2), 111–119 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, D.: Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing. Comput. Aided Des. 104, 87–99 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ataee, A.: Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications. Mater. Des. 137, 345–354 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kadkhodapour, J.: Failure mechanisms of additively manufactured porous biomaterials: effects of porosity and type of unit cell. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 50, 180–191 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Arabnejad, S.: Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 35(8), 1774–1783 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Arabnejad, S.: High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater. 30, 345–356 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kadkhodapour, J.: Investigating internal architecture effect in plastic deformation and failure for TPMS-based scaffolds using simulation methods and experimental procedure. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 43, 587–597 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Taniguchi, N.: Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 59, 690–701 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reichert, J.C.: The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials 30(12):2149–2163 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Rai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rati, V., Singh, N., Rai, S., Kumta, S. (2019). Triply Periodic Minimal Surface-Based Porous Scaffold Design and Analysis Subjected to Hard Tissue Reconstruction. In: Narayanan, R., Joshi, S., Dixit, U. (eds) Advances in Computational Methods in Manufacturing. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9072-3_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics