Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Managing the Asian Century ((MAAC))

Abstract

Ever since the “Wenchuan earthquake” in May 12, 2008, there are some other earthquakes every year in China. China seems at the stage with active earthquakes. However, there is nothing the government can do to prevent such natural disasters. Instead the government can only try to issue alert information and to build an efficient afterward recovering system. Earthquake insurance could be an effective way to provide additional recovering money besides government funds. But the question is whether consumers are willing to buy and pay for earthquake insurance if government is not paying. Therefore, this chapter is to investigate Chinese residents’ preferences for earthquake insurance, especially to analyze their willingness to accept and willingness to pay for earthquake insurance. Previous studies have shown that risk perception, social trust, and consumers’ characteristics have significant impact on consumers’ earthquake insurance. Thus the measure of association was used to analyze Chinese consumers’ preferences, followed by a short case for “Pearl River Delta” region in China. The data was collected though an online survey in Shenzhen, a core city in “Pearl River Delta” region. A total of 637 surveys were returned, and of those collected, 428 are valid. The results indicate that consumers are willing to buy and pay for earthquake insurance for higher-risk regions. However, for the lower-risk regions, government has to put more effort on increasing social trust for consumers. In addition, insurance companies need to provide earthquake property insurance product and earthquake life insurance product separately and together too according to consumers’ different preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne MJ, Hoyt RE (2000) The demand for flood insurance: empirical evidence. J Risk Uncertain 20(3):291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jametti M, von Ungern-Sternberg T (2010) Risk selection in natural-disaster insurance. J Inst Theor Econ 166(2):344–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J (2014). Washingtonpost. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2014/08/26/fewer-americanhomeowners-are-buying-earthquake-insurance-and-the-risk-is-growing/. Retrieved 09 Oct 2014

  • Johnson EJ, Hershey J, Meszaros J, Kunreuther HC (1993) Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J Risk Uncertain 7:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: J Econom Soc 47(2):263–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther HC (1978) Disaster insurance protection: public policy lessons. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E (2009) At war with the weather: managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran T (1995) Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanbo L (2001) Stable continental region earthquakes in South China. Pure Appl Geophys 158(2001):1583–1611

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 4(6):551–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32(1):395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard KM (2011) Living in Denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect 14(1):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Chang 15(4):308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker PJ, Kunreuther H (1979) An experimental study of insurance decisions. J Risk Insur 46(4):603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz A, Hasnain M (2002) Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent. Risk Decis Policy 7(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showers VE, Shotick JA (1994) The effects of household characteristics on demand for insurance: a Tobit analysis. J Risk Insur 61(3):492–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Corrigan B, Combs B (1977) Preference for insuring against probable small losses: insurance implications. J Risk Insur 44(2):237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VL (1968) Optimal insurance coverage. J Polit Econ 76(1):68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim J, Clayton S, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, Reser J, Stern P, Weber E (2009) Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multifaceted phenomenon and set of challenges. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Re (2014) Mind the risk: a global ranking of cities under threat from natural disasters. www.swissre.com by Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd

  • Wang M, Liao C, Yang S, Zhao W, Liu M, Shi P (2012) Are people willing to buy natural disaster insurance in China? Risk awareness, insurance acceptance, and willingness to pay. Risk Anal 32(10):1717–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KK, Zhao X (2001) Living with floods: victims’ perceptions in Beijing, Guangdong, China. Area 33(2):190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye T, Wang M (2013) Exploring risk attitude by a comparative experimental approach and its implication to disaster insurance practice in China. J Risk Res 16(7):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser R (1996) The economics of catastrophes. J Risk Uncertain 12(2–3):113–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaoju Ge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ge, J., Zhao, J., Nisar, S. (2016). New Consumers’ Perspective in Insuring Earthquakes. In: Foo, C. (eds) Diversity of Managerial Perspectives from Inside China. Managing the Asian Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-555-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics