Abstract
In this chapter, the authors attempt to investigate the possible connection between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and corporate financial performance in China. In the process, we utilize data on corporate social responsibility performance (proxied using CSR report ratings) and corporate financial performance (proxied using ROA&ROE and Tobin’s q). The overarching hypothesis may be phrased simply as: Is the company rewarded by its CSR activities from profitability perspective? The results suggest that there is significant link that indicates positive correlation between corporate social responsibility performance and corporate financial performance both in short term and long term. Most intriguingly is our finding of sharp contrast between the CSR mandatory corporations and voluntary corporations. The financial performances of corporations that are mandated (under obligation) to report on CSR activities are significantly higher than those of firms that volunteered (but not required by policy) such information. Good corporate social responsibility activities have impacts on both short- and long-term financial performances of the China firms. Corporations may achieve twin goals of earning profits and serving society. Industry executives and managers should embed CSR as part of overall corporate strategy as this will lead to improving short-term profitability and enhancing long-term competitive advantage. On the basis of our empirical finding of CSR activities to impact on profitability, we suggest a new body of thinking to be developed: there are strong financial dimensions to being socially responsible. Both investors and debt providers of companies ought to keenly emphasize good CSR practices especially in enhanced, quality reporting. Practically, it means that from a financial, fund-raising perspective, it pays for top management to emphasize a higher CSR performance.
This article is sponsored by the Humanity and Social Science Research Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education in China (Approval No. 12YJCZH118).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K (2002) Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus Soc 41:292–318
Berman SL, Wicks AC, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 42:488–506
Brammer S, Millington A (2005) Corporate reputation and philanthropy: an empirical analysis. J Bus Ethics 61:29–44
Brammer S, Millington A (2008) Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 29:1325–1343
Burke L, Logsdon JM, Mitchell W, Reiner M, Vogel D (1986) Corporate community involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area. Calif Manag Rev 28:122–141
Cui XM (2009) On the influencing factors for enterprise releasing social responsibility report-evidence from enterprise social responsibility reports by listed firms in 2008. J Nanjing Agric Uni (Social Science Edition) 9(4):40–46
Drumwright M (1994) Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a non-economic buying criterion. J Mark 58(3):1–19
Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22:125–139
Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strateg Manag J 30:261–285
Kang KH, Lee S, Huh C (2010) Impacts of positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities on company performance in the tourism industry. Int J Hosp Manag 29(1):72–82
Lee S, Park S (2009) Do socially responsible activities help hotels and casinos achieve their financial goals? Int J Hosp Manag 28:105–112
Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J Mark 70:1–18
Maignan I, Ferrell OC (2001) Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: an investigation of French businesses. J Bus Res 51(1):37–51
McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T (1988) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 31(6):854–872
Mendes-Da-Silva W, de Lira Alves LA (2004) The voluntary disclosure of financial information on the internet and the firm value effect in companies across Latin America. In: Universidad Navarra Barcelona, 13th International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society
Moskowitz MR (1972) Choosing socially responsible stocks. Bus Soc Rev 1(1):71–75
Moussavi F, Evans D (1986) An attributional approach to measuring corporate social performance. Paper presented at the academy of management meetings, San Diego, CA
Parket IR, Eilbirt H (1975) Social responsibility: the underlying factors. Bus Horiz 18(4):5–10
Robinson G, Dechant K (1997) Building a business case for diversity. Acad Manag Exec 11(3):21–31
Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559
Sen S, Bhattacharya B (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Mark Res 38(2):225–243
Shi P (2010) Corporate social responsibility report and corporate value. Jianghai Acad J 53(6):99–103
Solomon R, Hanson K (1985) It’s good business. Atheneum, New York
Stroup M, Neubert RL, Anderson JW (1987) Doing good, doing better: two views of social responsibility. Bus Horiz 30(2):22–25
Sturdivant FD, Ginter JL (1997) Corporate social responsiveness: management attitudes and economic performance. Calif Manag Rev 19(3):30–39
Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–310
Zhu S (2011) Corporate social responsibility, market evaluation and earnings information content. Account Res 11:27–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, Y., Foo, C.T. (2016). Managing CSR Inside China. In: Foo, C. (eds) Diversity of Managerial Perspectives from Inside China. Managing the Asian Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-555-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-555-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-554-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-555-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)