Skip to main content

Pressure Transient Behavior of Immiscible Water Alternating Gas (IWAG) Injection with and Without Relative Permeability Hysteresis Effects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICIPEG 2014

Abstract

Pressure transient tests can provide useful information for characterization and evaluation of reservoirs under secondary and tertiary processes if properly designed and analyzed. There are a number of literature concerning the injectivity and falloff testing of water or gas injection wells. However, the information available on immiscible water alternating gas (IWAG) injection tests is limited to falloff tests without considering the effect of trapped gas. In this study, the pressure transient behavior of IWAG injection and falloff tests with and without relative permeability hysteresis effect is investigated using simulated pressure data. The saturation distribution shows that gas relative permeability hysteresis increases the recovery of oil in IWAG injection. At early times, the pressure response of gas injectivity test exhibits the properties of the gas zone which is in contrast to the water injectivity test. The pressure-derivative curve of gas falloff test exhibits a long transition period with a half-slope before the late time radial flow. The pressure and pressure-derivative curves of the water injectivity test display a unit-slope line at early times which can mislead to conclusion of wellbore storage effects. It is shown that the hysteresis has a significant effect on the pressure and pressure-derivative behavior of an injectivity test, but less effect on a falloff test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B:

Formation volume factor, v/v

c:

Isothermal fluid compressibility, psi−1

h:

Thickness, ft

k:

Absolute permeability, md

p:

Pressure, psi

r:

Radial distance, ft

S:

Saturation, fraction

t:

Time, hrs

µ:

Viscosity, cp

ρ:

Density, lbm/ft

ϕ:

Porosity, fraction

∆:

Difference operator

f:

Formation

g:

Gas

i:

Initial

o:

Oil

r:

Relative

w:

Water

References

  1. M. Abbaszadeh and M. Kamal, “Pressure transient testing of water-injection wells,” SPERE, vol 4, no. 1, pp. 115-124, 1989, paper SPE 16744-PA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Satman, M. Eggenschwiller, and H. J. Ramey, “Interpretation of injection well pressure transient data in thermal oil recovery,” presented at the 1980 50th annula California meeting of SPE of AIME, Los Angeles, California, April 9-11, 1980, paper SPE 8908-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. B. Stenger, S. A. Al-Kendi, A. F. Al-Ameri, and A. B. Al-Katheeri, “Interpretation of immiscible WAG Pressure–Falloff Tests,” presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 1-4 November 2010, paper SPE 137062.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Oak, “Three-phase relative permeability of Berea sandstone,” presented at the SPE/DOE 17th symposium on EOR, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 22-25, 1990, paper SPE/DOE 20183-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. J. Spiteri and R. Juanes, “Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on the numerical simulation of WAG injection,” presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, Texas, September 26-29, 2004, paper SPE 89921-MS.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Eclipse 100 Technical description,” Schlumberger GeoQuest, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. G. Agarwal, “A new method to account for producing time effects when drawdown type curves are used to analyze pressure buildup and other test data,” presented at the 55th annual fall technical conference and exhibition of the society of petroleum engineers of AIME, Dallas, Texas, September 21-24, 1980, paper SPE 9289.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. L. Messner and R. L. Williams, “Application of pressure transient analysis in steam injection wells,” presented at the 1982 California Meeting of SPE, San Francisco, CA, March 24-26, 1982, paper SPE 10781-MS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) for providing the necessary financial support and research facility to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azeb D. Habte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Habte, A.D., Onur, M., Saaid, I.M.B. (2015). Pressure Transient Behavior of Immiscible Water Alternating Gas (IWAG) Injection with and Without Relative Permeability Hysteresis Effects. In: Awang, M., Negash, B., Md Akhir, N., Lubis, L. (eds) ICIPEG 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-368-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-368-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-367-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-368-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics