Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prevalence, Prevention, and Pedagogical Techniques: Academic Integrity and Ethical Professional Practice Among STEM Students

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Academic Integrity

Abstract

Although work in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields underlies the innovations that characterize living in the age of information, some research points to a public distrust of science and technology. While distrust may partly result from larger social trends, the public’s trust in science also relies on the integrity of individuals in STEM fields. Most often academic integrity is discussed in terms of cheating and plagiarism violations. However, given the need for STEM professionals to act ethically, any definition of academic integrity in STEM should reflect professional standards for ethical practice. This chapter reviews these standards and discusses how they can inform conceptualizations of and policies around academic integrity in STEM education. The chapter also explores the prevalence of and causes underlying academic integrity violations in STEM and examines the methods for promoting academic integrity among STEM students. The chapter concludes by identifying research directions that may inform efforts to promote integrity among STEM students and professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Mathematical Society. (2014). Ethical guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.ams.org/about-us/governance/policy-statements/sec-ethics

  • Amsberry, D. (2010). Deconstructing plagiarism: International students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. G., Smith, L. A., Henzi, D., & Demps, E. (2001). Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity at U.S. and Canadian dental schools. Journal of Dental Education, 71(8), 1027–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Cox, A. (2005). “At least they are learning something”: The hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, E. M. (2014). Comparing the demographics of students reported for academic dishonesty to those of the overall student population. Ethics and Behavior. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.978977

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, S. A., & Hendelsman, M. M. (2000). Graduate teaching assistants: Ethical training, beliefs, and practices. Ethics and Behavior, 10(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Horrocks, S., & Smith, J. (2002). Developing classroom practices to support NESB students in information systems course: Some preliminary findings. International Educaiton Journal, 3(4), 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., & Finelli, C. J. (2010). Using research to identify academic dishonesty deterrents among engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(5), 1156–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (1999). Collaboration or plagiarism: What happens when students work together. In B. Manaris (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th annual conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’99). SIGCSE Bulletin: A quarterly publication of the special interest group on Computer Science Education, 31 (pp. 52–55). Krakow: Association Computing Machinery. ISBN 1-58113-087-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournand, A. (1978). The code of the scientists and its relationship to ethics. Jurimetrics Journal, 18(3), 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J. (2009). The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. H., Rogers, D. P., & Harris, M. B. (2006). International engineering students – Avoiding plagiarism through understanding the Western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. (2000). How scientists think in the real world: Implications for science education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M. (2011). How to stop cheating (or at least slow it down). Chemical Engineering Education, 45(1), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fledderman, C. B., & Sanadhya, S. K. (2004). Engineering ethics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C., Gilmore, J., Pinder-Grover, T., Hatcher, M. (2015). Teaching assistant instructional development in engineering: A test of four programs. Paper to be presented at American Educational Research Association. Chicago. 16–20 Apr 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J., Hatcher, M. (2013, November). Evaluation findings and lessons learned from the graduate student instructor seminar. Professional and Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, J., Julesza, W. J., & Petterson, A. (2014). Teaching international students how to avoid plagiarism: Librarians and faculty in collaboration. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3/4), 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendijk, R. P. (2004). The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds. Minerva, 42(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happel, S.K., & Jennings, M.M. (2008). An economic analysis of academic dishonesty and its deterrence in higher education. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 25(2), 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Montgomery, S. M., Steneck, N. H. (2001). The current state of research on academic dishonesty among engineering students. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C., Pritchard, M., Rabins, M. J., & James, M. (2013). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy, and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Center for Academic Integrity. (n.d.). Fundamental values project. Retrieved from http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/resources-2.php

  • Jamal, K., & Bowie, N. E. (1995). Theoretical considerations for a meaningful code of professional ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. L. (1993). TA training from the TA’s point of view. Innovative Higher Education, 18(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, A. S., Robinson, S., Border, L., Chandler, E., Connolly, M., Jones Eaton, L., Gilmore, J., Griffith, L., Hanson, S., Pinder-Grover, T., von Hoene, L. (2012). Steps toward a framework for an intended curriculum for graduate and professional students: How we talk about what we do. In A. Kalish, S. Robinson (Eds.) Mapping the range of graduate student professional development, studies in Graduate and Professional Student Development, 14. Stillwater: New Forms Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J. B., West, T., Ravenscroft, S. P., & Shrader, C. B. (2005). Ethical distancing: Rationalizing violations of organizational norms. Business and Professional Ethics, 24(3), 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S. G., Berk, R., Wenger, N. S., & Lew, V. (1998). Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(1), 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krockover, G. H., Shepardson, D. P., Adams, P. E., Eichinger, D., & Nakhleh, M. (2002). Reforming and assessing undergraduate science instruction using collaborative action-based research teams. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 266–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D. (2006) Student plagiarism, faculty responsibility. Insidehighered.com. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/06/01/plagiarism

  • Lewis, A. (2006, October 7). Wily MBA students lead cheating pack. Denver Post. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_4433207

  • Lord, T., & Chiodo, D. (1995). A look at student cheating in college science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maramack, S., & Maline, M. B. (1993). Academic dishonesty among college students (Issues in Education). Washington, D.C: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 360 903).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. & Garry, M. (2006). NESB and ESB students’ attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Maytham, B., Case, J., & Fraser, D. (2005). Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (1997). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M., & Holmberg, M. (2005). Using the Google search engine to detect word-for-word plagiarism in Master’s these: A preliminary study. College Student Journal, 39, 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, U. (2005). Academic integrity: An awareness and development issue for students and staff. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(3), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. (1992, March). Cheating: Is academic dishonesty part for the course? American Society for Engineering Education Prism, 7(1), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan State University (n.d.) What is academic integrity? Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/~ombud/academic-integrity/What%20is%20Academic%20Integrity.html

  • Miller, A. D., Murdock, T. B., Anderman, E. M., & Poindexter, A. L. (2007). Who are all these cheaters? Characteristics of academically dishonest students. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 9–32). Burlington: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mundava, M., & Chaudhuri, J. (2007). Understanding plagiarism: The role of librarians at the University of Tennessee in assisting student to practice fair use of information. College and Research Libraries News, 68, 170–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Society for Professional Engineers. (2014). NSPE code of ethics for engineers. Retrieved from http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics

  • Newstead, S. E., Frankly-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okagaki, L. (2001). Triarchic model of minority children’s school acheivement. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oz, E. (1993). Ethical standards for computer professionals: A comparative analysis of four major codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(9), 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and the doctorate. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic secondlanguage writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A. W. (2005). Teaching biochemistry at a minority-serving institution: An evaluation of the role of collaborative learning as a tool for science mastery. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (2012). Field of degree and earnings by selected employment characteristics: 2011. Washington, D.C: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Study Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schab, F. (1991). Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence, 26, 839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (1999). Why professors don’t do more to stop students who cheat. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, L. K., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The effects of work-group size and organizational climate. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, H. M., Kuthy, R. A., & Heller, K. E. (2005). Ethical dilemmas reported by fourth year dental students. Journal of Dental Education, 69, 1116–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, J., Markham, S., & Dick, M. (2003). Investigating differences in cheating behaviours of IT undergraduate and graduate students: The maturity and motivation factors. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. (1992). Your own thoughts in your own words. English Language Teaching Journal, 46(2), 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar, M. F., Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Miller, R. L., Mitcham, C., Olds, B. M., Pinkus, R. L., Wolfe, H. (2003). Assessing engineering students’ abilities to resolve ethical dilemmas. Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. A. (2001). The student-instructor relationship’s effect on academic integrity. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, K. D. (1999). A survey of ethics-related instruction in the U.S. engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 459–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stodolsky, S. S., Salk, S., & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student views about learning math and social studies. American Educational Research Association, 28(1), 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 100(3), 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swazey, J., Anderson, M., Louis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist. Retrieved from http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/num2/ethical-problems-in-academic-research/1

  • Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2009). Faculty and peer influences on academic integrity: College cheating in Romania. Higher Education, 57, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. D. (2001). Informal student-faculty interaction: Its relationship to educational gains in science and mathematics among community college students. Community College Review, 29(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. P., & Beemsterboer, P. L. (2003). Enhancing academic integrity: Formulating effective honor codes. Journal of Dental Education, 67(10), 1122–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney, J. (1996). Public understanding of science. Lancet, 347(9008), 1087–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajda-Johnson, V. A., Handal, P. J., Brawer, P. A., & Fabricatore, A. N. (2001). Academic dishonesty at the graduate level. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., & Segade, G. (1999). University support for second-language writers across the curriculum. In L. Harklau, K. M. Losey, & M. Siegal (Eds.), Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S.-educated learners of ESL (pp. 191–209). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • YouGov (2013, December 6–7). No Title. Retrieved from http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/tabs_HP_science_20131209.pdf

  • Zandvoort, H., Van De Poel, I., & Brumsen, M. (2000). Ethics in the engineering curricula: Topics, trends and challenges for the future. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charleston County School District, 63 Reid St. Unit A, Charleston, SC, 29403, USA

    Joanna Gilmore

  2. School of Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas, MO, USA

    Michelle Maher

  3. Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, 6720 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84321, USA

    David Feldon

Authors
  1. Joanna Gilmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelle Maher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Feldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Gilmore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, School of Management, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Tracey Bretag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gilmore, J., Maher, M., Feldon, D. (2016). Prevalence, Prevention, and Pedagogical Techniques: Academic Integrity and Ethical Professional Practice Among STEM Students. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation