Skip to main content

Comparison of COVID-19 Control Policies and Public Health Regimes: The Institutionalism Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Studies on Pandemic Control Policies and the Resilience of Society

Abstract

This chapter, by adopting the institutional perspective, will compare the COVID Monitoring Policies of six different countries and regions, namely, Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR of China, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Denmark. Apart from the legitimacy perspective as core underpinning ideas, this chapter will also examine how institutional theory interplays with the government’s policymaking. After reviewing the government policies of these six countries and regions in the early stage of the COVID, three major types of anti-COVID-19 control policies are identified, that is, “Dynamic zero-clearing”, “Living with COVID” and Mitigation policies. The last part of the chapter then discusses on the linkages of choices of a specific policy with the welfare/health ideologies and regime, economic considerations, and the governance of the state as well as citizen participation and engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “four early measures” refer to as early as possible detection of infected cases and timely reporting of the outbreak to the government, as well as the isolation of infected persons at the early stage of infection and timely and targeted treatment, as proposed by the Chinese government in the “Chinese Action to Combat the New Coronary Pneumonia Epidemic”.

  2. 2.

    The “social distancing measures” was first proposed in a press release by the Hong Kong SAR Government. It refers to the government’s efforts to reduce the number of people gathering and maintain social distancing through the Prevention and Control of Disease Regulation by limiting the number of people gathering, controlling meal times, and closing some entertainment venues.

  3. 3.

    The “universal Community Testing Program” is an initiative of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, with the support of the Chinese government, to provide free testing for the new coronavirus to all citizens of Hong Kong in order to locate the infected and break the chain of transmission. The program is based on the community setting up sampling sites where people can go to their community sampling sites and wait for the test results at home.

  4. 4.

    The “COVID-19 Vaccination Program” is a Hong Kong Government program covering all Hong Kong citizens. The program provides free vaccination against the new crown to protect public health and enable the community to resume normal operations gradually under the epidemic.

  5. 5.

    It is found that Singapore have changed the policy of “Zero COVID” to “Living with COVID” as announced by their prime minister in in March 2022 in a nationally televised address titled “Into a New Phase”, such changes will be examined in the following chapter.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kam Tong Chan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chan, K.T., Yi, X., Yang, X. (2023). Comparison of COVID-19 Control Policies and Public Health Regimes: The Institutionalism Perspective. In: Zhao, S.X.B., Chan, K.T., Çolakoğlu, S., Zhang, Q., Yan, B. (eds) Comparative Studies on Pandemic Control Policies and the Resilience of Society. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9993-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9993-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9992-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9993-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics