Skip to main content

Prostate Cancer Risk Analysis Using Artificial Neural Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing: Theories and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 627))

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

This research developed an expert system based on the neural network to analyze prostate cancer risk. This model does not diagnose prostate cancer but helps a medical practitioner avoid unnecessary biopsies. An artificial neural network is created using the data from 119 patients with four attributes of prostate cancer (PSA, % free PSA, prostate volume, and age) as input parameters, and biopsy results are used as outputs. Outputs are divided into two classes positive and negative. The 70% data is used for training the network, and 30% is used for validation and testing. The results are demonstrated by confusion matrix and ROC curve. The suggested approach yielded an accuracy of 72.2%, which is higher than other existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aljović A, Badnjević A, Gurbeta L (2016) Artificial neural networks in the discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease using biomarkers data. In: 2016 5th Mediterranean conference on embedded computing (MECO). IEEE, pp 286–289

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee J-H, Kim D-H, Jeong S-N, Choi S-H (2018) Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. J Dent 77:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira LAM, Rodrigues D, Ribeiro PB, Papa JP, Weber SAT (2014) Social-spider optimization-based artificial neural networks training and its applications for Parkinson’s disease identification. In: 2014 IEEE 27th international symposium on computer-based medical systems. IEEE, pp 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta KK, Vijay R, Pahadiya P (2020) A review paper on feature selection techniques and artificial neural networks architectures used in thermography for early stage detection of breast cancer. Soft Comput Theor Appl 455–465

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hakkoum H, Idri A, Abnane I (2021) Assessing and comparing interpretability techniques for artificial neural networks breast cancer classification. In: Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering: imaging and visualization, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalbande DR, Khopkar U, Sharma A, Daftary N, Kokate Y, Dmello R (2020) Early stage detection of psoriasis using artificial intelligence and image processing. In: Soft computing: theories and applications. Springer, pp 1199–1208

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ajam N (2015) Heart diseases diagnoses using artificial neural network. IISTE Netw Complex Syst 5(4)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chung C-C, Chiu W-T, Huang Y-H, Chan L, Hong C-T, Chiu H-W (2021) Identifying prognostic factors and developing accurate outcome predictions for in-hospital cardiac arrest by using artificial neural networks. J Neurol Sci 425:117445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prashant M, Krishnan S, Meesha C, Priyanka D, Lakshminarayana SK, Stephen S, Vinodh N, Anish J, Sandeep N, Selvaraj RF et al (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020: report from national cancer registry programme, India. JCO Glob Oncol 6:1063–1075

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benecchi L (2006) Neuro-fuzzy system for prostate cancer diagnosis. Urology 68(2):357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barlow H, Mao S, Khushi M (2019) Predicting high-risk prostate cancer using machine learning methods. Data 4(3):129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saritas I, Ozkan IA, Sert IU (2010) Prognosis of prostate cancer by artificial neural networks. Exp Syst Appl 37(9):6646–6650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srivenkatesh M (2020) Prediction of prostate cancer using machine learning algorithms. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8:5353–5362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsao C-W, Liu C-Y, Cha T-L, Sheng-Tang W, Sun G-H, Dah-Shyong Yu, Chen H-I, Chang S-Y, Chen S-C, Hsu C-Y (2014) Artificial neural network for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in a Taiwanese population. J Chin Med Assoc 77(10):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seker H, Odetayo MO, Petrovic D, Naguib RNG (2003) A fuzzy logic based-method for prognostic decision making in breast and prostate cancers. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7(2):114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahanta J, Panda S (2020) Fuzzy expert system for prediction of prostate cancer. New Math Nat Comput 16(01):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 58(6):843–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mesrabadi HA, Faez K (2018) Improving early prostate cancer diagnosis by using artificial neural networks and deep learning. In: 2018 4th Iranian conference on signal processing and intelligent systems (ICSPIS). IEEE, pp 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  19. Erdem E, Bozkurt F (2021) A comparison of various supervised machine learning techniques for prostate cancer prediction. Avrupa Bilim Teknol Derg 21:610–620

    Google Scholar 

  20. Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (1994) Neural network toolbox. Mathworks

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saritas I, Allahverdi N, Sert IU (2013) A fuzzy approach for determination of prostate cancer. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng 1(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YM, Park S, Kim J, Park S, Lee JH, Ryu DS, Choi SH, Cheon SH (2013) Role of prostate volume in the early detection of prostate cancer in a cohort with slowly increasing prostate specific antigen. Yonsei Med J 54(5):1202–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6(4):525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Patel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Patel, A., Jana, S., Mahanta, J. (2023). Prostate Cancer Risk Analysis Using Artificial Neural Network. In: Kumar, R., Verma, A.K., Sharma, T.K., Verma, O.P., Sharma, S. (eds) Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 627. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9858-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics