Abstract
The notion of thermal comfort has evolved through time, being the answer to various changes and influences in the built environment. Despite the common engineering definition, with measured ideal conditions matching with a state of neutrality, the concept is far more complex and requires a holistic multidisciplinary approach. Two main aspects are pivotal in the concept of comfort: expectation and adaptation, which depend themselves on several diversity-driving factors. However, their influence is nowadays generally neglected in buildings’ design and operation, and standards. The aim of this work is to understand and acknowledge, by means of a literature analysis, the different aspects that contribute to the inner workings of thermal comfort expectations and adaptation. The paper addresses all the different dynamics constituting the users’ thermal background and their attitudes towards the indoor environment. Only an in deep understanding of the possible differences between different users’ expectation and adaptation mechanisms will trigger an informed human-centric design process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amin R, Teli D, James P, Bourikas L (2016) The influence of a student’s ‘home’ climate on room temperature and indoor environmental controls use in a modern halls of residence. Energy Build 119:331–339
ANSI/ASHRAE (2017) Standard 55: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta
Bauman F, Carter T, Baughman A, Arens E (1998) Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings. ASHRAE Trans 104
Brager G, de Dear R (2003) Historical and cultural influences on comfort expectations. In: Cole RJ, Lorch R (eds) Buildings, culture and environment: informing local and global practices. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 177–201
Brager G, Paliaga G, de Dear R (2004) Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort
de Dear R, Brager G (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans 104:145–167
de Dear R, Brager G (2002) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Build 34:549–561
Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, p 244
Hill LD, Webb LH, Parsons KC (2000) Carers’ views of the thermal comfort requirements of people with physical disabilities. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting
Indraganti M, Rao KD (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energy Build 42:273–281
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5:193–206
Karjalainen S (2012) Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air 22:96–109
Li Y, Rezgui Y, Guerriero A, Zhang X, Han M, Kubicki S, Yan D (2020) Development of an adaptation table to enhance the accuracy of the predicted mean vote model. Build Environ 168
Luo M, Cao B, Damiens J, Lin B, Zhu Y (2015) Evaluating thermal comfort in mixed-mode buildings: a field study in a subtropical climate. Build Environ 88:46–54
Luo M, Cao B, Ji W, Ouyang Q, Lin B, Zhu Y (2016a) The underlying linkage between personal control and thermal comfort: psychological or physical effects? Energy Build 111:56–63
Luo M, de Dear R, Ji W, Bin C, Lin B, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y (2016b) The dynamics of thermal comfort expectations: the problem, challenge and impication. Build Environ 95:322–329
Luo M, Zhou X, Zhu Y, Zhang D, Cao B (2016c) Exploring the dynamic process of human thermal adaptation: a study in teaching building. Energy Build 127:425–432
Luo M, Wang Z, Brager, G, Cao B, Zhu Y (2018) Indoor climate experience, migration, and thermal comfort expectation in buildings. Build Environ 141:262–272
Luo M, Ke Z, Ji W, Wang Z, Cao B, Zhou X, Zhu Y (2019) The time-scale of thermal comfort adaptation in heated and unheated buildings. Build Environ 151:175–186
Marín-Restrepo L, Trebilcock M, Porras-Salazar JA (2020) Adaptation by coexistence: contrasting thermal comfort perception among individual and shared office spaces. Archit Sci Rev 63:235–247
Moezzi M (2009) Are comfort expectations of building occupants too high? Build Res Inform 37:79–83
Nicol JF, Humphreys M (1973) Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. Build Res Pract 6:191–197
Parsons K (2002) The effects of gender, acclimation state, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort. Energy Build 34:593–599
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [Online]. Available: prisma-statement.org
Prins G (1992) On condis and coolth. Energy Build 18:251–258
Rudofsky B (1964) Architecture without architects: a short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. Doubleday
Rybczynski W (1986) Home: a short history of an idea. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Satish B (2019) Beyond energy-efficient built environment—examining the relationship between the users’ cultural values and energy consumption. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci
“Scopus Preview,” [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/.
Taylor NAS, Allsopp NK, Parkes DG (1995) Preferred room temperature of young vs aged males: the influence of thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and affect. J Gerontol Ser A 50A:M216–M221
Teli D, Jentsch MF, James PAB, Bahaj AS (2012) Field study on thermal comfort in a UK primary school. In: Proceedings of 7th Windsor conference: the changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world. Windsor, UK
van Hoof J, Hensen J (2006) Thermal comfort and older adults. Gerontechnology 4:223–228
van Hoof J, Schellen L, Soebarto V, Wong JKW, Kazak JK (2017) Ten questions concerning thermal comfort and ageing. Build Environ 120:123–133
Vischer JC (2008) Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Build Res Inform 36(3):231–240
Watson KJ, Evans J, Karvonen A, Whitley T (2016) Re-conceiving building design quality: a review of building users in their social context. Indoor Built Environ 35(3):509–523
Wilhite H, Shove E, Kempton W (2000) The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management. We know more about individual behavior but next to nothing about demand. In: Jochem E, Sathaye JA, Bouille D (eds) Society, behaviour and climate change mitigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
Yoshino H, Hong T, Nord N (2017) IEA EBC annex 53: total energy use in buildings—analysis and evaluation methods. Energy Build 152:124–136
Yu J, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y, Shen H, Cao G, Cui W (2012) A comparison of the thermal adaptability of people accustomed to air-conditioned environments and naturally ventilated environments. Indoor Air 22:110–118
Yun H, Nam I, Kim J, Yang J, Lee K, Sohn J (2014) A field study of thermal comfort for kindergarten children in Korea: an assessment of existing models and preferences of children. Build Environ 75:182–189
Zhang F, de Dear R (2019) Impacts of demographic, contextual and interaction effects on thermal sensation—evidence from a global database. Build Environ 162
Zhou X, Ouyang Q, Zhu Y, Feng C, Zhang X (2013) Experimental study of the influence of anticipated control on human thermal sensation and thermal comfort. Indoor Air 24
Acknowledgements
This work has been conducted within the EU H2020 Cultural-E project funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N. 870072.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pistore, L., Pasut, W. (2023). Roots and Mechanisms of Thermal Comfort Expectations: From Individuals’ Own Background to Adaptation and Change. In: Wang, L.L., et al. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Building Energy and Environment. COBEE 2022. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9822-5_251
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9822-5_251
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9821-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9822-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)