Skip to main content

Tourism Visitors, Pilgrimage and Contested Spaces: Community, Heritage, Ecology and Perception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Host Communities and Pilgrimage Tourism

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Asian Tourism ((PAT))

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

Tourism and pilgrimage in the twenty-first century have evolved as major drivers of local, regional, and even national economies. Indeed, pilgrimage has long been an important social and economic facet of many communities. Nevertheless, need and desire for pilgrimage generates multi-layered issues of contested spaces and competing uses between different religious persuasions and secular communities. Such issues have occurred throughout the history of pilgrimage and tourism, triggering political and other conflicts. This chapter addresses specific issues of modern tourism, leisure, and pilgrimage with English case-studies and reference to stakeholder perceptions of pagans and non-pagans today.

Perceptions and attitudes are significant forces raising difficult issues when mainstream, mass tourism and outdoor recreation impact on pagan sites and landscapes. When perceived sacred sites become landscapes for outdoor sporting activities, there are potential conflicts. In English National Parks, originally designated in the 1940s and 1950s, priorities were quiet recreation and conservation. However, increasing demand for outdoor active leisure and mass tourism, and regional economic benefits, means a change in basic assumptions. This generates issues of site and space ‘ownership’. Whilst traditional mainstream locations, e.g., medieval Christian churches, are recognised as places of quiet reverence, pagan landscape-based religious sites are not. Additional conflict occurs in now recreational landscapes between secular spiritual visitors to ‘wild’ sites seeking nature-therapy through solitude, and mass tourism or active sports. With National Park management increasingly driven by potential economic impacts, decision-makers overlook these issues and less mainstream stakeholders like modern-day pagans and those seeking spiritual experiences in nature. For pilgrimage and wider tourism, the study triggers questions of whose religion, heritage, landscape, and benefit. Long-term action research in English National Parks and other protected areas suggests these are rarely addressed by mainstream conservation of nature and heritage, by tourism managers, or regional planners.

The chapter reviews issues, long-term observations, and action research with stakeholders, with reference to detailed case-studies and stakeholder feedback to consider paradigms. Specific questions are (1) of ‘ownership’ of space and nature as sacred sites in National Parks and other protected areas in England; (2) of attitudes and connection to nature and landscape by pagan and non-pagan communities; (3) the degree to which connection to nature in English National Parks represents spiritual experience; and (4) how pagan stakeholders in English National Parks represent an invisible community. It is argued that mass tourism destinations, National Parks, and other protected areas creates contested spaces between multiple stakeholder groups with these spiritual landscapes overlooked by managers and decision-makers. The issues and findings are transferrable to other geographical and social settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, C., Macleod, N. E., & Shaw, S. (2000). Leisure and tourism landscapes. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. A. (2008). Management planning for nature conservation: A theoretical basis and practical guide. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. A. (2010). Guide to management planning. CMS Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2009). Peak District landscape character assessment. 8. The eastern moors landscape strategy and action plan. Peak District National Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2010). Sheffield’s great outdoors green & open space strategy 2010–2030. Parks and Countryside, Sheffield City Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2012). Conservation plan guidance. Heritage Lottery Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2013). Sheffield moors masterplan 2013–2028 revised draftv2 making connections. A landscape scale vision for the Sheffield moors. Sheffield Moors Partnership, Peak District National Park Authority & partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (n.d.-a). Action for habitats. Eastern moors partnership: Peak District National Park. https://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/looking-after/biodiversity/action-for-wildlife/action-for-habitats. Accessed Feb 2021.

  • Anon. (n.d.-b). Landscape strategy. https://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/looking-after/strategies-and-policies/landscape-strategy. Accessed Feb 2021.

  • Anon. (n.d.-c). World religions or belief systems by number of adherents. http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html. Accessed May 2017.

  • Anon. (n.d.-d). Forest school association/What is forest school. https://www.forestschoolassociation.org/. Accessed May 2021.

  • Arvay, C. G. (2018). The biophilia effect: The healing bond between humans and nature: A scientific and spiritual exploration of the healing bond between humans and nature. Sounds True.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnatt, J. (1997). Excavation and restoration of the Doll Tor stone circle, Stanton, Derbyshire, 1994. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal, 117, 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., Egan, D., & Rotherham, I. D. (2000). The changing role of outdoor leisure: a critical review of countryside tourism. In M. Robinson, J. Swarbrooke, N. Evans, P. Long & R. Sharpley (eds.). Reflections on international tourism. Environmental management and pathways to sustainable tourism. Centre for travel and tourism (pp. 1–19). University of Northumbria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., Swarbrooke, J., Leckie, S., & Pomfret, G. (2003). Adventure tourism: The new frontier. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K., & Phillips, A. (Eds.). (2004). Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation. Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, J., & Wallis, R. J. (2004a). Sacred sites, contested rites/rights: Contemporary pagan engagements with the past. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blain, J., & Wallis, R.J. (2004b). Comments on Stanton moor with respect to lees cross and Endcliffe quarrying proposals: Landscape, spiritual meanings and pagan objections to proposals. Unpublished comments submitted to Peak District National Park Authority, 4 March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, J., & Wallis, R. J. (2004c). Draft outline proposal for ethnographic work within the Peak District National Park: Spiritual dimensions of the park and implications for recognising and developing spiritual tourism. Unpublished draft proposal for submission to PDNPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, J., & Wallis, R. (2007). Sacred sites. Contested rites/rights. Pagan engagements with archaeological monuments. Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, J., Exzzy, D., & Harvey, G. (Eds.). (2004). Researching paganisms. Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, R. (1998). Divine landscapes. A pilgrimage through Britain’s sacred places. Canterbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonewits, I. (2007). Defining paganism: Paleo-, meso-, and neo-. http://www.neopagan.net/PaganDefs.html. Accessed May 2017.

  • Butler, S., & Comley, V. (2014). Reconomics: The economic impact of outdoor recreation in the UK. Liverpool John Moores University/Sport and Recreation Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. (1997). Carrying capacity. UNEP Industry and Environment 8. UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (Ed.). (1999). Conservation plans in action: Proceedings of the Oxford conference. Published English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., & Mount, D. (1998). Management planning: A guide. The Countryside Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coccossis, H., Mexa, A., & Collovini, A. (2002). Defining, measuring and evaluating carrying capacity in European tourism destinations. University of the Aegean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croney, M. (2007). Eastern moors estate – PDNPA objectives. Peak District National Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, S. (2021). The potential for the UK’s National Parks to be utilised as a resource for the nation’s mental health and wellbeing. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, A. R., Vaske, J. J., & Kuss, F. R. (1984). Social carrying capacity: An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), 395–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, A. R., Kuss, F. R., & Vaske, J. J. (1990). Visitor impact management: The planning framework. National Parks and Conservation Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M., Davies, L., Kokolakakis, Y., & Barrett, D. (2014). Everything grows outside – including jobs and the economy: Valuing the contribution of the outdoor economy in Sheffield: Summary report. Sports Industry Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (Ed.). (2000). Indigenous religions. A companion. Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (2004). Pagan studies or the study of paganisms? A case study in the study of religions. In J. Blain, D. Exzzy, & G. Harvey (Eds.), Researching paganisms (pp. 241–255). Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnells, J. R. (Ed.). (1984). Dictionary of religions. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden, D. (2005). The destruction of Mecca: Saudi hardliners are wiping out their own heritage. The independent, 6th August.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS-UK. (2000). To be a pilgrim. Meeting the needs of visitors to cathedrals and churches in the United Kingdom. ICOMOS-UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. (2006). The curse of Stonehenge will remain until it is handed back to the druids. The Guardian, 27th January, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., & Pennick, N. (1997). A history of pagan Europe. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, N. J. (2020). Pagan pathways to nature connectedness: An exploration of the human-nature relationship. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. E. (2002). How much is too much? Carrying capacity of National Parks and protected areas. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas conference proceedings (pp. 306–313). Bodenkultur University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, K. (2017). Managing recreational impacts in the uplands and great outdoors. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S. F. (2013). Limits of acceptable change and tourism. In A. Holden & D. A. Fennel (Eds.), Routledge handbook of tourism and the environment (pp. 285–298). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., & Smith, K. (2007). Stanton moor conservation plan 2007. Peak National Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, V. C., & Hawkins, R. (1998). Sustainable tourism: A marketing perspective. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Shultz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M., & Palmer, N. (1997). Sacred Britain: A guide to the sacred sites and pilgrim routes of England. Scotland & Wales. Judy Piakus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggott, S. (1985). William Stukeley: An eighteenth-century antiquary (Revised edition). Thames & Hudson Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plevin, J. (2019). The healing magic of Forest bathing: Finding calm, creativity, and connection in the natural world. Ten Speed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pungetti, G., Oviedo, G., & Hooke, D. (2012). Sacred species and sites. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, D. (1977). A nature conservation review. Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2007). Sacred sites and the tourist: Sustaining tourism infrastructures for religious tourists and pilgrims. In R. Raj & N. D. Morpeth (Eds.), Religious tourism and pilgrimage festivals management: An international perspective (pp. 64–77). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2013). Emerging concepts and case studies of eco-cultural tourism. In K. Griffin, N. D. Morpeth, & R. Raj (Eds.), Cultural Tourism (pp. 74–89). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2014). Eco-History: A Short History of Conservation and Biodiversity. The White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2015a). Sacred sites and the tourist: Sustaining tourism infrastructures for religious tourists and pilgrims – A UK perspective. In R. Raj & K. Griffin (Eds.), Religious tourism and pilgrimage management: An international perspective (2nd ed., pp. 37–56). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2015b). The rise and fall of countryside management. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham I. D. (2017). Champions of grassroots conservation: A future for local authority countryside services? ECOS, 38(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D. (2019). Issues and approaches in managing visitors to pagan sacred sites. In M. Griffiths & P. Wiltshier (Eds.), Managing religious tourism (pp. 92–111). CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotherham, I. D., & Mayor, K. (2019). Challenges for managing access in the great outdoors. Ranger, Spring 2019, 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (1998). Kakadu National Park (Australia). A site of natural and heritage significance. In M. Shackley (Ed.), Visitor management. Case studies from world heritage sites (pp. 121–138). Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, W. (2014). Has english heritage ruined stonehenge? The guardian review, Saturday 21st June 2014, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, M. (Ed.). (1998). Visitor management. Case studies from world heritage sites. Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, M. (2003). Managing sacred sites (2nd ed.). Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, P. (2012). Exmoor dreaming. In G. Pungetti, G. Oviedo, & D. Hooke (Eds.), Sacred species and sites. Advances in biocultural conservation (pp. 111–123). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. H. (1984). A conceptual framework for carrying capacity determination. Leisure Science, 6(4), 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Oregon State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway, R. (1995). Outdoor recreation and nature conservation: Conflicts and their resolution. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway, R. (2005). Resolving environmental disputes: From conflict to consensus. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal, and application. Leisure Science, 6(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., & McCool, S. F. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal and application. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., & McCool, S. F. (1991). Recreation use limits: The wildland manager’s continuing dilemma. Western Wildlands, 16(4), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., McCool, S. F., & Stokes, G. L. (1984). Limits of acceptable change: A new framework for managing the bob Marshall wilderness. Western Wildlands, 10(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stausberg, M. (2011). Religion and tourism: Crossroads, destinations and encounters. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2016). The Spirit of rewilding: Steps toward a shamanic ecology. Ethos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresidder, R. (1999). Tourism and sacred landscapes. In D. Crouch (Ed.), Leisure/tourism geographies (pp. 137–163). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, R. J. (2003). Shamans/Neo-Shamans. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, S. C. (2003, April 24–27). Faith and tourism: accommodating visitor and worshipper in the historic city. In 6th US/ICOMOS international symposium, ‘managing conflict and conservation in historic cities’, 24–27 April 2003, Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Anonymous referees and the editors are thanked for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian D. Rotherham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rotherham, I.D. (2023). Tourism Visitors, Pilgrimage and Contested Spaces: Community, Heritage, Ecology and Perception. In: Progano, R.N., Cheer, J.M., Santos, X.M. (eds) Host Communities and Pilgrimage Tourism. Perspectives on Asian Tourism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9677-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics