Abstract
This chapter seeks to constitute a roadmap or framework to guide business researchers in contextualizing and planning their research efforts. A literature study was conducted to investigate the research concept, the boundary of research, and the research process’ conceptual framework. This chapter summarized research as a systematic investigation to reveal new knowledge. In guiding industry-orientated business research, it is acknowledged that management action may solve some business problems. In contrast, higher levels of organizational issues and critical reflection of business issues may require actual research.
The framework for business research is divided into four parts: the research problem, research design, empirical evidence, and conclusion. The central part of the map is the design section that organizes the philosophic approach (theoretical foundation, research philosophy, and assumptions) on the one side and the applied research methods and techniques on the other side, with the research methodology acting as a bridge between the sides. The framework constitutes a guide when embarking on the journey to solve industry-orientated business research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
AS illustrated later, it must be noted not every business problem needs to be solved by scientific research.
- 2.
Note that although conceptually four distinct elements, in actuality these ProDEC elements are highly integrated.
- 3.
Note that the theoretical foundation may not be of equal importance in all paradigms, e.g., the pragmatist and design sciences paradigms where a pragmatic problem solution or artifact is the primary objective.
References
Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 237–258.
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research. Thomson/ Wadsworth.
Brierley, J. A. (2017). The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 6(2), 140–154.
Collins. (2021). Definition of research. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/research Date of access: 21 July 2021.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Sage.
Davis, C., & Fisher, M. (2018). Understanding Research Paradigms. JARNA, 21(3), 21–25.
Delen, D., & Zolbanin, H. M. (2018). The analytics paradigm in business research. Journal of Business Research, 90, 186–195.
Department of Education and Training, Western Sydney University. 2020. Research services. https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/research/researchers/preparing_a_grant_application/dest_definition_of_research. Date of access: 21 July 2021.
Elsayed, N., & Elbardan, H. (2018). Investigating the associations between executive compensation and firm performance: Agency theory or tournament theory. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 245–270.
FindAPhD.com. (2021). What are the criteria for a PhD? https://www.findaphd.com/advice/finding/criteria-for-phd.aspx Date of access: 18 August 2021.
Goldkuhl, G. (2011). Design research in search for a paradigm: Pragmatism is the answer. European Design Science Symposium (pp. 84–95). Springer.
Goldkuhl, G. (2020). Design Science Epistemology: A pragmatist inquiry. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 39–79.
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Sage.
Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 341–346.
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly: 75–105.
Kessler, E. H. (Ed.). (2013). Encyclopedia of management theory. Sage.
Kankam, P. K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research, 41(2), 85–92.
Kekeya, J. (2019, November). The commonalities and differences between research paradigms. Contemporary PNG Studies: DWU Research Journal, 31, 26–36.
Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 44–53.
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal for Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41.
Jansen, J. D. (2020a). What is a research question and why is it important? In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 2–14.
Jansen, J. D. (2020b). Introduction to the language of research. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 16–24.
Lexico.com. (2021). Oxford English and Spanish dictionary, synonyms, and Spanish to English translator. https://www.lexico.com/definition/research Date of access: 22 July 2021.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Sage.
Myers, M. D. (2020). Qualitative research in business & management. Sage.
Mouton, J. (1996). Understanding social research. Van Schaik.
Mouton, J. (2011). How to succeed in your master’s & doctoral studies: A South African guide and resource book. Van Schaik.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2020). Introducing qualitative research. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 56–76.
Pandey, P. & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center: Buzau.
Pietersen, J. & Maree, K. (2020). Statistical analysis II: Inferential statistics. In: Maree, K., (ed.), First steps in research. Van Schaik. pp. 242–258.
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1000403.
Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(8), 51–59.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. Pearson.
Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.
Tubey, R. J., Rotich, J. K., & Bengat, J. K. (2015). Research paradigms: Theory and practice. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(5), 224–228.
Vom Brocke J., Hevner A., Maedche A. (2020). Introduction to Design Science Research. In: Vom Brocke J., Hevner A., Maedche A. (eds.), Design Science Research. Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1 Date of access: 21 October 2021.
Voxco. (2022). Business research: Definition, types, and methods. https://www.voxco.com/blog/business-research-definition-types-and-methods/ Date of access: 23 May 2022.
Wilson, J. (2013). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project. Sage. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/59838_Wilson_ch1.pdf Date of access: 3 June 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oberholzer, M., Buys, P.W. (2023). A Roadmap to Business Research. In: Buys, P.W., Oberholzer, M. (eds) Business Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9478-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9479-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)