Skip to main content

Intelligent Sepsis Detector Using Vital Signs Through Long Short-Term Memory Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 614))

Abstract

Sepsis has become a primary source of mortality of patients treated in intensive care units. The timely detection of sepsis assists in decreasing the mortality rate, as it becomes difficult to treat the patient if the symptoms get worsen. The primary objective of this work is to early detect sepsis patients by utilizing a deep learning model, and then perform a comparative analysis of the proposed system with other modern techniques to analyze the performance of the proposed model. In this work, we employed the long short-time memory model on the sepsis patient dataset. The three different performance metrics are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed system, i.e., accuracy, specificity, and AUROC. The results were obtained in three different windows after the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, such as 4, 8, and 12 h window sizes. This proposed system achieved accuracy, specificity, and AUROC of 77, 75, and 91%, respectively. The comparison of the proposed system with other state-of-the-art techniques is performed on the basis of the above-mentioned performance metrics, which demonstrated the significance of the proposed system and proved that this system is reliable to implement in real-time environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nemati S et al (2018) An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med 46(4):547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Kang Y, Jia X, Wang J, Xie G (2019) TASP: a time-phased model for sepsis prediction. In: 2019 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delahanty RJ, Alvarez JoAnn, Flynn LM, Sherwin RL, Jones SS (2019) Development and evaluation of a machine learning model for the early identification of patients at risk for sepsis. Ann Emerg Med 73(4):334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reyna M, Shashikumar SP, Moody B, Gu P, Sharma A, Nemati S, Clifford G (2019) Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the PhysioNet/computing in cardiology challenge 2019. In: 2019 computing in cardiology conference (CinC), vol 45, pp 10–13. https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2019.412

  5. Dellinger RP et al (2013) Incidence surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giannini HM et al (2019) A machine learning algorithm to predict severe sepsis and septic shock: development, implementation, and impact on clinical practice. Crit Care Med 47(11):1485–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Mualemi BY, Lu L (2020) A deep learning-based sepsis estimation scheme. IEEE Access 9:5442–5452

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wickramaratne SD, Shaad Mahmud MD (2020) Bi-directional gated recurrent unit based ensemble model for the early detection of sepsis. In: 2020 42nd annual international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine & biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kok C, Jahmunah V, Oh SL, Zhou X, Guruajan R (2020) Automated prediction of sepsis using temporal convolutional network. J Comput Biol Med 127

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, André Ng G, Schlindwein FS (2019) Convolutional and recurrent neural networks for early detection of sepsis using hourly physiological data from patients in intensive care unit. In: 2019 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barton C et al (2019) Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs. Comput Biol Med 109:79–84. https://physionet.org

  12. Biglarbeigi P, McLaughlin D, Rjoob K, Abdullah A, McCallan N, Jasinska-Piadlo A, Bond R et al (2019) Early prediction of sepsis considering early warning scoring systems. In: 2019 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yao J, Ong ML, Mun KK, Liu S, Motani M (2019) Hybrid feature learning using autoencoders for early prediction of sepsis. In: 2019 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eskandari MA, Moridani MK, Mohammadi S (2021) Detection of sepsis patients using biomarkers based on machine learning

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez A, Mendoza D, Ascuntar J, Jaimes F (2021) Supervised classification techniques for prediction of mortality in adult patients with sepsis. Am J Emerg Med 45:392–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen M, Hernández A (2021) Towards an explainable model for Sepsis detection based on sensitivity analysis. IRBM

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chicco D, Oneto L (2021) Data analytics and clinical feature ranking of medical records of patients with sepsis. BioData Mining 14(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvi RH, Rahman MH, Khan AAS, Rahman RM (2020) Deep learning approach on tabular data to predict early-onset neonatal sepsis. J Inf Telecommun 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reyna MA, Josef C, Seyedi S, Jeter R, Shashikumar SP, Brandon Westover M, Sharma A, Nemati S, Clifford GD (2019) Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the PhysioNet/computing in cardiology challenge 2019. In: 2019 computing in cardiology (CinC). IEEE, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kok C, Jahmunah V, Oh SL, Zhou X, Gururajan R, Tao X, Cheong KH, Gururajan R, Molinari F, Rajendra Acharya U (2020) Automated prediction of sepsis using temporal convolutional network. Comput Biol Med 127:103957

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fu J, Li W, Jiao Du, Xiao B (2020) Multimodal medical image fusion via Laplacian pyramid and convolutional neural network reconstruction with local gradient energy strategy. Comput Biol Med 126:104048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baral S, Alsadoon A, Prasad PWC, Al Aloussi S, Alsadoon OH (2021) A novel solution of using deep learning for early prediction cardiac arrest in Sepsis patient: enhanced bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM). Multimed Tools Appl 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rafiei A, Rezaee A, Hajati F, Gheisari S, Golzan M (2021) SSP: early prediction of sepsis using fully connected LSTM-CNN model. Comput Biol Med 128:104110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Steenkiste T, Ruyssinck J, De Baets L, Decruyenaere J, De Turck F, Ongenae F, Dhaene T (2019) Accurate prediction of blood culture outcome in the intensive care unit using long short-term memory neural networks. Artif Intell Med 97:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu X, Liu T, Zhang Z, Kuo P-C, Xu H, Yang Z, Lan K et al (2021) TOP-net prediction model using bidirectional long short-term memory and medical-grade wearable multisensor system for tachycardia onset: algorithm development study. JMIR Med Informatics 9(4):e18803

    Google Scholar 

  26. da Silva DB, Schmidt D, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R, Eskofier B (2021) DeepSigns: a predictive model based on Deep Learning for the early detection of patient health deterioration. Exp Syst Appl 165:113905

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ullah A et al (2022) Comparison of machine learning algorithms for sepsis detection. Sepsis

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qadir G et al (2022) Voice spoofing countermeasure based on spectral features to detect synthetic attacks through LSTM. Int J Innov Sci Technol 3:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dawood H et al (2022) A robust voice spoofing detection system using novel CLS-LBP features and LSTM. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hassan F, Javed A (2021) Voice spoofing countermeasure for synthetic speech detection. In: 2021 international conference on artificial intelligence (ICAI). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar A (2018) ML metrics: sensitivity vs. specificity - dzone ai, dzone.com. [Online]. https://dzone.com/articles/mlmetricssensitivityvsspecificitydifference#:~:text=What%20Is%20Specificity%3F,be%20termed%20as%20false%20positives. Accessed: 13-Mar-2022

  32. How to check the accuracy of your machine learning model, Deepchecks, 09-Feb-2022. [Online]. https://deepchecks.com/how-to-check-the-accuracy-of-your-machine-learning-model/. Accessed 13-Mar-2022

  33. Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, Stanley MD, Clifford GD, Buchman TG (2018) An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med 46(4):547–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shashikumar SP, Stanley MD, Sadiq I, Li Q, Holder A, Clifford GD, Nemati S (2017) Early sepsis detection in critical care patients using multiscale blood pressure and heart rate dynamics. J Electrocardiol 50(6):739–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Auliya Ur Rahman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hassan, F., Rahman, A.U., Mehmood, M.H. (2023). Intelligent Sepsis Detector Using Vital Signs Through Long Short-Term Memory Network. In: Anwar, S., Ullah, A., Rocha, Á., Sousa, M.J. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 614. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9331-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics