Abstract
Technical skills alone can no longer fulfil and adapt to industry and market demands as an economy grows. Enterprises now need a broader skillset than a single professional or technical expertise. This signifies that the company's needs for personnel are technical and soft skills. Soft skills comprise teamwork, critical thinking, and general thinking capabilities (Becerik-Gerber et al. in Handle Proxy, 2006). Methodology: A questionnaire survey was developed and distributed to all the thirty two year-two and three-degree Bachelor of Construction—quantity surveying and construction management programmes in one higher education polytechnic in New Zealand. Findings: This paper shows that students undertaking those interdisciplinary electives reported a significantly stronger development of work-ready skills in the industry. Specifically, interaction with industry, bi-cultural awareness and problem-solving skills were more developed. Originality/value—This study advances our knowledge of the relationship between interdisciplinary education and students' perceptions of their employability. The goal of this study is to increase understanding of interdisciplinary course design and pedagogy and strengthen the connection between learning and work in New Zealand by examining the effectiveness of interdisciplinary learning with a focus on social-cultural aspects in programmes related to construction engineering in New Zealand.
Yin Fang Zheng and Kam Yuen Cheng conducted the research; Yin Fang Zheng and Kam Yuen Cheng wrote the literature review section; Kam Yuen Cheng analysed the data, findings, and conclusion and reviewed the report; all authors approved the final version.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnard, S., Bagilhole, B., Dainty, A., & Hassan, T. (2012). Women in engineering in the UK. In GIVE 2011: Gender and interdisciplinary education for engineers (pp. 65–78). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-982-4_6.
Barnard, S., Hassan, T., Dainty, A., & Bagilhole, B. (2013). Interdisciplinary content, contestations of knowledge and informational transparency in the engineering curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(7), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.836089
Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, & Ku, K. (2006). The pace of technological innovation in architecture, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into the curricula. Handle Proxy. https://hdl.handle.net/10919/92598.
Belich, J. (2002). Making peoples: A history of the New Zealanders from Polynesian settlement to the end of the nineteenth century. University of Hawaii Press.
Bennett, S. T., & Liu, J. H. (2018). Historical trajectories for reclaiming an Indigenous identity in mental health interventions for Aotearoa/New Zealand—Maori values, biculturalism, and multiculturalism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 62, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.05.005
Cook, P. R. (2016). Adding art to STEM. Communications of the ACM, 59(10), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967972
Davis, R. E., Krishnan, S., Nilsson, T. L., & Rimland, P. F. (2014). IDEAS: Interdisciplinary design engineering and service. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5546.
De Hei, M. S. A., Strijbos, J., Sjoer, E., & Admiraal, W. (2015). Collaborative learning in higher education: Lecturers’ practices and beliefs. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 232–247.
Harrison, G. P., Ewen Macpherson, D., & Williams, D. A. (2007). Promoting interdisciplinarity in engineering teaching. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701276775
Herro, D., Quigley, C., Andrews, J., & Delacruz, G. (2017). Co-measure: Developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z.
Holdsworth, S., & Sandri, O. (2021). Investigating undergraduate student learning experiences using the good practice learning and teaching for sustainability education (GPLTSE) framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127532.
Hunter-Doniger, T. (2018). Art infusion: Ideal conditions for STEAM. Art Education, 71(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414534
GrĂĽnzweig, F. E. (2004). Runeninschriften auf Waffen: Inschriften vom 2. Jahrhundert n. Chr. bis ins Hochmittelalter (Vol. 11). Edition Praesens.
Kang, N. (2008). Activation plan for the convergence study of scientific technology & humanities and social sciences. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
Klaassen, R. G. (2018). Interdisciplinary education: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1442417
Lattuca, L., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence for engineers. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21173.
Luxhøsj, J. T., & Hansen, P. H. (1996). Engineering curriculum reform at Aalborg University. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(3), 183–186.
Marcketti, S. B., & Karpova, E. E. (2014). Getting ready for the real world: Student perspectives on bringing industry collaboration into the classroom. Journal of Family and Consumer Science, 104(1), 27–31.
McComas, W. F., & Wang, H. A. (1998). Blended science: The rewards and challenges of integrating the science disciplines for instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 340–348.
Miller, A. (2014a). Designing PBL projects to increase student literacy. In IRA essentials, (pp. 1-11). https://doi.org/10.1598/e-ssentials.8060.
Miller, A. (2014b). PBL and STEAM education: A natural fit. Edutopia. (2014, May 20). https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-and-steam-natural-fit-andrew-miller.
Newell, W. H. (Ed.). (1998). Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. College Board.
Nunnally, B., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory. Oxford University.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications.
Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. SAGE.
Richter, D. M., & Paretti, M. C. (2009). Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802710185
Robinson, E. (1990). The engineers: A history of the engineering profession in Britain, 1750–1914. By R. A. Buchanan (pp. 240. £25). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700036743. (The Journal of Economic History, 50(2), 470–471).
Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative Autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+the arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20112
Spinks, N., Silburn, N. L., & Birchall, D. W. (2007). Making it all work: The engineering graduate of the future, a UK perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701278573
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Stember, M. (1991). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal, 28(1), 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, K.Y., Zheng, Y.F. (2023). Students' Perceptions of Employability Towards Interdisciplinary Education in the Construction Engineering Programme in New Zealand. In: Hong, C., Ma, W.W.K. (eds) Applied Degree Education and the Shape of Things to Come. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9314-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9315-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)