Abstract
Little research has been done to examine the development of thinking skills in the context of second language learning and teaching. This article reports the results of a study that assesses the effectiveness of a Philosophy in Schools (PIS) programme in developing English as a Second Language (ESL) students’ thinking skills in Hong Kong. In the study, training and support were provided for two English teachers to enable them to teach PIS to their Secondary 4 ESL students during English lessons. The students were found to be capable of reasoning and arguing about philosophical problems arising from various stimuli prepared by their teachers according to the English curriculum. Also, PIS was found to play an important role in promoting the students’ critical and creative thinking. The findings of this study suggest that integrating philosophy into the English curriculum can promote critical and creative thinking in ESL students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Curriculum Development Council. (2017). English language education: Key learning area curriculum guide (Primary 1—Secondary 6). Hong Kong, China: Author.
Daniel, M.-F., & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy, critical thinking and Philosophy for Children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415–435.
Edgar, D. W., Faulkner, P., Franklin, E., Knobloch, N. A., & Morgan, A. C. (2008). Creative thinking: Opening up a world of thought. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 83 (4), 46–49.
Education Bureau. (n.d.). QA inspection annual report 2009/10. Retrieved July 31, 2013, from, http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/sch-admin/sch-quality-assurance/reports/insp-annual-reports/index.html
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W. H. Freeman and Company.
Fisher, R. (2001). Philosophy in primary schools: Fostering thinking skills and literacy. Reading, 35(2), 67–73.
Hand, M., & Winstanley, C. (2008). Introduction. In M. Hand & C. Winstanley (Eds.), Philosophy in schools (pp. x–xviii). London: Continuum.
Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children. (1987). Philosophy for Children 1987. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 7 (1), S1–S24.
Lam, C. M. (2013). Childhood, philosophy and open society: Implications for education in Confucian heritage cultures. Springer.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Temple University Press.
Mok, J. (2009). From policies to realities: Developing students’ critical thinking in Hong Kong secondary school English writing classes. RELC Journal, 40(3), 262–279.
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764.
O’Riordan, N. (2013). Swimming against the tide: The implementation of Philosophy for Children in the primary classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull.
Proctor, R. M. J., & Burnett, P. C. (2004). Measuring cognitive and dispositional characteristics of creativity in elementary students. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 421–429.
Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456.
Society for the Advancement of Philosophical Enquiry and Reflection in Education. (2015). SAPERE handbook to accompany the Level 1 P4C Foundation Course (4th ed.). Author.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for Children’: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.
United Nations Educational, & Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2007). Philosophy: A school of freedom. Author.
Winstanley, C. (2008). Philosophy and the development of critical thinking. In M. Hand & C. Winstanley (Eds.), Philosophy in schools (pp. 85–95). Continuum.
Xie, X. (2010). Why are students quiet? Looking at the Chinese context and beyond. ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal, 64(1), 10–20.
Acknowledgements
This chapter is based on work funded by the Quality Education Fund (Project Number: 2014/0080) in Hong Kong. I thank my co-investigators Bob Adamson and Laurance Splitter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lam, CM. (2023). Education for the Future: Cultivating Thinking Through Thinking About Thinking. In: Hong, C., Ma, W.W.K. (eds) Applied Degree Education and the Shape of Things to Come. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9314-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9315-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)