Abstract
Research Aim and Object: Building on 15 years of engineering education into all aspects of the student journey, pedagogy and practice as well as educational management research, this chapter primarily discusses the methodological steps involved undertaking a critical evaluation of applied degree education. Methodology: Drawing upon the findings of a qualitative evaluation conducted with forty-eight colleagues from one of the UK’s largest Engineering Education Faculties, a unique phenomenological approach to collecting data is introduced in which an ‘interactive SWOT analysis’ was used to guide the interview discussion and so enable to the focus to shift to ‘the shape of things to come.’ Key Results: The brief overview of findings focuses on one emergent theme, colleagues’ reflections of the positive aspects of learning and teaching within an organisation whereby applied learning is universally adopted. In doing so, the chapter provides a distinctive insight into the breadth and depth of the uniqueness of one of the UK’s largest faculties of applied engineering education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, S. (2022). Extent of Engineering Skills Crisis Revealed.’ The HR Director. https://www.thehrdirector.com/business-news/employment/extent-engineering-skills-crisis-revealed/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20current%20shortage%20is%20influenced,engineers%20instead%20of%20training%20graduates. Accessed 12 September 22
Ayres, L., Kavanaugh, K., & Knafl, K. A. (2003). Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 871–883.
Belfield, B., Britton, C., Dearden, J., & Van Der Erve, L. (2017). Higher Education Funding in England: Past, Present and Options for The Future. London. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Briefing Note Bn211. https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/bn211.pdf Accessed 25 July 22
Broo, D. G., Kaynak, O., & Sait, S. M. (2022). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. Journal Of Industrial Information Integration, 25, 100311.
Brown, S., & Wareing, S. (2016). Academic development & management. Advancing Practice in Academic Development, pp. 282–296.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Cable, V. (2015). “Foreword”. The State of Engineering in the UK. London. Engineering UK, p. 1.
Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–27.
Carter-Black, J. (2008). A black woman’s journey into a predominately white academic world. Affilia, 23(2), 112–122.
Clark, R., & Andrews, J. (2010). “A bridge too far? Breaching the research/learning and teaching nexus in a previously research-led university. In C. Rust (ed). Improving student learning for the twenty first century learner. 2. Pp. 10–21, Oxford. Oxford Brookes University Publications.
Clark, R., & Andrews, J. ( 2017). Engineering or the engineer? A paradox of practice. In new approaches to engineering in higher education. London. Institute of engineering & technology. Engineering professors council. http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/new-approaches-conference-proceedings-book-final.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
European Commission. (2021). Towards a sustainable, humancentric and resilient European industry. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/468a892a-5097-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1/. Accessed 6 June 22
Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., & Gajdzik, B. (2022). Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics, 1–28.
IET. (2022). IET skills and demand in industry survey. London. Institute of Engineering and Technology. https://www.theiet.org/media/9234/2021-skills-survey.pdf. Accessed 12 September 22.
Jick, T. D. (1993). Managing change & concepts. Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard University Publications.
Kotter, J. P. (2008). Transformation. Leadership Excellence, 21(1), 14.
NAE. (2017). Grand challenges for engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/ National Academy for Engineering. Washington.
Norton, L. (2009). Action research in teaching & learning. Routledge.
Perkins, J. (2013). Review of engineering skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254885/bis-13-1269-professor-john-perkins-review-of-engineering-skills.pdf London. Department of Business, Innovation & Skills. Accessed 12 September 22
Robertson, J., & Bond, C. H. (2001). Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: what do academics value? Higher Education Research and Development., 20(1), 5–19.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, D., & Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring Phenomenology: A guide to the field and its literature. American Library Association.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised ‘approaches to teaching inventory.’ Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 349–360.
WMG. (2022). WMG shaping the future. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/. Accessed 25 July 22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, R., Andrews, J. (2023). Evaluating Applied Engineering Education: A Phenomenological Approach. In: Hong, C., Ma, W.W.K. (eds) Applied Degree Education and the Shape of Things to Come. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9315-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9314-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9315-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)