Skip to main content

“The Great Affairs of the States”: Man, the State and War in the Warring States Period

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Long East Asia

Part of the book series: Governing China in the 21st Century ((GC21))

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing on the selectorate theory, institutional explanations of war argue that leaders with larger winning coalitions tend to be more selective about the wars they fight. This argument assumes that the winning coalition is exogenously given and therefore not subject to change. We modify this assumption, arguing that interstate warfare can be a way for leaders to rearrange the winning coalition and thus secure their power. It then follows that threat posed by winning coalitions can give leaders an incentive to wage war abroad. To test this argument, we rely on original panel and dyad datasets on domestic politics and international affairs of major states in China’s Warring States period (476–221 BCE). Our cross-level theory of war, which intertwines domestic and international levels of analysis, receives empirical support from historical inquiries and quantitative analysis. By doing that, we advance, on the one hand, the institutional explanations that address the domestic origins of interstate warfare and, on the other hand, we bring a new perspective to the Qin unification of China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chan (1999), Ye (2005a, b), Yang and Wang (2005), Yan and Xu (2008), Deng (2015), Downs and Rocke (1994).

  2. 2.

    Hui (2005), Zhao (2009).

  3. 3.

    Wei (2003), Mei (2007), Xin and Zeng (2010).

  4. 4.

    Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003).

  5. 5.

    Bueno de Mesquita et al. (1999), 2004), Bausch (2015).

  6. 6.

    Clarke and Stone (2008), Kennedy (2009), Gallagher and Hanson (2015).

  7. 7.

    Chiozza and Goemans (2004), 2011), Carter (2017).

  8. 8.

    Kant (1972), Russett and Oneal (2001), Reiter and Stam (2002).

  9. 9.

    Weber (1978), Bueno de Mesquita and Smith (2011).

  10. 10.

    Gourevitch (1978).

  11. 11.

    Zhao (2004).

  12. 12.

    Waltz (2001).

  13. 13.

    Legro and Moravcsik (1999), Kapstein (1995).

  14. 14.

    Gourevitch (1978).

  15. 15.

    Levy (1996, 1997).

  16. 16.

    Filson and Werner (2004), Jackson and Morelli (2007), Baliga et al. (2011), Ramsay (2018).

  17. 17.

    Fearon (1994), Schultz (2001).

  18. 18.

    Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003).

  19. 19.

    Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2004), Morrow et al. (2008), Bausch (2015).

  20. 20.

    Goemans (2000, 2008).

  21. 21.

    Chiozza and Goemans (2004), Debs and Goemans (2010).

  22. 22.

    Carter (2017).

  23. 23.

    Gallagher and Hanson (2015).

  24. 24.

    Bodin (1955), Mayer (1969), Mueller (1970).

  25. 25.

    Levy (1989).

  26. 26.

    Downs and Rocke (1994), Richards et al. (1993), Smith (1996).

  27. 27.

    Chiozza and Goemans (2003), Meernik and Waterman (1996), Leeds and Davis (1997).

  28. 28.

    Levy and Thompson (2010).

  29. 29.

    Miller (1995), DiLorenzo (2019).

  30. 30.

    Mansfield and Snyder (1995, 2002, 2005).

  31. 31.

    Acemoglu et al. (2008).

  32. 32.

    Sekeris (2011).

  33. 33.

    Zuozhuan (1981), “The Thirteenth Year of Cheng”.

  34. 34.

    Zhanguo Ce (1991), “The Preface”, 1991.

  35. 35.

    Hui (2005).

  36. 36.

    Hui (2005).

  37. 37.

    Zhao (2011), Qi (2015).

  38. 38.

    Liu (2019).

  39. 39.

    Xin and Zeng (2010).

  40. 40.

    Qi (2015).

  41. 41.

    Liu (2019).

  42. 42.

    Wang and Qi (2013).

  43. 43.

    Zhao (2004).

  44. 44.

    Bueno de Mesquita et al. (2003).

  45. 45.

    Yang (2014).

  46. 46.

    Sikong and Sikou were two of the five most important political positions in the Western Zhou.

  47. 47.

    Zuozhuan (1981), “The Fifth Year of Zhao”.

  48. 48.

    Chunqiu Zuozhuan Zhengyi (1990), “The fifth to sixth year of Zhao”.

  49. 49.

    Shiji (1997), “Biography of the Duke Zhou of Lu”.

  50. 50.

    Shiji (1997), “Taishigong Xu”.

  51. 51.

    Yin (1987).

  52. 52.

    Chen (2009), 247.

  53. 53.

    Zhao (2011).

  54. 54.

    Du (1990).

  55. 55.

    Chao (1998), Hsu (1965), He (1996).

  56. 56.

    Mengzi (1992), “Wanzhang Xia”.

  57. 57.

    Clausewitz and Graham (1990).

  58. 58.

    Kiser and Cai (2004), Zhao (2011), Chen (2021).

  59. 59.

    Hanfeizi (1998), “Xian Xue”.

  60. 60.

    Hsu (1965).

  61. 61.

    Li (2000).

  62. 62.

    Zhu (2017).

  63. 63.

    Shiji (1997), “The Biography of Fan Sui and Cai Ze”.

  64. 64.

    Huang (2002).

  65. 65.

    Sunzi Bingfa (2007), “Xingpian”.

  66. 66.

    Shiji (1997), “The Biography of Fan Sui and Cai Ze”.

  67. 67.

    Major powers refer to the seven warring states and the Jin state before being partitioned into three parts.

  68. 68.

    Zhang (2004).

  69. 69.

    Qi (1981).

  70. 70.

    Yang (2016).

  71. 71.

    Tan (1996).

  72. 72.

    Wang and Qi (2013).

  73. 73.

    We must admit that the data on the family background of chancellors during the Warring States period is too insufficient to build a complete panel data set. There are also possible selection biases. However, our data set is sufficient to support this study.

  74. 74.

    This study does not consider the military alliance emerged during this period for two reasons. First, the incentives and the nature of the wars differed significantly for the members in the military alliance and could be affected by multi-level cofounding factors. Second, the contribution of each member in the military alliance is hard to gauge, hence affecting the accuracy of the test results. Thus, we only count the number of wars engaged by the initiators of the alliances.

  75. 75.

    Wei Liaozi (2007), “Zhanwei”.

  76. 76.

    Fan (2003).

  77. 77.

    Zhao (2004).

  78. 78.

    Chen (2021).

  79. 79.

    Beck and Katz (1995).

  80. 80.

    Ghosn et al. (2004).

  81. 81.

    The missing values in the variable “Ruling crises—the reign of the previous duke” were the result of missing historical records for the early dukes of the states of Han and Wei.

    The missing values in the variable “Ruling crises—unnatural death of the previous duke” are because of the three dukes/kings resigned before they passed away, including the King Huai of Chu, King Hui of Yan, and King Wuling of Zhao. The missing values for the variable “Power gap—number of counties” are the results of insufficient historical evidence.

  82. 82.

    Zhou and Li (2009).

  83. 83.

    Blaydes and Chaney (2013), Wang (2017).

  84. 84.

    Shiji (1997), “House of Prince Xiao of Liang”.

  85. 85.

    Wang (2009).

  86. 86.

    Zhao (2004).

  87. 87.

    Creel (1964).

  88. 88.

    Anderson and Souva (2010).

  89. 89.

    Qi (2015).

  90. 90.

    Wang and Qi (2013).

  91. 91.

    The results of Hausman’ test (not given in the paper) suggest that the panel logistic regression for testing H2a should use a fixed-effects model, but for testing H2b, only a random-effects model is sufficient. To facilitate analysis and presentation, the models listed in the tables in this paper all use random-effects model. Even if the fixed effects model is used, the results still support the hypotheses of this article, which can be obtained from the author.

  92. 92.

    Liu (2019).

  93. 93.

    According to Qi Haixia, these balance-of-power wars included eight wars such as the war to conquer Wei and rescue Zhao and the war against Wei to rescue Han.

  94. 94.

    Zhao (2011).

  95. 95.

    The Qin king’s great-grandson Yin’s prayer to the spirits of the Mount Huatai.

  96. 96.

    Lunyu (1992). “Jishi”.

  97. 97.

    Qi (2015).

  98. 98.

    Wang and Qi (2013).

  99. 99.

    Hui (2005), Zhao (2009).

  100. 100.

    Wei (2003), Qi (2015), Liu (2019).

  101. 101.

    Pines (2005), von Falkenhausen (2006), Zhao (2014).

  102. 102.

    Yan (2009).

  103. 103.

    Li and Qin (2017).

  104. 104.

    Shiji (1997), “The Biography of Fan Sui and Cai Ze”.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., Sonin, K. (2008). ‘Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies,’ Review of Economic Studies, 75 (4), pp. 987–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. and Souva, M. (2010). ‘The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54 (4), pp. 543–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, S., Lucca, D. O., Sjöström, T. (2011). ‘Domestic Political Survival and International Conflict: Is Democracy Good for Peace?’ The Review of Economic Studies, 2 (78), pp. 458–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, W. A. (2015). ‘Democracy, War Effort, and the Systemic Democratic Peace,’ Journal of Peace Research, 42 (4), pp. 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995). ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data,’ American Political Science Review, 89 (3), pp. 634–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaydes, L. and Chaney, E. (2013). ‘The Feudal Revolution and Europe’s Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE,’ American Political Science Review, 107 (1), pp. 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, J. (1955). Six Books of the Commonwealth, translated by M. J. Tooley, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., and Morrow, J. D. (1999). ‘An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace,’ The American Political Science Review, 93 (4), pp. 791–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2004) ‘Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War,’ World Politics, 56 (3), pp. 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Smith, A. (2011). The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: Public Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2012). ‘Domestic Explanations of International Relations,’ Annual Review of Political Science, 15, pp. 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (2017). ‘The Political Cost of War Mobilization in Democracies and Dictatorships,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61 (8), pp. 1768–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, G. (1999). ‘The Origins of the Inter-state System: Warring States in Ancient China,’ Issues & Studies, 35 (1), pp. 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, F. (1998). ‘On the Powers of Prime Ministers during the Warring States Period,’ Social Sciences in China, (5), pp. 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (2009). The World of Ancient Thoughts and Cultures. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2021). ‘State Formation and Bureaucratization: Evidence from Pre-Imperial China.’ Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiozza, G. and Goemans, H. (2003). ‘Peace through Insecurity: Tenure and International Conflict,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47 (4), pp. 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2004). ‘International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?’ American Journal of Political Science, 48 (3), pp. 604–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2011). Leaders and International Conflict, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chunqiu Zuozhuan Zhengyi. (1990). Annotated by Kan Huang, Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunqiu Zuozhuan Zhu. (1981). Annotated by Yang Bojun. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. A. and Stone, R. W. (2008). ‘Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival,’ American Political Science Review, 102 (3), pp. 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. V. and Graham, J. J. (1990). On War. Champaign, Ill.: Project Gutenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H. G. (1964). ‘The Beginning of Bureaucracy in China: The Origin of the Hsien,’ Journal of Asian Studies, 23 (2), pp. 155–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debs, A. and Goemans, H. (2010). ‘Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War,’ American Political Science Review, 104 (3), pp. 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X. (2015). Conflict and Coordination— Focused on the Wars and Conferences in Spring and Autumn Period. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLorenzo, M. (2019). ‘Leader Survival, Sources of Political Insecurity, and International Conflict,’ Political Research Quarterly, 73 (3), pp. 596–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W. and Rocke, D. M. (1994). ‘Conflict, Agency and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War,’ American Journal of Political Science, 38 (2), pp. 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Z. (1990). The Appearance of the ‘Registration of Commoner Households’ and Its Historical Significance: A Study of the Registration of Commoner Households. Taipei: Linking Publishing Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethan B. K. (1995). ‘Is Realism Dead? The Domestic Sources of International Politics,’ International Organization, 49 (4), pp. 751–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X. ed. (2003). War Moboilizations in Ancient China. Beijing: Military Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D. (1994). ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes,’ The American Political Science Review, 83 (3), pp. 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filson, D. and Werner, S. (2004). ‘Bargaining and Fighting: The Impact of Regime Type on War Onset, Duration, and Outcomes,’ American Journal of Political Science, 48 (2), pp. 296–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fravel, M. T. (2010). “The Limits of Diversion: Rethinking Internal and External Conflict”, Security Studies, 19 (2), pp. 307–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. E. and Hanson, J. K. (2015). ‘Power Tool or Dull Blade? Selectorate Theory for Autocracies,’ Annual Review of Political Science, 18, pp. 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosn, F., Glenn, P. and Bremer, S. A. (2004). ‘The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description,’ Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21 (2), pp. 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goemans, H. (2000). ‘Fighting for Survival, the Fate of Leaders and the Duration of War,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44 (5), pp. 555–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2008). ‘Which Way Out? The Manner and Consequences of Losing office,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52 (6), pp. 771–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, P. (1978). ‘The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,’ International Organisation, 32 (4), pp. 881–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanfeizi. (1998). Compiled by Wang Xianshen. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H. (1996). The Hereditary Society and Its Collapse: The Spring and Autumn Period of Chinese History. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. (1965). Ancient China in Transition: An Analysis of Social Mobility, 722–222 B.C. Redwood: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L. (2002). ‘A Review on the Official Selection System in Qin’, in Huang Liuzhu: Discussions Regarding Qinhan History Culture, Xi’an: Xi’an Sanqin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, V. T. (2005). 1st Edition. War and state formation in ancient China and early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. O. and Morelli, M. (2007). ‘Political Bias and War,’ The American Economic Review, 97 (4), pp. 1353–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (1970). ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson,’ American Political Science Review, 64 (1), pp. 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1972). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (2009). ‘Survival and Accountability: An Analysis of the Empirical Support for ‘Selectorate Theory’,’ International Studies Quarterly, 53 (3), pp. 695–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, E. B. (1995). ‘Is Realism Dead? The Domestic Sources of International Politics,’ International Organization, 49(4), pp. 751–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, E. and Cai, Y. (2004). ‘Early Chinese Bureaucratisation in Comparative Perspective: Reply to Zhao,’ American Sociological Review, 69 (4), pp. 608–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, B. A. and Davis, D. R. (1997). ‘Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (6), pp. 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W. and Moravcsik, A. (1999). ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’ International Security, 24 (2), pp. 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S. (1989). The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique, in Manus I. Midlarsky, ed., Handbook of War Studies, London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 259–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1996). ‘Loss Aversion, Framing, and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory for International Conflict,’ International Political Science Review, 17 (2) pp. 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1997). ‘Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations,’ International Studies Quarterly, 41 (1), pp. 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S. and Thompson, W. R. (2010). Cause of War. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. (2000). ‘The Establishment of Han Empire and the Group of Liu Bang: A Research the Beneficiaries of the Peerage system’. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. and Qin, X. (2017). The Waiqi Politics of Ancient China. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2019), ‘Counter Balance of Power logic’ and the Evolution of International System – Race to Expand and the Demise of the Warring States System,’ Foreign Affairs Review (5), pp. 104–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunyu yizhu. (1992). Annotated by Yang Bojun. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. D. and Snyder, J. L. (1995). ‘Democratisation and the Danger of War,’ International Security, 20 (1), pp. 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2002). ‘Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength, and War,’ International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 297–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2005). Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A. J. (1969). ‘Internal Causes and Purpose of War in Europe, 1870–1956,’ Journal of Modern History, 41(3), pp. 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meernik, J. and Waterman, P. (1996). ‘The Myth of the Diversionary Use of Force by American Presidents,’ Political Research Quarterly, 49 (3), pp. 573–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei, R. (2007). ‘Central-Peripheral Theory: A New Geopolitical Model for Explaining the Rise and Fall of Great Powers’, in International Political Quarterly, 1, pp. 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengzi Yizhu. (1992). Annotated by Yang Bojun. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A. (1995). ‘Domestic Structures and the Diversionary Use of Force,’ American Journal of Political Science, 39 (3), pp. 760–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D. J. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Siverson, R. M., Smith, A. (2008). ‘Retesting Selectorate Theory: Separating the Effects of War from Other Elements of Democracy,’ American Political Science Review, 102 (3), pp. 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, Y. (2005). “Bias and Their Sources: Qin History in the ‘Shiji’,” Oriens Extremus, 45 (6), pp. 10–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, S. (1981). Discovery and Research into History of China. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, H. (2015). ‘The End of Warring States and Failure of Balancing: A Study on the Stratagem of Vertical and Horizontal Alliances of the Warring States Period,’ Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies, (5), pp. 4–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, C. K. K. (2018). ‘Dyadic Conflict: Elites, Citizens, and War’, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, D. and Stam, A. C. (2002). Democracies at War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. T., Morgan, C., Wilson, R. K., Schwebach, V. L. and Young, G. D. (1993). ‘Good Times, Bad Times and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37 (3), pp. 504–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. and Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. A. (2001). Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sekeris, P. G. (2011). ‘Endogenous Elites: Power Structure and Patron-client Relationships,’ Economics of Governance, 12, pp. 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiji. (1997). By Simaqian. Annotated by Zhang Shoujie, Sima Zhen, and Pei Yin. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1996). ‘Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems,’ International Studies Quarterly, 40 (1), pp. 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunzi Bingfa. (2007). In Wujing Qishu. Annotated by Pian Yuqian, Li Jiemin and Sheng Dongling. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Q. (ed.) (1996). The Historical Atlas of China Book 1. Beijing: Sinomap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Falkenhausen, L. (2006). Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1050–250 BC): The Archeological Evidence. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (2001). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (2009). On Yin and Zhou Systems in the complete collection of Wang Guowei volume 8. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2017), Sons and Lovers: Political Stability in China and Europe Before the Great Divergence, Tsinghua Sociological Review 2, pp. 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. and Qi, H. (2013). ‘Statistical Analysis on Correlations of Inter-State Wars during the Spring Autumn and Warring States Period’ in The Journal of International Studies, (1), pp. 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Z. (2003). ‘The Puzzle of Collective Action and the Balancing of Hegemony’, International Review, 4 (4), pp. 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Liaozi. (2007). In Wujing Qishu. Annotated by Pian Yuqian, Li Jiemin and Sheng Dongling. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Writing group of Military History of China (2002), ‘Historical Timeline of Wars in China, Vol.1’. Beijing: PLA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, W. and Zeng, X. (2010). ‘Different Behavioural Logics of Actors in the ‘Multinational System’ and Their Roots—a discussion with Xu Tianbo’, in World Economics and Politics, (5), pp. 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, G. (2009). ‘The Guest Ministers of Qin’ in the Collection of Yan Genwang’s Writings. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. and Xu, J. (2008). Selected Readings on Inter-state Political Thoughts in Pre-Qin China. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2014). ‘Two Evolutionary Paths of Great Power’s Strategies for Power Competition: Comparative Research of the International Systems of the Autumn and Spring Period and the Post-World War II era’, Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies, (5), pp. 4–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. (2016). Chronicle Research on Historical Evidence during the Warring States. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. and Wang, H. (2005). ‘Were the Leud States in Spring and Autumn Period Independent Countries?’ China’s Borderland History and Geography Studies, (4), pp. 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Z. (2005a). ‘The Origin of Chinese Diplomacy: On the Nature of the Zhou Royal Family and the States in the Spring and Autumn Period,’ in The Journal of International Studies, (1), pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Z. (2005b). ‘On China's Perspective in International Studies,’ Foreign Affairs Review, (3), pp. 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Z. (1987). ‘Through the Passing Down of the Crown and Regicide: The Gradual Formation of the Autocratic Monarch Theory,’ Journal of Chinese History Studies, (4), pp. 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (ed.) (2004). Dictionary of Grand Chancellor in China. Guangzhou: Guangdong Education Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhanguo Ce Zhushi. (1991). By Liu Xiang. Annotated by He Jianzhang. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D. (2004). ‘Spurious Causation in Historical Process: War and Bureaucratization in Early China,’ American Sociological Review, 69 (4), pp. 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2009). ‘The Historical Roots of China’s Unification’, Beijing Cultural Review, (6), pp. 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2011) 2nd Edition. Wars of the Eastern Zhou and the Birth of The Confucian-Legalist State. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. (2014). “New Explorations of Early Qin Culture,” in Yuri Pines, et al. (eds.) Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. and Li, X. (2009). General History of Chinese Administrative Divisions Overview and pre-Qin Dynasty. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S. (2017). A Study of Military Achievement-Based Promotion System. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Meng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meng, K., Zeng, J. (2023). “The Great Affairs of the States”: Man, the State and War in the Warring States Period. In: Wang, Z. (eds) The Long East Asia. Governing China in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8784-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics