Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of a sociohistorical perspective for the design of school buildings in the USA. Underscoring this overview are questions about how educational practice and research can provide insight to the interior spatial design of these buildings. To ground the concepts about education, practice, and interior spatial design of learning environments, Montessori, Central Park East Public School and Big Picture Learning Australia are proposed as exemplary educational programs. By providing these international educational programs, this chapter showcases how and why the design of schools can be imagined. To buttress the ideas promoted by these educational programs, Optimal Learning Theory (Csikszentmihalyi in, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper and Row, 1990), Situated Learning theory (Lave and Wenger in, Situated learning, Cambridge University Press, 1991), and Osmond’s Theory (Doubleday, 1966) on seating arrangements, sociopetal, and sociofugal are introduced. Building on theory and practice in the field of education and environmental psychology, this chapter provides recommendations for crafting the physical environment to encourage learning.
This chapter is based on Dyck’s extensive work in the USA as an educator and school designer. He will identify the five essential issues that designers must understand in order to craft innovative high school buildings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alterator, S. & Deed, C. (2016). Reacting to ‘irregular’ learning environments in a senior secondary school. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308391063
Architectural Research Laboratory. (1965). The effect of windowless classrooms on elementary school children. University of Michigan.
Barth, R. S. (1972). Open education and the American school. Schocken Books.
Benade, L. (2016). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631
Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484448
Big Picture Learning Australia. (2021b). Why Australia? | Big Picture Education Australia. www.bigpicture.org.au/about-us/why-australia. Viewed on June 14, 2021.
Big Picture Learning Australia. (2021a). Our Purpose | Big Picture Education Australia. www.bigpicture.org.au/about-us/our-purpose. Viewed on December 20, 2021.
Bissell, J. (1995, May). Patterns for effective high school environments [Unpublished Thesis]. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Boyer, E. l. (1995) The basic school: A community for learning (p. 16). The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Byers, T. & Lippman, P. C. (2018). Classroom design should follow evidence, not architectural fad. http://theconversation.com/classroom-design-should-follow-evidence-not-architectural-fads-89861
Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglements in innovative learning spaces: Connecting, theory, design and practice. IN the British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/ber.3483.
Cleveland, B. (2016). Engaging space. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(5), 385–398.
Cohen, E. G. (1976). Open space schools: The opportunity to become ambitious. In R. M. Pavalko (Ed.), Sociology of education: A book of readings. F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row. ISBN: 0-06-092043-2.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial. ISBN: 0-06-092820-4.
Daggett, W. (2016). Making schools work: A vision for college and career ready learning. Math Solutions. ISBN: 132801231X, 9781328012319.
Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice OECD. Paris.
Dyck, J. A. (2002, April). Just a thought: Flow—Optimal experience and the built environment. CAE Net Quarterly Newsletter. AIA Committee on Architecture for Education.
Einstein. (1934). https://www.quotes.net/quote/38415. Viewed on October 26, 2021.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychological Association, Inc., 53(1), 5–26.
Gump, P. V. (1987). School and classroom environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman, (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1).
Humphryes, J. (1998). The developmental appropriateness of high-quality montessori programs. Young Children, 53, 4–16.
Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Advances in learning environments research. Sense Publishers.
Imms, W., Morris, J., & Grunseit, D. (2020). Innovative furniture and student engagement. In: M. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation. Springer.
Hirsch, E.S. (1984). The block book. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Knowlton, D. S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: a defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. In R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton & B. W. Speck (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (Vol. 84, pp. 5–22).
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Lippman, P. C. (1995). The meaning of constructed objects [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York.
Lippman, P. C. (2004). The L-shaped classroom: A pattern for promoting learning. DesignShare: The International Forum for Innovative Schools. http://www.designshare.com/articles/article.asp?article=100
Lippman, P. C. (2013). Designing collaborative spaces for schools: Part 1. The Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2013/02/13/designing-collaborative-spaces-for-schools.aspx
Lippman, P. C. (Expected Date of Publication, 2023). Understanding the Function of Complementary Settings in Contemporary Learning Environments [Ph.D., La Trobe University]. The School of Arts, Sciences & Commerce, Victoria, Australia.
Lippman, P. C. (2010). Evidence base design for elementary and secondary schools: A responsive approach to creating learning environments. John Wiley and Sons.
Lippman, P. C. (2019). Engaging the Learner: Crafting Contemporary Classrooms. http://www.educationmattersmag.com.au/crafting-contemporary-classrooms/
Lippman, P. C., & Matthews, E. (2018). Re-imagining the open classroom. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation: The conceptualisation and evaluation of innovative learning environments (pp. 63–85). Sense Publishers.
Mahat, M., Bradbeer, C., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2018). Innovative learning environments and teacher change: Defining key concepts. Retrieved from Melbourne, Australia. http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports
Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139–156.
Matthews, E., & Lippman, P. C. (2016). The physical environment of the early learning center: A key to quality education. In S. Alterator, C. Deed (eds.), School space and its occupation: The conceptualisation and evaluation of innovative learning environments. 87–105. Sense Publishers.
Montessori, M. (1932/1972). Peace and education. An address by Maria Montessori for the International Bureau of Education, Geneva, 1932.
Montessori, M. (1946/1974). Education for a new world (pp. 3–4). Kalakshetra Publications.
Montessori, M. (1965). Montessori’s own handbook. Schocken Books Inc.
Montessori, M. (1991). Montessori Method I, spontaneous activity in education. Barnes and Noble.
Moore, G. T. (1986). Effects of the spatial definition of behaviour settings on children’s behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(3), 205–231.
Oppenheimer, T. (1999). Schooling the imagination. Atlantic Monthly, 284(3), 71–83. Also available: http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99sep/9909waldorf.htm
Osmond, H. (1966). Some psychiatric aspects of design. In L. B. Holland (Ed.), Who designs America? (pp. 281–318). Doubleday.
Pederson, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory and Psychology, 26(6), 731–750.
PEHKA. (2012). Unpublished responsive research report. Projects for Environmental Health Knowledge and Action, Inc. http://pehka.org/
Proshansky, E., & Wolfe, M. (1974). The physical setting and open education. School Review, 82, 557–574.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.
Rathunde, K. (2015). Insider’s view. [Based on a 2005 article reprinted from the Elementary School Journal.] In S. Miller-Cochran, R. Stamper, & S. Cochran (Eds.), An insider’s guide to academic writing (pp. 152–165). Bedford/St. Martin’s. Published.
Reiselbach, A. (1992). Buildings and learning. New schools for New York: Plans and precedents for small schools (pp. 152–193). The Architectural League of New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Inc.
Rivlin, L. G., & Rothenberg, M. (1976). The use of space in open classrooms. In Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (Eds.). Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 479–489). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rivlin, L. G. & Wolfe, M. (1985). Institutional settings in children’s lives. John Wiley & Sons.
Rivlin, L. G., & Weinstein, C. S. (1984). Educational issues, school settings, and environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(4), 347–364.
Sanoff, H. (1993). Designing a responsive school environment. Children’s Environments, 10(2), 140–153.
Sanoff, H. (2002). Community participation methods in design and planning. John Wiley & Sons.
Seuss, T. G. (2021). https://www.quotenova.net/authors/dr-seuss/xa9meg. Viewed May 13, 2021.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
Taylor, A. P., & Vlastos, G. (1975). School zone: Learning environment for children (p. 1975). Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1997). Rousing minds to life: Teaching and learning in context. Cambridge University Press.
Weinstein, C. S. (Autumn 1979). The physical environment of school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.
Wernick, L. (2007). Prototype schools designs: Can prototypes be used successfully? A Report Prepared for Council for Educational Facility Planners, International. http://www.hmfh.com/thinking/prototype%20schools%20report.pdf
Young, F., Cleveland, B., & Imms, W. (2019). The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: educators’ and architects’ perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00354-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dyck, J.A., Lippman, P.C. (2023). Creating Dynamic School Buildings that Activate the Learner and the Learning Process. In: Lippman, P.C., Matthews, E.A. (eds) Creating Dynamic Places for Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8749-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8749-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8748-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8749-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)