Skip to main content

Creating Dynamic School Buildings that Activate the Learner and the Learning Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Dynamic Places for Learning

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of a sociohistorical perspective for the design of school buildings in the USA. Underscoring this overview are questions about how educational practice and research can provide insight to the interior spatial design of these buildings. To ground the concepts about education, practice, and interior spatial design of learning environments, Montessori, Central Park East Public School and Big Picture Learning Australia are proposed as exemplary educational programs. By providing these international educational programs, this chapter showcases how and why the design of schools can be imagined. To buttress the ideas promoted by these educational programs, Optimal Learning Theory (Csikszentmihalyi in, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper and Row, 1990), Situated Learning theory (Lave and Wenger in, Situated learning, Cambridge University Press, 1991), and Osmond’s Theory (Doubleday, 1966) on seating arrangements, sociopetal, and sociofugal are introduced. Building on theory and practice in the field of education and environmental psychology, this chapter provides recommendations for crafting the physical environment to encourage learning.

This chapter is based on Dyck’s extensive work in the USA as an educator and school designer. He will identify the five essential issues that designers must understand in order to craft innovative high school buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alterator, S. & Deed, C. (2016). Reacting to ‘irregular’ learning environments in a senior secondary school. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308391063

  • Architectural Research Laboratory. (1965). The effect of windowless classrooms on elementary school children. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. S. (1972). Open education and the American school. Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benade, L. (2016). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Big Picture Learning Australia. (2021b). Why Australia? | Big Picture Education Australia. www.bigpicture.org.au/about-us/why-australia. Viewed on June 14, 2021.

  • Big Picture Learning Australia. (2021a). Our Purpose | Big Picture Education Australia. www.bigpicture.org.au/about-us/our-purpose. Viewed on December 20, 2021.

  • Bissell, J. (1995, May). Patterns for effective high school environments [Unpublished Thesis]. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. l. (1995) The basic school: A community for learning (p. 16). The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T. & Lippman, P. C. (2018). Classroom design should follow evidence, not architectural fad. http://theconversation.com/classroom-design-should-follow-evidence-not-architectural-fads-89861

  • Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglements in innovative learning spaces: Connecting, theory, design and practice. IN the British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/ber.3483.

  • Cleveland, B. (2016). Engaging space. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(5), 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1976). Open space schools: The opportunity to become ambitious. In R. M. Pavalko (Ed.), Sociology of education: A book of readings. F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row. ISBN: 0-06-092043-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial. ISBN: 0-06-092820-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggett, W. (2016). Making schools work: A vision for college and career ready learning. Math Solutions. ISBN: 132801231X, 9781328012319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice OECD. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, J. A. (2002, April). Just a thought: Flow—Optimal experience and the built environment. CAE Net Quarterly Newsletter. AIA Committee on Architecture for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein. (1934). https://www.quotes.net/quote/38415. Viewed on October 26, 2021.

  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychological Association, Inc., 53(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gump, P. V. (1987). School and classroom environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman, (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphryes, J. (1998). The developmental appropriateness of high-quality montessori programs. Young Children, 53, 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Advances in learning environments research. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imms, W., Morris, J., & Grunseit, D. (2020). Innovative furniture and student engagement. In: M. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E.S. (1984). The block book. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, D. S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: a defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. In R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton & B. W. Speck (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (Vol. 84, pp. 5–22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (1995). The meaning of constructed objects [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (2004). The L-shaped classroom: A pattern for promoting learning. DesignShare: The International Forum for Innovative Schools. http://www.designshare.com/articles/article.asp?article=100

  • Lippman, P. C. (2013). Designing collaborative spaces for schools: Part 1. The Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2013/02/13/designing-collaborative-spaces-for-schools.aspx

  • Lippman, P. C. (Expected Date of Publication, 2023). Understanding the Function of Complementary Settings in Contemporary Learning Environments [Ph.D., La Trobe University]. The School of Arts, Sciences & Commerce, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (2010). Evidence base design for elementary and secondary schools: A responsive approach to creating learning environments. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (2019). Engaging the Learner: Crafting Contemporary Classrooms. http://www.educationmattersmag.com.au/crafting-contemporary-classrooms/

  • Lippman, P. C., & Matthews, E. (2018). Re-imagining the open classroom. In S. Alterator & C. Deed (Eds.), School space and its occupation: The conceptualisation and evaluation of innovative learning environments (pp. 63–85). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahat, M., Bradbeer, C., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2018). Innovative learning environments and teacher change: Defining key concepts. Retrieved from Melbourne, Australia. http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports

  • Martin, S. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E., & Lippman, P. C. (2016). The physical environment of the early learning center: A key to quality education. In S. Alterator, C. Deed (eds.), School space and its occupation: The conceptualisation and evaluation of innovative learning environments. 87–105. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1932/1972). Peace and education. An address by Maria Montessori for the International Bureau of Education, Geneva, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1946/1974). Education for a new world (pp. 3–4). Kalakshetra Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1965). Montessori’s own handbook. Schocken Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1991). Montessori Method I, spontaneous activity in education. Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T. (1986). Effects of the spatial definition of behaviour settings on children’s behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, T. (1999). Schooling the imagination. Atlantic Monthly, 284(3), 71–83. Also available: http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99sep/9909waldorf.htm

  • Osmond, H. (1966). Some psychiatric aspects of design. In L. B. Holland (Ed.), Who designs America? (pp. 281–318). Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory and Psychology, 26(6), 731–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEHKA. (2012). Unpublished responsive research report. Projects for Environmental Health Knowledge and Action, Inc. http://pehka.org/

  • Proshansky, E., & Wolfe, M. (1974). The physical setting and open education. School Review, 82, 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathunde, K. (2015). Insider’s view. [Based on a 2005 article reprinted from the Elementary School Journal.] In S. Miller-Cochran, R. Stamper, & S. Cochran (Eds.), An insider’s guide to academic writing (pp. 152–165). Bedford/St. Martin’s. Published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiselbach, A. (1992). Buildings and learning. New schools for New York: Plans and precedents for small schools (pp. 152–193). The Architectural League of New York: Princeton Architectural Press. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, L. G., & Rothenberg, M. (1976). The use of space in open classrooms. In Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (Eds.). Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 479–489). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, L. G. & Wolfe, M. (1985). Institutional settings in children’s lives. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, L. G., & Weinstein, C. S. (1984). Educational issues, school settings, and environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(4), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (1993). Designing a responsive school environment. Children’s Environments, 10(2), 140–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (2002). Community participation methods in design and planning. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuss, T. G. (2021). https://www.quotenova.net/authors/dr-seuss/xa9meg. Viewed May 13, 2021.

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. P., & Vlastos, G. (1975). School zone: Learning environment for children (p. 1975). Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1997). Rousing minds to life: Teaching and learning in context. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. S. (Autumn 1979). The physical environment of school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernick, L. (2007). Prototype schools designs: Can prototypes be used successfully? A Report Prepared for Council for Educational Facility Planners, International. http://www.hmfh.com/thinking/prototype%20schools%20report.pdf

  • Young, F., Cleveland, B., & Imms, W. (2019). The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: educators’ and architects’ perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00354-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Lippman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dyck, J.A., Lippman, P.C. (2023). Creating Dynamic School Buildings that Activate the Learner and the Learning Process. In: Lippman, P.C., Matthews, E.A. (eds) Creating Dynamic Places for Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8749-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics