Abstract
Nanotechnology can be employed in changing the implant surface chemistry and topography which can in turn affect osteointegration, the most crucial aspect for implant success. Currently, implants are primarily fabricated from titanium, titanium alloys, and ceramic based materials such as zirconia. After fabrication with these primary materials, the topography of the implant surfaces can then be effectively modified using various physical and chemical methods. Physical methods commonly employed include plasma spraying, sputtering, ion implantation, and titanium dioxide coatings. Lasers and UV photofunctionalisation have also been employed to physically alter the surface characteristics and augment the biological activity at the implant interface. In addition to these physical methods, chemical methods such as anodisation, acid treatment with sulfuric acid or nitric acid, alkali treatment with sodium or potassium hydroxide, sol–gel method, chemical vapor deposition or a combination of these methods can also be successfully used. The quality of osseointegration of such nanomodified implants has to be assessed using in vivo models. While more research is definitely required, nanotechnology offers exciting new frontiers in developing better dental implants and combining nanotechnology with other cutting-edge fields such as tissue engineering that can prove to be exciting and in the long run provide optimum clinical results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pye AD, Lockhart DE, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ (2009) A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect 72(2):104–110
Christenson EM, Anseth KS, van den Beucken JJ, Chan CK, Ercan B, Jansen JA, Laurencin CT, Li WJ, Murugan R, Nair LS, Ramakrishna S, Tuan RS, Webster TJ, Mikos AG (2007) Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res 25(1):11–22
Lavenus S, Ricquier JC, Louarn G, Layrolle P (2010) Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants. Nanomedicine (Lond) 5(6):937–947
Ercan B, Taylor E, Alpaslan E, Webster TJ (2011) Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology 22(29):295102
Kummer KM, Taylor EN, Durmas NG, Tarquinio KM, Ercan B, Webster TJ (2013) Effects of different sterilization techniques and varying anodized TiO2 nanotube dimensions on bacteria growth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101(5):677–688
Zhang H, Sun Y, Tian A, Xue XX, Wang L, Alquhali A, Bai X (2013) Improved antibacterial activity and biocompatibility on vancomycin-loaded TiO2 nanotubes: in vivo and in vitro studies. Int J Nanomed 8:4379–4389
Cordeiro JM, Barão VAR (2017) Is there scientific evidence favoring the substitution of commercially pure titanium with titanium alloys for the manufacture of dental implants? Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 1(71):1201–1215
Osman RB, Swain MV (2015) A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials (Basel) 8(3):932–958
Carinci F, Pezzetti F, Volinia S, Francioso F, Arcelli D, Farina E, Piattelli A (2004) Zirconium oxide: analysis of MG63 osteoblast-like cell response by means of a microarray technology. Biomaterials 25(2):215–228
Chevalier J (2006) What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials 27(4):535–543
Katunar MR, Gomez Sanchez A, Santos Coquillat A, Civantos A, Martinez Campos E, Ballarre J, Vico T, Baca M, Ramos V, Cere S (2017) In vitro and in vivo characterization of anodised zirconium as a potential material for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 1(75):957–968
Sartoretto SC, Calasans-Maia J, Resende R, Câmara E, Ghiraldini B, Barbosa Bezerra FJ, Granjeiro JM, Calasans-Maia MD (2020) The influence of nanostructured hydroxyapatite surface in the early stages of osseointegration: a multiparameter animal study in low-density bone. Int J Nanomed 10(15):8803–8817
Ono D, Jimbo R, Kawachi G, Ioku K, Ikeda T, Sawase T (2011) Lateral bone augmentation with newly developed β-tricalcium phosphate block: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(12):1366–1371
Bao L, Liu J, Shi F, Jiang Y, Liu G (2014) Preparation and characterization of TiO2 and Si-doped octacalcium phosphate composite coatings on zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP) for dental implant applications. Appl Surf Sci 30(290):48–52
Stefanic M, Krnel K, Pribosic I, Kosmac T (2012) Rapid biomimetic deposition of octacalcium phosphate coatings on zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP) for dental implant applications. Appl Surf Sci 258(10):4649–4656
Joy-anne NO, Su Y, Lu X, Kuo PH, Du J, Zhu D (2019) Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications. Bioactive Mater 1(4):261–270
Rasouli R, Barhoum A, Uludag H (2018) A review of nanostructured surfaces and materials for dental implants: surface coating, patterning and functionalization for improved performance. Biomater Sci 6(6):1312–1338
Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJ, Affrossman S, Curtis AS (2002) Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. Tissue Eng 8(6):1099–1108
Zheng Y, Li J, Liu X, Sun J (2012) Antimicrobial and osteogenic effect of Ag-implanted titanium with a nanostructured surface. Int J Nanomed 7:875
Pachauri P, Bathala LR, Sangur R (2014) Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications. J Adv Prosthodont 6(6):498–504
Tomsia AP, Launey ME, Lee JS, Mankani MH, Wegst UG, Saiz E (2011) Nanotechnology approaches for better dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(Suppl):25
Botticelli D, Lang NP (2017) Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models-a comparative analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res 28(6):742–748
Kulkarni M, Mazare A, Schmuki P, Iglič A (2014) Biomaterial surface modification of titanium and titanium alloys for medical applications. Nanomedicine 111:111
Curtis A, Wilkinson C (2001) Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 19(3):97–101
Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO (2007) The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 6(12):997–1003
Anselme K, Bigerelle M (2006) Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17(5):471–479
Jandt KD, Watts DC (2020) Nanotechnology in dentistry: present and future perspectives on dental nanomaterials. Dental Mater
Zhang Y, Gulati K, Li Z, Di P, Liu Y (2021) Dental implant nano-engineering: advances, limitations and future directions. Nanomaterials 11(10):2489
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, B., Ramesh, A. (2023). Nanotechnology in Dental Implantology. In: Thomas, S., Baiju, R.M. (eds) Nanomaterials in Dental Medicine. Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8718-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8718-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8717-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8718-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)