Abstract
This chapter measures technical efficiency scores (TE) of government and government-aided schools for secondary education in Kolkata using primary survey data, collected through multistage stratified random sampling procedure, employing data envelopment analysis and obtains the determinants of such TE. It is evident that about 52% of the sample schools are not perfectly efficient, implying that these schools can produce more output with existing resources, and the magnitude of TE varies among the schools. It is observed that a huge percentage of students undertake private tuition which may affect TE. Thus, to find out the determinants of TE, the paper considers the effect of (i) percentage number of students taking private tuition, (ii) the role of the headmaster/mistress (HM), (iii) the characteristics of the HM, (iv) the characteristics of the teachers, (v) school infrastructure and administration related variables, (vi) school characteristics and student composition-related variables, (vii) policy-related variables, (viii) socio-economic background of the students, (ix) quality of school attributes based on student’s perceptions. The results support that the TE is positively related to the percentage number of students taking private tuition and the part of the variation of TE which is not explained by the percentage number of students taking private tuition is low; it ranges from 1.5 to 23.8%, with mean value 8.28%. Further, TE is negatively and significantly related to service experience of headmaster/mistress (HM) and full time teachers, meaning that schools with relatively junior HM and junior teachers will have higher TE. TE is positively related to (a) the role of the HM in school management, i.e., while taking any policy decision whether HM interacts with students and teachers, and also the interaction between this variable with the variable specifying the frequency of interaction of HM with State Education Department; the existence of interaction term implies, given the value of one variable, TE will in turn depend on the value of the other, showing the importance of the both, (b) school infrastructure variables, i.e., whether Librarian of the school is on duty, (c) policy variable like (i) the proportion of students getting Kanyashree (an initiative taken by the government of West Bengal to improve the life and status of girls by helping economically backward families with cash transfer so that they do not arrange for the marriage of the girls before eighteen years), where nonlinear inverted U-shaped relationship between the proportion of students getting Kanyashree and TE is obtained, with positive marginal effect for the present sample, implying that an increase in Kanyashree will boost up TE and (ii) on the availability of government fund to the schools, (d) the school characteristics, student composition, and students characteristics-related variables like the class size as represented by the number of sections in the class, the proportion of reserved category students, and the proportion of students having text book at their home.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adkins, L. C. & Moomaw, R. L. (2007). Analyzing the technical efficiency of School Districts in Oklahoma. Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, 33(2), 41–61.
Anand, S, & Sen, A. (1997). Concepts of human development and poverty: A multidimensional perspective, in poverty and human development process (pp. 1–20). United Nations Development Programme.
Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus? Economics of Education Review, 21, 245–262.
Arshad, M. N. M. (2014). Efficiency of secondary education in selected OIC countries. Global Education Review, 1(4), 53–75.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
Bessent, A. M., & Bessent, E. W. (1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 57–75.
Bhanja, A., Ghose, A. (2022). Input-oriented technical efficiency and its determinants of primary education in West Bengal: A district-level analysis. In S. Bagli, G. Chakrabarti, & P. Guha (Eds.), Persistent and the emerging challenges to development: Insights for policy-Gmaking in India (pp. 253–275). Springer Nature.
Bonesronning, H., & Rattsq, J. (1994). Efficiency variation among Norwegian high schools: Consequences of equalization policy. Economics of Education Review, 3(4), 289–304.
Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. (2002). The effect of the Quasi–market on the efficiency–equity trade–off in the secondary school sector. Bulletin of Economic Research, 54(3), 295–314.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27(6), 668–669.
Choudhury, S., & Ghose, A. (2022). Does an increase in enrollment of girls relative to boys stimulate technical efficiency of secondary education? Empirical evidence using non-parametric data envelopment analysis with Indian State level data. In C. Chakraborty & P. Pal (Eds.), Environmental sustainability, growth trajectory and gender: Contemporary issues of developing economies (pp. 181–194). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Ciro, A. J., & Torres, G. A. (2018). Economic efficiency of public secondary education expenditure: How different are developed and developing countries? Desarrollo y Sociedad, 80, 119–154.
Driscoll, D., Halcoussis, D., & Svorny, S. (2003). School district size and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 22, 193–201.
Gavurova, B., Kocisova, K., Belas, L., & Krajcik, V. (2017). Relative efficiency of government expenditure on secondary education. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 329–343.
Ghose, A. (2017). Efficiency of elementary education in India, empirical evidence using a nonparametric data envelopment approach. Springer.
Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 43–73). The Brookings Institution.
Haug, A. A., & Blackburn, V. C. (2017). Government secondary school finances in New South Wales: Accounting for students’ prior achievements in a two-stage DEA at the school level. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 48(1), 69–83.
Hulten, C. R. (1996). Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important than how much you have (NBER Working Paper, 5847).
Kingdon, G. (1996). The quality and efficiency of private and public education: A case study of urban India. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(1), 57–82.
Krueger, A. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class Size. The Economic Journal, 113(February), F34–F63.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 464–490.
Levin, H. M. (1997). Raising school productivity: An x-efficiency approach. Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 303–311.
Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Masci, C., De Witte, K., & Agasisti, T. (2018). The influence of school size, principal characteristics and school management practices on educational performance: An efficiency analysis of Italian students attending middle schools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 52–69.
Mohapatra, R. (2015). Ranking of efficient states of India on the basis of performances in secondary education: An application of super efficiency models. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(12), 1–15.
Newman, M., Garrett, Z., Elbourne, D., Bradley, S., Noden, P., Taylor, J., & West, A. (2006). Does secondary school size make a difference? A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 1, 41–60.
Purohit, B. C. (2015). Efficiency of education sector: The case of Rajasthan state (India). Madras School of Economics Working paper, 121/2015.
Ray, S. C. (1991). Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of Connecticut data. Management Science, 37(12), 1620–1628.
Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge University Press.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.
Sankar, D. (2007). Education system performance among Indian states: A public expenditure efficiency analysis using Linear Programming Methods. South Asia Human Development Unit (SASHD) of the World Bank.
Singh, N., Pant, M., & Goel, A. (2018). ANN embedded data envelopment analysis approach for measuring the efficiency of state boards in India. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(5), 1092–1106. Springer, The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
Sotiriadis, D., Menexes, G., & Tsamadias, C. (2018). Investigating the efficiency of senior secondary schools: Evidence from schools in the Greek region of Central Macedonia. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), 11(2), 36–43.
Sengupta, A., & Pal, N. P. (2010). Primary education in India: Delivery and outcome—A district level analysis based on DISE data. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 24(1), 5–21.
Sengupta, A., & Pal, N. P. (2012). Assessing the primary schools—A multi-dimensional approach: A school level analysis based on Indian data. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(2), 264–272.
Tyagi, P., Yadav, S. P., & Singh, S. P. (2009). Efficiency analysis of schools using DEA: A case study of Uttar Pradesh state in India. https://www.researchgate.net/.../254871435
Acknowledgements
This chapter is a part of the project funded by Planning and Development Unit (NITI Aayog), Jadavpur University, Kolkata. The fund provided by the Planning and Development Unit is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are extremely grateful to Samagra Shiksha Mission for giving the necessary permission and making arrangements for collecting the data. The authors are indebted to the comments made by Professor Indrani Chakraborty, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, and Professor Achin Chakraborty, The Director, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, for their comments on the earlier draft. The authors sincerely acknowledge the help made by Ms. Sampita Neogi, for collection and compilation of the data. The authors are also grateful to the participants of the online seminar on presentations of ongoing projects of the Planning and Development Unit, Jadavpur University, held on October 2, 2020 for their valuable comments. However, usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ghose, A., Choudhury, S. (2023). Measurement and Determinants of Efficiency of Government and Government-Aided Secondary Schools in Kolkata: An Application of Data Envelopment Approach. In: Raychaudhuri, A., Ghose, A. (eds) Managing Pandemic and Correcting Development Fundamentals. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8680-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8680-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8679-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8680-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)