Skip to main content

A Machine Learning Approach for Honey Adulteration Detection Using Mineral Element Profiles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision and Robotics

Abstract

This research seeks to construct a Machine Learning (ML)-based method for identifying adulterated honey utilizing honey mineral element profiles. The proposed system comprises two phases: preprocessing and classification. The preprocessing phase involves the treatment of missing-value attributes and normalization. In the classification phase, we use three supervised ML models: logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, to discriminate between authentic and adulterated honey. To evaluate the performance of the ML models, we use a public dataset comprising measurements of mineral element content of authentic honey, sugar syrups, and adulterated honey. Experimental findings show that mineral element content in honey provides robust discriminative information for detecting honey adulteration. Results also demonstrate that the random forest-based classifier outperforms other classifiers on this dataset, achieving the highest cross-validation accuracy of 98.37%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Awadhi MA, Deshmukh RR (2021) A review on modern analytical methods for detecting and quantifying adulteration in honey. In: 2021 international conference of modern trends in information and communication technology industry (MTICTI), pp 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/mticti53925.2021.9664767

  2. Tosun M (2013) Detection of adulteration in honey samples added various sugar syrups with 13C/12C isotope ratio analysis method. Food Chem 138:1629–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Islam MK, Sostaric T, Lim LY, Hammer K, Locher C (2020) Sugar profiling of honeys for authentication and detection of adulterants using high-performance thin layer chromatography. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225289

  4. Al-Mahasneh M, Al-U’Datt M, Rababah T, Al-Widyan M, Abu Kaeed A, Al-Mahasneh AJ, Abu-Khalaf N (2021) Classification and prediction of bee honey indirect adulteration using physiochemical properties coupled with k-means clustering and simulated annealing-artificial neural networks (SA-ANNs). J Food Qual. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634598

  5. Song X, She S, Xin M, Chen L, Li Y, Heyden YV, Rogers KM, Chen L (2020) Detection of adulteration in Chinese monofloral honey using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and chemometrics. J Food Compos Anal 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103390

  6. Liu W, Zhang Y, Han D (2016) Feasibility study of determination of high-fructose syrup content of Acacia honey by terahertz technique. Infrared, Millimeter-Wave, Terahertz Technol IV. 10030, 100300J. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2245966

  7. Guelpa A, Marini F, du Plessis A, Slabbert R, Manley M (2017) Verification of authenticity and fraud detection in South African honey using NIR spectroscopy. Food Control 73:1388–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Azmi MFI, Jamaludin D, Abd Aziz S, Yusof YA, Mohd Mustafah A (2021) Adulterated stingless bee honey identification using VIS-NIR spectroscopy technique. Food Res 5:85–93. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(S1).035

  9. Al-Awadhi MA, Deshmukh RR (2022) Honey adulteration detection using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning. In: 2022 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and signal processing (AISP), pp 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AISP53593.2022.9760585

  10. Bodor Z, Kovacs Z, Rashed MS, Kókai Z, Dalmadi I, Benedek C (2020) Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acacia and linden honey adulterated with sugar syrup. Sensors (Switzerland). 20:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Irawati N, Isa NM, Mohamed AF, Rahman HA, Harun SW, Ahmad H (2017) Optical microfiber sensing of adulterated honey. IEEE Sens J 17:5510–5514. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2725910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo L (2020) Data for: discrimination of honey and adulteration by elemental chemometrics profiling. Mendeley Data V1. https://doi.org/10.17632/tt6pp6pbpk.1

  13. Liu T, Ming K, Wang W, Qiao N, Qiu S, Yi S, Huang X, Luo L (2021) Discrimination of honey and syrup-based adulteration by mineral element chemometrics profiling. Food Chem 343:128455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Templ M, Templ B (2021) Statistical analysis of chemical element compositions in food science: problems and possibilities. Molecules 26:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh D, Singh B (2020) Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Appl Soft Comput 97:105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsangaratos P, Ilia I (2016) Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: the influence of models complexity and training dataset size. CATENA 145:164–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Safavian SR, Landgrebe D (1991) A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21:660–674. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.97458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Breiman L (2001) Random forest. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Department of Science and Technology’s Funds for Infrastructure through Science and Technology (DST-FIST) grant SR/FST/ETI-340/2013 to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University in Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the department and university administrators for providing the research facilities and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mokhtar A. Al-Awadhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Al-Awadhi, M.A., Deshmukh, R.R. (2023). A Machine Learning Approach for Honey Adulteration Detection Using Mineral Element Profiles. In: Shukla, P.K., Singh, K.P., Tripathi, A.K., Engelbrecht, A. (eds) Computer Vision and Robotics. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7892-0_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics